Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

refactored: src/screens/Users from Jest to Vitest #2664

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from
Closed

refactored: src/screens/Users from Jest to Vitest #2664

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

antriksh-9
Copy link
Contributor

@antriksh-9 antriksh-9 commented Dec 14, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
It is a refactor of changing the test case migration of jest to vitest.

Issue Number:

Fixes #2585

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes
Snapshots/Videos:

Screenshot 2024-12-15 025050

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not relevant

Summary
This PR migrates the existing tests for Users.tsx from Jest to Vitest

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved handling of asynchronous operations in tests for the Users component.
    • Ensured local storage values are stored as strings for consistency.

  • Tests

    • Updated test cases to standardize naming conventions.
    • Enhanced tests for user roles and search functionality to ensure correct component behavior.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 14, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on refactoring the test suite for the Users component in Users.spec.tsx, migrating from Jest to Vitest. The changes involve updating test syntax, replacing custom wait functions with waitFor, ensuring proper handling of asynchronous operations, and standardizing local storage interactions. The modifications aim to improve test robustness, clarity, and alignment with Vitest's testing approach while maintaining comprehensive test coverage.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/screens/Users/Users.spec.tsx - Replaced custom wait function with waitFor
- Updated test function naming from test to it
- Modified local storage interactions to store values as strings
- Enhanced async test handling with act wrappers
- Updated test cases for user roles and search functionality

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Replace Jest-specific functions with Vitest equivalents [#2585] ✅
Ensure tests pass using npm run test:vitest [#2585] ❓ Requires full test suite verification
Maintain 100% test coverage [#2585] ❓ Requires coverage report confirmation

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

refactor

Suggested reviewers

  • varshith257
  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 In the realm of tests, a rabbit's delight,
Jest to Vitest, code shining bright!
Async ops dance with grace and might,
Local storage strings, now holding tight,
Refactoring magic, pure coding insight! 🧪✨

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. This feature will be included in our Pro Plan when released.

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between f4aafd7 and e39e1b9.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/screens/Users/Users.spec.tsx (24 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
📓 Common learnings 
Learnt from: bitbard3
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2588
File: src/components/ChangeLanguageDropdown/ChangeLanguageDropdown.spec.tsx:145-155
Timestamp: 2024-12-02T04:20:11.745Z
Learning: In PRs focused solely on refactoring test cases from Jest to Vitest, avoid suggesting optimizations or changes outside the migration scope.
🔇 Additional comments (4)
src/screens/Users/Users.spec.tsx (4)

3-9: LGTM! Imports are correctly updated for Vitest

The necessary testing utilities from '@testing-library/react' are properly imported, including waitFor and act for handling asynchronous operations.

293-298: LGTM! Local storage values are properly stringified

The changes correctly handle data types for localStorage:

  • SuperAdmin is stored as a string 'true'
  • AdminFor array is properly JSON stringified

307-307: LGTM! Test cases are properly migrated to Vitest style

All test cases have been correctly converted from Jest to Vitest using 'it' instead of 'test'.

Also applies to: 325-325, 346-346, 365-365, 383-383, 432-432, 464-464, 481-481, 501-501, 522-522, 593-593, 623-623, 645-645, 718-718

320-322: LGTM! Async operations are properly handled

The test cases correctly use:

  • waitFor for async assertions
  • act for state updates
  • Proper async/await syntax

Also applies to: 330-343, 378-380, 396-404, 459-461, 477-477, 495-495, 515-515, 537-537, 607-620, 639-639, 660-660, 674-674, 687-687, 699-699, 712-712, 733-744, 766-774

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

@Cioppolo14
Copy link
Contributor

@antriksh-9 Please fixed the failed tests.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-pr-activity No pull request activity label Dec 25, 2024
@palisadoes
Copy link
Contributor

Closing due to inactivity

@palisadoes palisadoes closed this Dec 25, 2024
@antriksh-9 antriksh-9 deleted the refactor_Users_test branch December 25, 2024 17:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@coderabbitai coderabbitai[bot] coderabbitai[bot] approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
no-pr-activity No pull request activity
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@antriksh-9 @Cioppolo14 @palisadoes