-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 99
Project Meeting 2021.01.14
Ben Stabler edited this page Jan 18, 2021
·
15 revisions
5b/6a Task 1 Project Management (milestone)
- Contracting
- Bench contract going out next week
- Partner MOA/payment agreement being finalized
- What term should the MOA be? 1 year, 2, year, 3 year?
- Can be different for different agencies
- If signed, commits the agency to paying for that period and gives them a vote in the PMC
- Plan to get contracts signed and executed July 1
- Ohio DOT probably join July 1
- MWCOG probably join July 1 and SERPM maybe next year
- Released code, see releases
- Will create issue for additional ARC submodels that need estimation integration
- It would be good to have scripts to reformat household travel surveys into ActivitySim format for estimation
- We have some for SEMCOG that could be cleaned up and shared
- Would be good to walk through an example, maybe SEMCOG auto ownership, on an upcoming call to help socialize the new functionality
5b Task 2 Strategic Planning (milestone)
- I still need to review V3
6a Task 2 Complete Estimation Mode (milestone)
- Trip mode choice refactored, see estimation
6a Task 3 Telecommute Model in Cooperation with SEMCOG (milestone)
- Telecommute (work_from_home and telecommute_frequency) model programmed, see example
- Using SANDAG model specification and coefficients and faked additional MTC data (person occupancy)
- Would be good to have a real example with MTC data and estimation for distribution
- SFCTA, MTC, and SANDAG all have rMove surveys and maybe they could cooperate to set this up with consultant support
- Survey has telecommute minutes each day (not just T/F for day)
- @Joe to talk with Bay area partners and circle back
- SEMCOG to go ahead with using the new model and then we'll circle back on how to finish the contribution for distribution
6a Task 4 Transit Pass Ownership Model in Cooperation with SEMCOG (milestone)
- Joel working on design to share next week
6a Task 5 Performance Enhancements (milestone)
- Jeff profile the existing examples to identify useful areas for improvement
- @Stefen and @Guy share examples for testing
- Discussed the PSRC two zone system location sampling runtime issues
- Number of zones shouldn't be a limiting factor, i.e. microzones or parcels should work
- Do we want to support parcels? It may have a different design than just microzones
- Can we create a MAZ version of TM2 for testing?
- Let's keep discussing a good solution and Stefan to share more thoughts via email
- I'll talk with Doyle about design / improvements ideas
6a Task 8 Maintenance and Support (milestone)
- Nothing to report