Refactor : Vitest to EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups Screen #2696
Conversation
WalkthroughThis pull request focuses on refactoring the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Inline review comments failed to post. This is likely due to GitHub's limits when posting large numbers of comments.
🛑 Comments failed to post (37)
.github/workflows/issue.yml (1)
41-48: 💡 Codebase verification
Automatic security label should be removed for dependency issues
After analyzing the recent dependency-related issues, it's clear that these are regular package upgrades without inherent security implications. The issues examined (#2294 for
inquirerand #2072 for@testing-library/user-event) are standard version upgrades primarily focused on new features, bug fixes, and breaking changes, not security vulnerabilities.Automatically adding the "security" label to all dependency issues is misleading and could:
- Create false urgency for regular maintenance tasks
- Make it harder to identify genuine security-related issues
- Lead to confusion in issue prioritization
The code should be modified to remove the automatic "security" label addition, keeping only the "good first issue" label for dependency-related issues.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify the automatic security label addition.
Adding the "security" label automatically to dependency-related issues might need verification, as not all dependency issues are security-related.
Run this script to analyze recent dependency-related issues:
Let me gather more information about the dependency issues to better understand the nature of these security labels.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check recent dependency issues to verify if they were security-related gh issue list \ --label dependencies \ --limit 10 \ --json number,title,labels \ | jq '.[] | {number, title, has_security: (.labels | map(.name) | contains(["security"]))}'Length of output: 398
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the actual content of these dependency-related issues to understand if they're security-related gh issue view 2294 --json body echo "---" gh issue view 2072 --json bodyLength of output: 18108
.github/workflows/compare_translations.py (1)
127-135: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Preserve traceback when re-raising exceptions
To retain the full stack trace, consider re-raising the exception as shown in the diff below.-except json.JSONDecodeError as e: - raise ValueError(f"Error decoding JSON from file {filepath}: {e}") +except json.JSONDecodeError as e: + raise ValueError(f"Error decoding JSON from file {filepath}: {e}") from e📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.with open(filepath, "r", encoding="utf-8") as file: content = file.read() if not content.strip(): raise ValueError(f"File {filepath} is empty.") translation = json.loads(content) flattened_translation = flatten_json(translation) return flattened_translation except json.JSONDecodeError as e: raise ValueError(f"Error decoding JSON from file {filepath}: {e}") from e🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
135-135: Within an
exceptclause, raise exceptions withraise ... from errorraise ... from Noneto distinguish them from errors in exception handling(B904)
schema.graphql (3)
67-71:
⚠️ Potential issueAvoid repeating enums
The enum AdvertisementType appears to be duplicated at lines 67-71 and again at 554-558. Duplicate definitions may cause confusion or schema conflicts.-# One of these enums should be removed or refactored if the underlying concept differs enum AdvertisementType { BANNER MENU POPUP } ... enum AdvertisementType { BANNER MENU POPUP }Also applies to: 554-558
776-781:
⚠️ Potential issueDuplicate type definitions
There appear to be two identical “OrganizationCustomField” types. Consider removing or renaming one of them to avoid schema collisions and maintain clarity.Also applies to: 783-788
1212-1221: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Check for repeated AddressInput definitions
Multiple definitions for AddressInput exist (lines 1212-1221, 43-52). If the intention is only one representation of an address, unify these definitions to prevent potential schema ambiguity.Also applies to: 43-52
.husky/post-merge (1)
1-4: 💡 Codebase verification
Update post-merge hook to include package-lock.json check
The repository uses npm (evidenced by package-lock.json presence) but the current post-merge hook only checks package.json changes. Update the script to:
#!/bin/sh . "$(dirname "$0")/_/husky.sh" git diff HEAD^ HEAD --exit-code -- ./package.json ./package-lock.json || npm installThis ensures dependencies stay synchronized when either package.json or package-lock.json changes during merge operations.
🔗 Analysis chain
Validate the logic after dependency updates
The script runs “npm install” if there are changes in package.json between the previous and current commits. Ensure additional package-lock or yarn.lock checks if the repo uses them. Otherwise, the dependencies might become unsynchronized.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if lock files are present and compare them for changes as well fd --glob "package-lock.json" --exec git diff HEAD^ HEAD --exit-code {} || npm installLength of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # First, let's check if package-lock.json or yarn.lock exists in the repository fd -t f -e json -e lock --max-depth 1 # Then, let's check the package.json to understand the package manager being used cat package.json | jq 'select(.packageManager != null) | .packageManager'Length of output: 171
.husky/pre-commit (1)
10-10: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Reconsider automatic git add
The automatic
git add .might include unintended files modified by the formatting/linting process. Consider being more selective about what gets added.- git add . + git update-index --again📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.git update-index --againDockerfile (2)
1-1: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a more secure base image
The current setup can be improved for security and size optimization.
- FROM node:20.10.0 AS build + FROM node:20.10.0-alpine AS builder📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.FROM node:20.10.0-alpine AS builder
1-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider implementing a multi-stage production build
The current Dockerfile can be optimized for production using a multi-stage build approach.
- FROM node:20.10.0 AS build + FROM node:20.10.0-alpine AS builder WORKDIR /usr/src/app COPY package*.json ./ - RUN npm install + RUN npm ci COPY . . RUN npm run build + FROM node:20.10.0-alpine + WORKDIR /usr/src/app + COPY --from=builder /usr/src/app/dist ./dist + COPY package*.json ./ + RUN npm ci --only=production + USER node EXPOSE 4321 CMD ["npm", "run", "serve"]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.FROM node:20.10.0-alpine AS builder WORKDIR /usr/src/app COPY package*.json ./ RUN npm ci COPY . . RUN npm run build FROM node:20.10.0-alpine WORKDIR /usr/src/app COPY --from=builder /usr/src/app/dist ./dist COPY package*.json ./ RUN npm ci --only=production USER node EXPOSE 4321 CMD ["npm", "run", "serve"].idea/inspectionProfiles/Project_Default.xml (1)
1-6:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove IDE-specific configuration from version control
IDE configuration files should not be committed to version control as they are specific to individual developer environments. Instead:
- Remove the
.ideadirectory- Document ESLint setup instructions in README.md
- The
.ideadirectory is already added to.gitignore, so this file should be removed from git trackingpublic/manifest.json (1)
13-13:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect icon size specification
The icon size
16x16forlogo192.pngappears to be incorrect, as the filename implies it should be192x192. This mismatch could cause display issues.- "sizes": "16x16" + "sizes": "192x192"📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements."sizes": "192x192".gitignore (1)
3-5:
⚠️ Potential issueReconsider excluding lock files
Lock files (
yarn.lock,pnpm-lock.yaml) should typically be committed to ensure reproducible builds across environments. Consider:
- Committing the lock file for your chosen package manager
- Excluding only the lock files from other package managers
public/locales/hi/errors.json (1)
15-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Inconsistent error message between language versions
The error400 message is significantly more detailed in Hindi compared to Chinese:
- Hindi: Detailed message about saving information and suggesting to check entries
- Chinese: Basic message about 400 status code
Consider standardizing the level of detail across language versions:
// In zh/errors.json - "error400": "响应不成功. 从服务器收到状态代码 400" + "error400": "您的信息无法保存。请检查您的输入并重试。"Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
config/vite.config.ts (2)
16-16:
⚠️ Potential issueSecurity: Restrict environment variable exposure
Using
EnvironmentPlugin('all')exposes all environment variables to the client-side bundle, which could potentially leak sensitive information.Consider explicitly listing only the required environment variables:
- EnvironmentPlugin('all'), + EnvironmentPlugin([ + 'NODE_ENV', + 'API_URL', + // Add other required variables + ]),Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
1-31:
⚠️ Potential issueMissing Vitest configuration
The PR objective mentions migrating to Vitest, but the configuration file doesn't include any Vitest-specific setup.
Add Vitest configuration to align with the PR objective. Here's a suggested addition:
import { defineConfig } from 'vite'; import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react'; import viteTsconfigPaths from 'vite-tsconfig-paths'; import svgrPlugin from 'vite-plugin-svgr'; import EnvironmentPlugin from 'vite-plugin-environment'; +import { configDefaults } from 'vitest/config'; export default defineConfig({ // ... existing config ... + test: { + globals: true, + environment: 'jsdom', + setupFiles: './src/setupTests.ts', + coverage: { + reporter: ['text', 'html'], + exclude: [ + ...configDefaults.exclude, + 'src/setupTests.ts', + ], + }, + }, });📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.import { defineConfig } from 'vite'; import react from '@vitejs/plugin-react'; import viteTsconfigPaths from 'vite-tsconfig-paths'; import svgrPlugin from 'vite-plugin-svgr'; import EnvironmentPlugin from 'vite-plugin-environment'; import { configDefaults } from 'vitest/config'; export default defineConfig({ // depending on your application, base can also be "/" build: { outDir: 'build', }, base: '', plugins: [ react(), viteTsconfigPaths(), EnvironmentPlugin('all'), svgrPlugin({ svgrOptions: { icon: true, // ...svgr options (https://react-svgr.com/docs/options/) }, }), ], server: { // this ensures that the browser opens upon server start open: false, host: '0.0.0.0', // this sets a default port to 4321 port: 4321, }, test: { globals: true, environment: 'jsdom', setupFiles: './src/setupTests.ts', coverage: { reporter: ['text', 'html'], exclude: [ ...configDefaults.exclude, 'src/setupTests.ts', ], }, }, });public/locales/en/errors.json (1)
2-2:
⚠️ Potential issueFix grammatical and spelling issues in error messages
Several issues need to be addressed:
- Remove the extra period after exclamation mark in
talawaApiUnavailable- Fix capitalization in
notAuthorisedmessage- Fix spelling of "occurred" in
errorLoadingmessage- "talawaApiUnavailable": "Talawa-API service is unavailable!. Is it running? Check your network connectivity too.", + "talawaApiUnavailable": "Talawa-API service is unavailable! Is it running? Check your network connectivity too.", - "notAuthorised": "Sorry! you are not Authorised!", + "notAuthorised": "Sorry! You are not authorized!", - "errorLoading": "Error occured while loading {{entity}} data", + "errorLoading": "Error occurred while loading {{entity}} data",Also applies to: 5-5, 10-10
public/locales/sp/errors.json (1)
2-8:
⚠️ Potential issueTranslate missing Spanish error messages
The first 8 error messages are still in English and need to be translated to Spanish for consistency:
- talawaApiUnavailable
- notFound
- unknownError
- notAuthorised
- errorSendingMail
- emailNotRegistered
- notFoundMsg
Would you like me to help with the Spanish translations for these messages?
.github/workflows/codeql-codescan.yml (1)
27-29: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the output, I can now generate the final response since we have clear evidence that the project extensively uses TypeScript with numerous
.tsand.tsxfiles throughout the codebase.Add TypeScript to CodeQL analysis for comprehensive coverage
The codebase heavily uses TypeScript with over 300 TypeScript files, including core configuration files, components, utilities, and tests. Adding TypeScript to the CodeQL analysis matrix will ensure proper security scanning of the TypeScript codebase.
matrix: - language: [ 'javascript' ] + language: [ 'javascript', 'typescript' ]🔗 Analysis chain
Verify language configuration for Vitest
Since this PR involves Vitest, which typically uses TypeScript, consider adding TypeScript to the language matrix for comprehensive analysis.
matrix: - language: [ 'javascript' ] + language: [ 'javascript', 'typescript' ]🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if the project uses TypeScript fd -e ts -e tsxLength of output: 26828
.github/workflows/push.yml (1)
29-29:
⚠️ Potential issueConsider using Node.js LTS version
Node.js 22.x is currently not an LTS version and might lead to stability issues. Consider using Node.js 20.x which is the current LTS version.
- node-version: [22.x] + node-version: [20.x]📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.node-version: [20.x]jest.config.js (2)
34-37:
⚠️ Potential issueRemove hard-coded user path
The modulePaths contains a hard-coded user path which could cause issues for other developers.
modulePaths: [ - '/Users/prathamesh/Desktop/Open-Source/palisadoes/talawa-admin/src', '<rootDir>/src', ],📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.modulePaths: [ '<rootDir>/src', ],
74-77:
⚠️ Potential issueIncrease coverage thresholds
The current coverage thresholds (20%) are too low, especially considering:
- The PR template requires 95% coverage
- This PR focuses on improving test coverage
coverageThreshold: { global: { - lines: 20, - statements: 20, + lines: 95, + statements: 95, }, },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.global: { lines: 95, statements: 95, },.github/workflows/talawa_admin_md_mdx_format_adjuster.py (1)
45-64:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for file operations.
The function should handle potential I/O errors gracefully.
Consider this improvement:
def process_file(filepath): """ Process a single Markdown file for MDX compatibility. ... """ + if not os.path.exists(filepath): + print(f"Warning: File {filepath} does not exist") + return + + try: with open(filepath, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as file: content = file.read() # Escape MDX characters new_content = escape_mdx_characters(content) # Write the processed content back to the file only if there is a change if new_content != content: with open(filepath, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as file: file.write(new_content) + except IOError as e: + print(f"Error processing file {filepath}: {str(e)}") + raise📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.def process_file(filepath): """ Process a single Markdown file for MDX compatibility. Args: filepath: The path to the Markdown file to process. Returns: None, writes the processed content back to the file only if there are changes. """ if not os.path.exists(filepath): print(f"Warning: File {filepath} does not exist") return try: with open(filepath, 'r', encoding='utf-8') as file: content = file.read() # Escape MDX characters new_content = escape_mdx_characters(content) # Write the processed content back to the file only if there is a change if new_content != content: with open(filepath, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as file: file.write(new_content) except IOError as e: print(f"Error processing file {filepath}: {str(e)}") raisepublic/locales/sp/common.json (1)
1-98:
⚠️ Potential issueFix inconsistent language usage in Spanish translations.
The file contains a mix of English, Spanish, and French translations, which will confuse Spanish-speaking users.
Here are some examples of inconsistencies:
- French translations:
- "firstName": "First Name", + "firstName": "Nombre", - "lastName": "Last Name", + "lastName": "Apellido"
- English translations that should be Spanish:
- "loading": "Loading...", + "loading": "Cargando...", - "endOfResults": "End of results", + "endOfResults": "Fin de resultados"Would you like me to help provide the correct Spanish translations for all entries?
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
.github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.py (1)
61-61: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Fix unused loop variable
The loop variable
dirsis not used in the loop body.- for root, dirs, files in os.walk(os.path.join(directory, 'src')): + for root, _dirs, files in os.walk(os.path.join(directory, 'src')):📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.for root, _dirs, files in os.walk(os.path.join(directory, 'src')):🧰 Tools
🪛 Ruff (0.8.2)
61-61: Loop control variable
dirsnot used within loop bodyRename unused
dirsto_dirs(B007)
.eslintrc.json (3)
30-37: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update plugins for Vitest
Replace Jest plugin with Vitest plugin in the plugins section.
"plugins": [ "react", "@typescript-eslint", - "jest", "import", "eslint-plugin-tsdoc", + "vitest", "prettier" ],📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements."plugins": [ "react", "@typescript-eslint", "import", "eslint-plugin-tsdoc", "vitest", "prettier" ],
8-15: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add Vitest ESLint configuration
Since we're migrating to Vitest, consider adding the ESLint plugin for Vitest.
"extends": [ "plugin:react/recommended", "eslint:recommended", - "plugin:jest/recommended", "plugin:prettier/recommended", "plugin:@typescript-eslint/recommended", "eslint-config-prettier", + "plugin:vitest/recommended", "prettier" ],📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements."extends": [ "plugin:react/recommended", "eslint:recommended", "plugin:prettier/recommended", "plugin:@typescript-eslint/recommended", "eslint-config-prettier", "plugin:vitest/recommended", "prettier"
131-131: 💡 Codebase verification
Remove Jest ESLint rules and consider adding Vitest ESLint plugin
The codebase is in transition from Jest to Vitest:
- Vitest configuration is properly set up with test patterns, coverage, and environment
- Both Jest and Vitest test scripts exist in package.json
- No Vitest ESLint plugin is installed
Recommendations:
- Remove all Jest-specific ESLint rules since they're not relevant for Vitest tests
- Consider adding
eslint-plugin-vitestfor Vitest-specific linting rules🔗 Analysis chain
Review disabled jest rule in context of Vitest migration
The
jest/expect-expectrule is disabled (set to 0). Since we're migrating to Vitest, consider:
- Removing Jest-specific rules
- Adding Vitest-specific ESLint plugin and rules
Let me gather more information about the test setup and Vitest configuration.
Let me check the Vitest configuration file to see if it's properly set up.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any remaining Jest configurations rg -l "jest" .Length of output: 8524
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check package.json for test-related dependencies and scripts rg "vitest|jest" package.json # Check for Vitest configuration files fd -e config.ts -e config.js vitestLength of output: 704
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check Vitest configuration cat vitest.config.ts # Check if there are any ESLint plugins for Vitest rg "eslint-plugin-vitest" package.json package-lock.jsonLength of output: 1030
package.json (2)
78-80:
⚠️ Potential issueResolve conflicting test scripts
There are two different testing configurations present:
- Vitest-based tests (new)
- Jest-based tests (old)
This could lead to confusion about which testing framework to use.
Consider removing the old Jest configuration since the PR objective is to migrate to Vitest:
"scripts": { "test:vitest": "vitest run", "test:vitest:watch": "vitest", "test:vitest:coverage": "vitest run --coverage", - "test": "cross-env NODE_ENV=test jest --env=./scripts/custom-test-env.js --watchAll --coverage", + "test": "npm run test:vitest"Also applies to: 81-81
163-166:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate resolutions to match dependencies
The resolutions section contains outdated version specifications that don't match the main dependencies.
"resolutions": { - "@apollo/client": "^3.4.0-beta.19", - "@types/react": "17.0.2", - "@types/react-dom": "17.0.2", + "@apollo/client": "^3.11.8", + "@types/react": "^18.3.12", + "@types/react-dom": "^18.3.1", "graphql": "^16.5.0" },📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements."@apollo/client": "^3.11.8", "@types/react": "^18.3.12", "@types/react-dom": "^18.3.1", "graphql": "^16.5.0"CODE_STYLE.md (2)
118-121: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance testing documentation to clarify framework usage.
The testing section should be expanded to provide clear guidance on when to use Jest vs Vitest, including:
- Which framework to use for which types of tests
- How to write and run tests with each framework
- Code coverage requirements and how to check them
Would you like me to help generate the enhanced testing documentation?
38-38:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate testing framework information to include Vitest.
The tech stack section needs to be updated to reflect the current testing setup that includes both Jest and Vitest.
Apply this change:
-Jest & React Testing Library for testing +Jest, Vitest & React Testing Library for testing📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.- Jest, Vitest & React Testing Library for testingCONTRIBUTING.md (1)
102-107:
⚠️ Potential issueUpdate testing instructions to include Vitest commands.
The testing instructions need to be updated to reflect the dual testing framework setup with both Jest and Vitest.
Add Vitest-specific instructions:
1. Test using this set of commands: ``` npm install npm run test --watchAll=false --coverage + npm run test:vitest:coverage ```📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.1. Test using this set of commands:🧰 Tools
🪛 Markdownlint (0.37.0)
104-104: null
Fenced code blocks should have a language specified(MD040, fenced-code-language)
INSTALLATION.md (1)
150-152:
⚠️ Potential issueFix code block formatting
There's an issue with the code block formatting. The closing backticks have an incorrect language specifier:
-````bash +```bash docker build -t talawa-admin . -```bash +```.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug-report.md (1)
31-31:
⚠️ Potential issueFix incorrect context reference
The "Additional details" section mentions "feature request" which is incorrect for a bug report template:
-Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here. +Add any other context or screenshots about the bug report here.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.Add any other context or screenshots about the bug report here.CODE_OF_CONDUCT.md (1)
1-1: 💡 Codebase verification
Based on the gathered information, I can now provide the final response:
Documentation exists but needs Vitest-specific updates
The repository is actively transitioning to Vitest as evidenced by:
- Presence of
vitest.config.ts- New Vitest test scripts in
package.json:test:vitest,test:vitest:watch,test:vitest:coverage- Several
.spec.tsxfiles already using Vitest includingEventVolunteers/VolunteerGroupsHowever, the test documentation in INSTALLATION.md and CONTRIBUTING.md still references Jest and needs to be updated to include:
- New Vitest commands and configuration
- Updated test debugging instructions (jest-preview references should be replaced)
- Migration guide for converting remaining Jest tests
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify test migration documentation
While these documentation changes are valuable, please ensure that the Vitest migration for EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups Screen is properly documented:
- Update test setup instructions
- Document any new test patterns or conventions
- Add migration notes if other developers need to migrate more tests
Let me check the installation and contribution docs for test setup information.
Let me check if there are any recent changes or documentation updates related to Vitest migration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for test documentation in the repository echo "Searching for test documentation..." rg -l "test|vitest" --type mdLength of output: 7679
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check INSTALLATION.md and CONTRIBUTING.md for test setup/migration docs echo "=== INSTALLATION.md test setup ===" rg -A 5 -B 5 "test|vitest" INSTALLATION.md echo -e "\n=== CONTRIBUTING.md test setup ===" rg -A 5 -B 5 "test|vitest" CONTRIBUTING.mdLength of output: 8511
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check recent changes in test configuration and documentation echo "=== Checking for Vitest config ===" fd "vitest.config" echo -e "\n=== Checking for recent test framework changes ===" rg -l "vitest" --type js --type ts --type json echo -e "\n=== Checking package.json for test framework ===" cat package.json | grep -A 5 -B 5 "test"Length of output: 3972
.github/workflows/countline.py (2)
136-140:
⚠️ Potential issueAdd error handling for non-existent directories.
The directory traversal doesn't handle cases where a directory doesn't exist. This could lead to silent failures.
for directory in directories: + if not os.path.exists(directory): + print(f"Warning: Directory '{directory}' does not exist") + continue for root, _, files in os.walk(directory, topdown=False):📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.for directory in directories: if not os.path.exists(directory): print(f"Warning: Directory '{directory}' does not exist") continue for root, _, files in os.walk(directory, topdown=False): for name in files: # Read each file and count the lines found result.append(os.path.join(root, name))
255-264:
⚠️ Potential issueImprove file reading and comment detection.
Several improvements could be made to the file processing:
- The hardcoded latin-1 encoding might not work for all files
- The comment detection is limited and might miss multi-line comments or other comment styles
- with open(filepath, encoding="latin-1") as code: + with open(filepath, encoding="utf-8") as code: line_count = sum( 1 for line in code if line.strip() and not ( line.strip().startswith("#") - or line.strip().startswith("/") + or line.strip().startswith("//") + or line.strip().startswith("/*") + or line.strip().startswith("*") ) )📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.with open(filepath, encoding="utf-8") as code: line_count = sum( 1 for line in code if line.strip() and not ( line.strip().startswith("#") or line.strip().startswith("//") or line.strip().startswith("/*") or line.strip().startswith("*") ) )
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2696 +/- ##
====================================================
+ Coverage 82.81% 86.34% +3.52%
====================================================
Files 295 312 +17
Lines 7274 8134 +860
Branches 1592 1841 +249
====================================================
+ Hits 6024 7023 +999
+ Misses 1012 939 -73
+ Partials 238 172 -66 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@CodeRabbit review.. |
|
@shivasankaran18: I will review the changes. ✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.spec.tsx (2)
65-75: Enhance mock setup documentation and type safetyWhile the mocking implementation is correct, consider these improvements:
- Add more detailed documentation about the mocking strategy
- Add type safety to the mock implementation
-/** Mock useParams to provide consistent test data */ +/** + * Mock useParams to provide consistent test data while preserving other router functionality + * This approach allows us to: + * 1. Control the route parameters in each test + * 2. Maintain the original router behavior for other functions + */ describe('Testing VolunteerGroups Screen', () => { beforeAll(() => { vi.mock('react-router-dom', async () => { const actualDom = await vi.importActual('react-router-dom'); return { ...actualDom, - useParams: vi.fn(), + useParams: vi.fn<[], { orgId?: string; eventId?: string }>(), }; }); });
Line range hint
1-279: Overall: Clean and successful migration to VitestThe migration from Jest to Vitest has been implemented correctly while maintaining all existing test scenarios and coverage. The changes are focused and align well with the PR objectives.
Consider adding these migration patterns to your team's documentation to help with future Jest to Vitest migrations.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.spec.tsx(11 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.spec.tsx (1)
10-10: LGTM: Import changes for Vitest migration
The addition of useParams and vi imports are appropriate for the migration to Vitest.
Also applies to: 17-17
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.spec.tsx
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.spec.tsx (1)
65-75: Enhance the mocking documentationWhile the mocking implementation is correct, the documentation could be more descriptive to explain the purpose and approach.
Consider updating the comment to be more descriptive:
-/** Mock useParams to provide consistent test data */ +/** + * Mock useParams while preserving other react-router-dom functionality + * This allows us to control route parameters in tests while maintaining + * the actual routing behavior from react-router-dom + */
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.spec.tsx(11 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.spec.tsx (5)
10-10: LGTM: Import changes for Vitest migration
The necessary imports for Vitest migration have been correctly added.
Also applies to: 17-17
79-79: LGTM: Cleanup migration to Vitest
The cleanup method has been correctly migrated from Jest to Vitest.
82-84: LGTM: Implemented suggested helper function
The mockRouteParams helper function has been implemented as suggested in previous reviews, reducing code duplication and improving maintainability.
87-88: LGTM: Consistent application of mockRouteParams
The test cases have been consistently updated to use the new helper function while maintaining their original functionality and coverage.
Also applies to: 113-113, 120-120, 150-150, 171-171, 193-193, 203-203, 212-212, 223-223, 234-234, 245-245
Line range hint 1-255: Verify complete migration to Vitest
Let's ensure no Jest-specific code remains in the file.
✅ Verification successful
Migration to Vitest is complete and correct
The verification shows that:
- No Jest-specific APIs (
jest.) are present in the file - All test functions (
describe,it,beforeAll,afterAll,expect) are being used in a Vitest-compatible way - The file correctly imports
vifrom 'vitest' for mocking functionality - Testing utilities are properly imported from '@testing-library/react'
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining Jest references in the test file
# Search for any remaining Jest-specific patterns
echo "Checking for remaining Jest references..."
rg -i 'jest\.' src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.spec.tsx
# Search for common Jest-specific function names
echo "Checking for Jest-specific function names..."
rg -i 'describe|it|beforeAll|afterAll|expect' src/screens/EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups/VolunteerGroups.spec.tsx
# Note: The presence of describe/it/beforeAll/afterAll/expect is okay as they are
# supported by Vitest, but this helps verify they're being used correctly
Length of output: 4503
|
@palisadoes done with the changes |
|
@CodeRabbit review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
|
@palisadoes @dhanagopu I have merged 4 to 5 PRs for covering jest to vitest tests..Can I create a single issue of converting all the screens and components tests to vitest ..I would like to work on it . Could I have your suggestion? |
|
|
@CodeRabbit done with your changes..could you review and approve my PR |
|
@shivasankaran18: Everything looks good from my end. I’m approving the PR now. ✅ Actions performedComments resolved and changes approved. |
|
@palisadoes @dhanagopu done with the changes..I have merged 4 to 5 PRs for covering jest to vitest tests..Can I create a single issue of converting all the screens and components tests to vitest ..I would like to work on it . Could I have your suggestion? |
Thanks, we are dividing the work into multiple issues so that everyone can get a chance. |
palisadoes
merged commit 84c167c
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop-postgres
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Added Vitest to EventVolunteers/VolunteerGroups screen
Issue Number: 2549
Fixes #2549
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Migrated the testing framework to Vitest.
Updated all test files and configurations to be compatible with Vitest's syntax and features.
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
useParamsin theVolunteerGroupscomponent.