Migrate src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.test.tsx Tests from Jest to Vitest #2636
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve refactoring the unit tests for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Congratulations on making your first PR! 🎊 If you haven't already, check out our Contributing Guidelines and PR Reporting Guidelines to ensure that you are following our guidelines for contributing and creating PR.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx (3)
1-6: Enhance documentation with more specific details.While the documentation comment is a good start, consider enhancing it with:
- Test scenarios covered
- Dependencies and mocks used
- Expected coverage targets
/** * Unit tests for the Donate component. * * This file contains tests for the Donate component to ensure it behaves as expected * under various scenarios. + * + * Test scenarios: + * - Component rendering + * - Currency switching (USD, INR, EUR) + * - Donation functionality + * - Error handling for invalid amounts + * + * Dependencies: + * - Apollo MockedProvider + * - React Testing Library + * - Vitest for mocking + * + * Coverage: Maintains 100% coverage across all scenarios */
156-164: Modernize matchMedia mock implementation.The current implementation includes deprecated methods (
addListener,removeListener). Consider updating to use only modern event handling methods.value: vi.fn().mockImplementation((query) => ({ matches: false, media: query, onchange: null, - addListener: vi.fn(), // Deprecated - removeListener: vi.fn(), // Deprecated addEventListener: vi.fn(), removeEventListener: vi.fn(), dispatchEvent: vi.fn(), })),
Line range hint
189-189: Fix typo in test descriptions.There's a typo in multiple test descriptions: "swtiched" should be "switched".
- test('Currency is swtiched to USD', async () => { + test('Currency is switched to USD', async () => {Also applies to: 208-208, 227-227
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx (4)
11-11: LGTM! Correct migration of mocks to Vitest.
The migration from Jest to Vitest for mocks is implemented correctly:
- Proper import of
vifrom 'vitest' - Correct usage of
vi.mockandvi.importActual - Appropriate implementation of toast mocks
Also applies to: 141-143, 146-150
169-169: LGTM! Correct usage of Vitest's clearAllMocks.
The migration from Jest's clearAllMocks to Vitest's implementation is correct and maintains proper test isolation.
Line range hint 172-351: LGTM! Well-structured and comprehensive test suite.
The test suite:
- Properly covers component rendering
- Includes comprehensive error handling
- Uses consistent async/await patterns
- Maintains good test isolation
Line range hint 1-351: Verify test coverage metrics.
While the test suite appears comprehensive, let's verify the coverage metrics to ensure we meet the 100% coverage requirement.
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different approach to verify the test coverage by analyzing the test file itself.
After analyzing the component implementation and test coverage, I can now provide a final response:
Test coverage appears comprehensive with all key functionality tested.
The test suite covers:
- Basic component rendering and UI elements
- Currency switching functionality (USD, INR, EUR)
- Donation card rendering
- Donation functionality with valid amounts
- Error handling for:
- Below minimum amount
- Above maximum amount
- Empty amount
- Invalid (non-numeric) input
- Integration with GraphQL mutations and queries
- Toast notifications for success/error cases
The only functions marked with istanbul ignore next are the pagination handlers, which are standard React event handlers and don't contain complex logic.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check test coverage for the Donate component
# Note: This assumes the coverage report is generated in the coverage directory
# Run Vitest with coverage
npm run test:vitest -- --coverage src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx
# Display coverage report
cat coverage/coverage-final.json | jq '.["src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.tsx"]'
Length of output: 1118
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's analyze the test file and component file to check coverage
# First, let's see the component implementation
echo "=== Component Implementation ==="
fd Donate.tsx --exec cat {} \;
# Then, let's analyze what's being tested
echo -e "\n=== Test Coverage Analysis ==="
ast-grep --pattern 'test($$$)' src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.spec.tsx
Length of output: 27718
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2636 +/- ##
=====================================================
- Coverage 95.19% 83.81% -11.39%
=====================================================
Files 295 312 +17
Lines 7036 8118 +1082
Branches 1516 1830 +314
=====================================================
+ Hits 6698 6804 +106
- Misses 132 1172 +1040
+ Partials 206 142 -64 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
palisadoes
merged commit 316c3cb
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This PR migrates the test cases in src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.test.tsx from Jest to Vitest, ensuring compatibility with Vitest .
✅ Replace Jest-specific functions and mocks with Vitest equivalents
✅ Ensure all tests in src/screens/UserPortal/Donate/Donate.test.tsx pass after migration using npm run test:vitest
✅ Maintain the test coverage for the file as 100% after migration
✅ Upload a video or photo for this specific file coverage is 100% in the PR description
Issue Number:
Fixes #2573
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Donatecomponent to use thevitestframework.window.matchMediaand error handling assertions.