-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
Project Meeting 2023.05.23
Michelle Bina edited this page May 29, 2023
·
1 revision
- Admin Items
- Roadmap: Discussion of Management Plan
- Michelle to send out Doodle poll to ask about moving meeting two hours later.
- Michelle to send email blast with two week look ahead for meeting agendas.
- Michelle to investigate and propose approaches for easier searching/archiving for meeting presentation and recordings.
- Revisit scheduling of regular meetings
- Michelle to send out Doodle poll to ask about moving meeting two hours later.
- Group suggested that we email blast the regular meeting attendees with a two-week look ahead for meeting agendas in order for members to better plan their attendance. If we do this and people can feel confident in skipping certain topics/meetings, we need to be diligent about sticking to the planned agendas.
- Archiving of meeting presentations and recordings
- Group requests a more organized way to access presentations and recordings.
- Ideally, the presentations and recordings would be searchable.
- CS to investigate some options and report back to the group.
Presentation: activitysim-roadmap-wip-management-23-may-2023.pptx
- Reviewed and discussed proposed structure
- Proposed structure would allow members to have more focused participation, related to specific staff interests.
- Product Manager would be a heavy lift for a consortium member but would likely be a consultant.
- There was discussion about a potentially reduced member fee if a member provided a lot of their time fulfilling one of these important roles.
- Concern about accountability / chain of command if lead positions are mostly consultants
- Steps to transition to proposed structure
- Step 1: Create Project Management Subcommittee
- Step 2: Identify Community Manager
- Likely a consortium member
- We are currently not doing much of what this person's role would include. Examples of activities would include:
- Post to LinkedIn
- Check in occasionally with members
- Do email blasts to the group
- Propose to add someone around August 2023, try it out, and see how helpful it is to have this position
- Step 3: Decide on Contract Approach for 2024
- Collaborative scoping/budgeting
- Discussion on logistics/roles.
- The Engineering Lead would be responsible for the collaborative scoping/budgeting.
- GitHub issues would be good for identifying needs
- Product manager would put tasks to roadmap
- Once it’s on the roadmap, it needs to make it to engineering team to scope out details
- Engineering lead would put it on spring plan, discuss with engineering team to scope/budget/schedule then bring it to the directors
- Directors would approve
- Pros:
- Having more people scoping tasks out would be a big improvement in developing work plans that are achievable and realistic.
- Cons:
- With all T&M, all risk is put on the consortium.
- This approach requires a lot of trust
- KEY DECISION: All T&M is not an option, but there may be some hybrid approach.
- Discussion on logistics/roles.
- Collaborative scoping/budgeting
- Could the community and product manager be the same – for now maybe? Could be some efficiencies gained?
- Still need to discuss the OKR committee and directors/chairs.
- Need to discuss this topic more, add to TBD agenda.