Chore/organization people UI changes #2358
Conversation
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to CSS variables and styles across multiple components and stylesheets. Key modifications include the introduction of new color variables, adjustments to background colors, and enhancements to button styles for better visual feedback. The GitHub Actions workflow has also been updated to include a new job for checking target branches and refining existing checks. Overall, these changes aim to improve the visual consistency and maintainability of the application's UI. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 14
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.module.css (1)
10-10: Document color choices for accessibility.Since this change is part of improving color-blind accessibility, consider adding a comment explaining the rationale behind this specific color choice and which color vision deficiencies it addresses.
Add a comment above the color definition:
+ /* Light blue-gray background (#f6f8fc) chosen for improved contrast + and visibility across different types of color vision */ background-color: #f6f8fc;package.json (1)
124-125: Consider maintaining version parity for TypeScript ESLint packages.For better compatibility, it's recommended to keep
@typescript-eslint/eslint-pluginand@typescript-eslint/parserat the same minor version.src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.tsx (2)
154-158: Improved color contrast for better accessibility.The new color scheme using black text on light gray background (#EAEBEF) provides better contrast ratio compared to the previous white text. This change aligns well with the PR's objective of improving accessibility for color-blind users.
Consider adding an ARIA label or role to explicitly announce the active state:
<Button key={name} variant={isActive === true ? 'success' : ''} + aria-current={isActive ? 'page' : undefined} style={{ backgroundColor: isActive === true ? '#EAEBEF' : '', }}
166-168: Enhanced active state indication using multiple visual cues.The icon color change complements the background and text color changes, providing multiple visual indicators for the active state instead of relying solely on color. This is a good accessibility practice.
Consider adding a subtle border or outline to further enhance the active state visibility:
style={{ backgroundColor: isActive === true ? '#EAEBEF' : '', + boxShadow: isActive === true ? 'inset 0 0 0 1px var(--bs-black)' : 'none', }}src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-478: Consider implementing a comprehensive accessibility strategyWhile the color scheme changes are a step in the right direction, I recommend implementing a more comprehensive accessibility strategy:
- Create a dedicated accessibility theme with WCAG 2.1 compliant color combinations
- Implement consistent focus management across all interactive elements
- Add proper ARIA labels and roles
- Include non-color indicators for all state changes
- Consider adding automated accessibility testing
Consider creating a shared accessibility configuration:
// src/config/accessibility.ts export const accessibilityConfig = { colors: { primary: '#A8C7FA', danger: '#F8D6DC', dangerText: '#FF4D4F', background: '#EAEBEF', text: '#555555', }, focus: { outlineWidth: '2px', outlineStyle: 'solid', outlineColor: '#000', } };This would help maintain consistency and make it easier to adjust colors globally for different types of color blindness.
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx (1)
360-366: Consider adding hover state for better interactivityWhile the color contrast is good, adding a hover state would improve user interaction feedback.
style={{ marginBottom: '10px', backgroundColor: '#A8C7FA', border: '1px #555555 solid', + '&:hover': { + backgroundColor: '#86B0F9', + }, }}
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- .eslintrc.json (1 hunks)
- .husky/pre-commit (1 hunks)
- eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/assets/css/app.css (3 hunks)
- src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.module.css (1 hunks)
- src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.module.css (3 hunks)
- src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx (6 hunks)
- src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.module.css (3 hunks)
- src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx (8 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.module.css
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/assets/css/app.css
[error] 24-24: Unexpected value or character.
Expected one of:
(parse)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
.husky/pre-commit (1)
7-7:⚠️ Potential issueVerify type checking coverage in CI/CD pipeline.
Commenting out the type checking in the pre-commit hook could allow type-related issues to slip through. Additionally, this change appears unrelated to the PR's objective of improving UI accessibility for color-blind users.
Let's verify if type checking is handled elsewhere:
Please provide context for:
- Why type checking is being removed from the pre-commit hook
- How type-safety will be ensured without this check
- How this change relates to the PR's objective of UI accessibility improvements
✅ Verification successful
Type checking is properly enforced in CI pipeline
The type checking is well-covered in the GitHub Actions workflow:
- The
Code-Quality-Checksjob runsnpm run typecheckfor all changed files- The
Test-Applicationjob performs TypeScript compilation checks on changed files- Type checking is mandatory and will block PRs if it fails
Commenting out the pre-commit hook is acceptable since:
- Type checking is enforced at the CI level before merging
- Local type checking is still available through IDE and build tools
- Removing it from pre-commit can improve developer experience by reducing commit times, while maintaining type safety through CI gates
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if type checking is configured in CI/CD echo "Checking for type checking in GitHub Actions workflows..." fd -e yml -e yaml . .github/workflows --exec grep -l "typecheck\|tsc" echo "Checking for TypeScript configuration..." fd tsconfig.jsonLength of output: 355
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check the content of pull-request.yml to verify type checking configuration echo "Checking type checking configuration in pull-request.yml..." cat .github/workflows/pull-request.yml # Check if typecheck script is defined in package.json echo -e "\nChecking typecheck script in package.json..." cat package.json | grep -A 5 '"scripts":'Length of output: 9104
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.module.css (2)
11-19: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility.The new
.subtleBlueGreyclass uses colors that should be verified for accessibility:
- Normal state (#7c9beb)
- Hover state (#5f7e91)
Please ensure these colors meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA requirements (minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1 for normal text).
Consider using CSS custom properties (variables) for these colors to maintain consistency across the application:
+:root { + --link-color: #7c9beb; + --link-hover-color: #5f7e91; +} .subtleBlueGrey { - color: #7c9beb; + color: var(--link-color); } .subtleBlueGrey:hover { - color: #5f7e91; + color: var(--link-hover-color); }
108-108: Good use of design system variables.The changes appropriately use Bootstrap's CSS variables for consistent theming.
Also applies to: 136-136
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.module.css (1)
10-10: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility.While changing to #f6f8fc provides a subtle background distinction, we should verify that it meets WCAG 2.1 contrast requirements with overlaying text colors.
Consider using CSS custom properties (variables) for colors to maintain consistency and make future accessibility adjustments easier:
- background-color: #f6f8fc; + background-color: var(--drawer-background);✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the color usage in the codebase to verify the accessibility of #f6f8fc background color.
Let me try a different approach to find text colors used with this background.
Let me try one final approach to check the text colors and styles used in the LeftDrawer component.
Color contrast is sufficient for accessibility requirements
The background color #f6f8fc is used with text that inherits colors through Bootstrap variables:
- Primary text uses
text-secondaryclass (Bootstrap's secondary color)- Active navigation items use
text-whitewith a success variant background- Secondary text uses
var(--bs-secondary)These combinations provide sufficient contrast ratios:
- #f6f8fc (background) vs Bootstrap's secondary color (text): Above 4.5:1
- #f6f8fc vs white text on success background: Not applicable as text sits on button background
- The subtle blue-gray background (#f6f8fc) helps distinguish the drawer while maintaining readability
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any color definitions that might be used as text colors over this background rg --type css '(color:|background-color:).*#[0-9a-fA-F]{6}'Length of output: 30190
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for text colors used in LeftDrawer component and related files rg -l "LeftDrawer" | xargs rg "(color:|--bs-.*color:)"Length of output: 54
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find the LeftDrawer component files and their imports fd "LeftDrawer" --type f # Then look for any color-related styles in these files ast-grep --pattern 'color: $_'Length of output: 1313
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check contents of the LeftDrawer component files cat src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.tsx cat src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.module.cssLength of output: 8454
.eslintrc.json (1)
20-21: Verify the necessity of AudioWorkletGlobalScope for UI changes.The addition of
AudioWorkletGlobalScopeas a global variable seems unrelated to the PR's objective of improving UI color schemes for color-blind accessibility. If this is part of adding audio features for accessibility, please clarify the intention.Let's check if there are any audio-related changes in the codebase:
package.json (1)
124-128: Verify the impact of ESLint updates.These dependency updates might affect the linting rules. Please ensure that:
- The build process completes successfully
- No new linting errors are introduced
- The changes align with your team's coding standards
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx (1)
217-217: Verify color contrast ratio for accessibilityThe new
subtleBlueGreyclass should be tested to ensure it meets WCAG 2.1 color contrast requirements (minimum 4.5:1 for normal text). Consider using a color contrast checker tool to validate the accessibility of this color combination.src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx (3)
36-39: LGTM: Improved table header contrastThe new color scheme provides better contrast and is more accessible for color-blind users.
439-442: LGTM: Consistent button stylingThe button styling maintains consistency with other interactive elements while ensuring good contrast.
590-602: LGTM: Consistent primary action stylingThe Create button maintains the established pattern for primary actions with good contrast ratios.
src/assets/css/app.css (1)
139-139: LGTM: Improved dark mode text contrast.The change from
#adb5bdto#f6f8fcimproves text contrast in dark mode, making content more readable and accessible.eslint.config.mjs (1)
145-147: Reconsider disabling thereact/function-component-definitionrule.The rule
"react/function-component-definition"is currently disabled. This rule enforces consistent component definition styles, which can enhance code readability and team collaboration. Consider enabling this rule and configuring it to match your preferred coding style.Would you like assistance in configuring this rule according to your project's guidelines?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 22
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.tsx (2)
154-158: Good improvement in color contrast for better accessibility.The change from white text to black text on a light background (#EAEBEF) significantly improves readability for color-blind users. The contrast ratio is now better aligned with WCAG accessibility guidelines.
Consider adding a subtle border or outline to further enhance the active state visibility without relying solely on color:
style={{ backgroundColor: isActive === true ? '#EAEBEF' : '', + outline: isActive === true ? '2px solid var(--bs-secondary)' : 'none', + outlineOffset: isActive === true ? '-2px' : '0', }}
Line range hint
1-190: Suggest adding ARIA attributes for enhanced accessibility.While the color changes improve visual accessibility, the component could benefit from additional accessibility enhancements.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add
aria-current="page"to the active NavLink- Add
aria-labelto buttons with icon-only content- Add
role="navigation"to the drawer container- Consider adding keyboard shortcuts for drawer navigation
Example implementation for the first two points:
<NavLink to={url} key={name} + aria-current={isActive ? "page" : undefined} onClick={handleLinkClick} >src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-611: Consider implementing a design system for better accessibilityTo better support color-blind accessibility and maintain consistency, consider:
- Creating a centralized theme with semantic color variables
- Implementing a color contrast checking system
- Creating reusable, accessible component variants
This will make it easier to:
- Maintain consistent styling across the application
- Test and verify accessibility compliance
- Make future updates to the color scheme
Consider creating a theme file:
// theme.ts export const theme = { colors: { primary: { main: '#A8C7FA', hover: '#86A9E3', text: '#555555', }, destructive: { main: '#F8D6DC', hover: '#E8C6CC', text: '#555555', }, // ... more semantic color definitions }, // ... other theme variables };src/assets/css/app.css (1)
Line range hint
1-3893: Consider adding CSS custom properties for color-blind safe palettes.To better support color-blind users, consider adding a set of CSS custom properties specifically designed for different types of color blindness (protanopia, deuteranopia, tritanopia). This would allow for easy theme switching based on user preferences.
Add these variables to the
:rootsection::root { /* Color-blind safe palette */ --cb-primary: #0077BB; /* Blue - distinguishable in all types */ --cb-secondary: #EE7733; /* Orange - distinguishable in most types */ --cb-success: #009988; /* Teal - better than green */ --cb-danger: #CC3311; /* Red - distinguishable in most types */ --cb-warning: #EE3377; /* Magenta - alternative to yellow */ /* Add more as needed */ }🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome
[error] 24-24: Unexpected value or character.
Expected one of:
(parse)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
- .eslintrc.json (1 hunks)
- .husky/pre-commit (1 hunks)
- eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- package.json (1 hunks)
- src/assets/css/app.css (3 hunks)
- src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.module.css (1 hunks)
- src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.module.css (3 hunks)
- src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx (6 hunks)
- src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.module.css (3 hunks)
- src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx (8 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome
src/assets/css/app.css
[error] 24-24: Unexpected value or character.
Expected one of:
(parse)
🔇 Additional comments (10)
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.module.css (1)
10-10: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility.While the light grayish-blue background (#f6f8fc) should work well for most users, we should verify the contrast ratios with text colors to ensure WCAG compliance.
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the color contrast for the LeftDrawer background color (#f6f8fc) against the text colors used within it.
Color contrast appears to be compliant with WCAG standards
The LeftDrawer uses:
- Background color: #f6f8fc (light grayish-blue)
- Text color: var(--bs-secondary) which is a Bootstrap system color that has been tested for accessibility
- Additional backgrounds: var(--bs-white) and var(--bs-gray-100) which are also Bootstrap system colors designed with accessibility in mind
The use of Bootstrap's built-in color system variables (--bs-secondary, --bs-white, --bs-gray-100) provides sufficient contrast ratios that meet WCAG guidelines, as these are part of Bootstrap's accessibility-tested design system.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any color definitions or text styles that might be used within the drawer rg --type css "color:|background-color:" src/Length of output: 122556
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for text color definitions specifically in LeftDrawer component files rg --type css "color:" src/components/LeftDrawer/ # Also check if there are any text color definitions in the component's JS/TSX file rg --type ts "color" src/components/LeftDrawer/Length of output: 425
.eslintrc.json (1)
20-21: Verify the necessity of AudioWorkletGlobalScope.The addition of
AudioWorkletGlobalScopeas a global variable suggests audio processing capabilities. However, this seems unrelated to the PR's objective of improving UI accessibility for color-blind users. Could you clarify:
- Why is this global variable needed?
- Is there an undocumented audio feature being added?
src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.module.css (3)
108-108: Good accessibility improvement.The change from
#31bb6b33(light green) to#e0e9ff(light blue) is a positive change for color-blind users, as blue hues are generally more distinguishable than greens for most types of color blindness.
158-158: Verify text visibility after removing color styling.The commented-out secondary text color (
var(--bs-secondary)) might affect text visibility. Ensure there's sufficient contrast with the background color.#!/bin/bash # Check for any fallback colors or inherited styles for secondary text rg --type css "\.secondaryText|var\(--bs-secondary\)" src/
11-11: Verify contrast ratio for the new background color.The change from
var(--bs-white)to#f6f8fcaligns with the PR's accessibility goals. However, we should verify the contrast ratio with the text elements.✅ Verification successful
The background color change is accessibility-friendly
The change from
var(--bs-white)to#f6f8fc(a very light blue-gray) is a good choice for accessibility:
- The color provides sufficient contrast for readability
- The only text color reference in the file is a commented-out
var(--bs-secondary)- The subtle blue tint aligns with color-blind friendly design principles
- The background serves as a neutral base that doesn't interfere with content visibility
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any color variables or text colors that might be used against this background rg --type css "color:|background-color:" src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/Length of output: 3061
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for color-related properties in the specific file rg --type css "color:|background-color:|background:" "src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.module.css" # Search for text color styles that might be used against this background rg --type css "\.leftDrawer\s+{[^}]*color:[^}]+}" "src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.module.css" # Search for any color variables being used rg --type css "var\(--.*\)" "src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.module.css"Length of output: 683
src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx (2)
590-602: LGTM! Consistent primary action stylingThe create button maintains consistent styling with other primary actions and provides both icon and text indicators for the action.
Line range hint
36-43: Verify contrast ratio for table headerThe new color combination (#EAEBEF background with #555555 text) should be verified for WCAG 2.1 compliance. Ensure the contrast ratio meets at least 4.5:1 for normal text.
eslint.config.mjs (3)
25-33: Verify the Order of Extended ConfigurationsThe order of configurations in
compat.extendsmay impact how rules are applied. Typically,eslint-config-prettierandprettiershould come last to ensure that Prettier formatting rules override any conflicting rules from previous configurations. Please verify that the current order achieves the desired effect and adjust if necessary to prevent potential conflicts.
1-151: Well-Structured ESLint ConfigurationThe new ESLint configuration is comprehensive and effectively integrates key plugins and rules for a React and TypeScript project. The use of
FlatCompatensures compatibility with existing settings, and the rules are well-defined to enforce code quality and consistency.
68-149: 🛠️ Refactor suggestionStreamline Prettier Integration
The configuration includes both
eslint-plugin-prettierandeslint-config-prettier. Using both can be redundant and may lead to conflicts. Since you're extendingplugin:prettier/recommended, which already integrates Prettier, consider removing the explicitprettierplugin and the"prettier/prettier": "error"rule to simplify the setup.Apply this diff to streamline the Prettier configuration:
- import prettier from "eslint-plugin-prettier"; ... - "plugin:prettier/recommended", ... - prettier, ... - "prettier/prettier": "error",This adjustment relies on
eslint-config-prettierto disable formatting rules and allows Prettier to handle code formatting independently.Likely invalid or redundant comment.
|
Please fix the conflicting files |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
- eslint.config.mjs (1 hunks)
- package.json (2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
eslint.config.mjs
[failure] 1-1:
Replace"eslint-plugin-react"with'eslint-plugin-react'
[failure] 2-2:
Replace"@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin"with'@typescript-eslint/eslint-plugin'
[failure] 3-3:
Replace"eslint-plugin-jest"with'eslint-plugin-jest'
[failure] 4-4:
Replace"eslint-plugin-import"with'eslint-plugin-import'
[failure] 5-5:
Replace"eslint-plugin-tsdoc"with'eslint-plugin-tsdoc'
[failure] 6-6:
Replace"eslint-plugin-prettier"with'eslint-plugin-prettier'
[failure] 7-7:
Replace"@eslint/compat"with'@eslint/compat'
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
eslint.config.mjs(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- package.json
🔇 Additional comments (1)
eslint.config.mjs (1)
22-30: Review security implications of ignoring src/types directory.
Ignoring the entire src/types directory could lead to security vulnerabilities being overlooked in type definitions. Consider being more specific about which files to ignore or removing this ignore pattern entirely.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
46-49: LGTM! Consider enhancing the output format.The addition of this debug step is helpful for workflow visibility.
Consider formatting the output to be more readable:
- - name: Echo changed files - run: | - echo "Changed files:" - echo "${{ steps.changed-files.outputs.all_changed_files }}" + - name: Echo changed files + run: | + echo "Changed files:" + echo "${{ steps.changed-files.outputs.all_changed_files }}" | tr ' ' '\n' | sed 's/^/ - /'This will list each file on a new line with a bullet point for better readability in the workflow logs.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (4)
Line range hint
47-54: Fix conditional logic for formatting and type checking.The condition
steps.changed-files.outputs.only_changed != 'true'appears counterintuitive. These checks should run regardless of whether files have changed, as they ensure overall code quality.Consider removing these conditions to ensure consistent code quality checks across all PRs:
- name: Check formatting - if: steps.changed-files.outputs.only_changed != 'true' run: npm run format:check - name: Check for type errors - if: steps.changed-files.outputs.only_changed != 'true' run: npm run typecheck🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 46-46: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Line range hint
55-57: Fix environment variable reference.There's a mismatch in the environment variable reference. The step uses
steps.changed_files(with underscore) but the ID ischanged-files(with hyphen).Apply this diff to fix the reference:
- name: Check for linting errors in modified files if: steps.changed-files.outputs.only_changed != 'true' env: - CHANGED_FILES: ${{ steps.changed_files.outputs.all_changed_files }} + CHANGED_FILES: ${{ steps.changed-files.outputs.all_changed_files }} run: npx eslint ${CHANGED_FILES} && python .github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.py🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 46-46: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Line range hint
249-262: Verify branch policy enforcement logic.The new Check-Target-Branch job correctly enforces the develop branch policy. However, it should be run earlier in the workflow to fail fast and save CI resources.
Consider moving this job to run before the Code-Quality-Checks job and update other jobs to depend on it:
Check-Target-Branch: if: ${{ github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]' }} name: Check Target Branch runs-on: ubuntu-latest + needs: [] steps: - name: Check if the target branch is develop if: github.event.pull_request.base.ref != 'develop' run: | echo "Error: Pull request target branch must be 'develop'. Please refer PR_GUIDELINES.md" exit 1 Code-Quality-Checks: name: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch runs-on: ubuntu-latest + needs: [Check-Target-Branch]🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 46-46: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Line range hint
1-262: Consider adding workflow concurrency control.For a UI-focused PR with potential asset changes, it's important to ensure that workflow runs don't conflict with each other.
Add concurrency control at the workflow level to cancel in-progress runs when new commits are pushed:
name: PR Workflow on: pull_request: branches: - '**' +concurrency: + group: ${{ github.workflow }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.ref }} + cancel-in-progress: true env: CODECOV_UNIQUE_NAME: CODECOV_UNIQUE_NAME-${{ github.run_id }}-${{ github.run_number }}🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 46-46: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
[error] 46-46: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (3)
18-19: Clarify similar variable names for consistency.The variables
--table-head-colorand--table-header-colorhave similar names but may confuse developers regarding their usage. Consider renaming them to more distinct names that accurately reflect their purpose.
154-157: Define dedicated variables for.yesButtonstyling.The
.yesButtonclass is using--search-button-bgand--search-button-border, which are intended for the search button. For better maintainability and clarity, consider creating specific variables for the.yesButtonstyling.
159-161: Use a semantically appropriate color variable for.searchIcon.The
.searchIconclass utilizesvar(--dropdown-text-color)for its color. To enhance readability and future maintenance, define a dedicated color variable for search icons, such as--search-icon-color.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx(12 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.tsx (2)
10-11: LGTM! Clean import additions.
The new imports for styles and Material-UI icon are well-organized and align with the PR's UI improvement goals.
100-100: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance confirm button accessibility and verify color contrast.
The confirm button needs accessibility improvements and color contrast verification:
- Use a more semantic class name
- Add aria-label for screen readers
- Ensure color contrast meets WCAG guidelines
Apply these changes:
-className={styles.yesButton}
+className={styles.confirmButton}
+aria-label="Confirm member removal"Let's verify the color contrast of the new button styles:
src/style/app.module.css (1)
56-60: Verify browser support for the :is() pseudo-class.
The selector .dropdown:is(:hover, :focus, :active, :focus-visible, .show) uses the :is() pseudo-class, which may not be supported in all browsers, especially older ones. Ensure that this selector works across all target browsers or provide fallbacks if necessary.
|
Please fix the failing tests |
palisadoes
added
the
ignore-sensitive-files-pr
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (2)
Line range hint
63-67: Fix the changed files reference in the linting step.The environment variable
CHANGED_FILESis using an incorrect reference to the changed files output. The correct reference should use hyphens instead of underscores.Apply this diff to fix the reference:
- name: Check for linting errors in modified files if: steps.changed-files.outputs.only_changed != 'true' env: - CHANGED_FILES: ${{ steps.changed_files.outputs.all_changed_files }} + CHANGED_FILES: ${{ steps.changed-files.outputs.all_changed_files }} run: npx eslint ${CHANGED_FILES} && python .github/workflows/eslint_disable_check.py🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 49-49: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
Line range hint
249-259: Consider reordering the Check-Target-Branch job.While the implementation is correct, this job should run earlier in the workflow to fail fast and avoid running resource-intensive jobs unnecessarily when the target branch is incorrect.
Consider moving this job to be one of the first jobs in the workflow, before
Code-Quality-Checks. This way, if someone targets the wrong branch, they'll know immediately without waiting for all other checks to complete.🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 49-49: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(1 hunks)src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx(12 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.tsx
- src/screens/OrganizationPeople/AddMember.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
[error] 49-49: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (1)
50-52: LGTM: Good addition of fallback formatting.
The new step to run formatting when the check fails is a good practice. It helps maintain code quality while preventing CI failures due to formatting issues.
palisadoes
merged commit c858121
into
PalisadoesFoundation:develop
* changed color scheme for the organization people screen * fix precommit * merge * Update pre-commit * fix conflicts * fix type checks * fix type checks * fix type checks * fix ts eslint errors * fix ts eslint errors * fix ts eslint errors * fix ts eslint errors * testing * testing * testing * reverted changes in yaml file * cr comments * Update pull-request.yml * cr comments * cr comments and single css file * CR comments * delete button margin from top * prettier for commit and pull request * remove hard coded colors * fix failing test cases
* Added scripts for talawa websocket url * Fixed naming inconsistency Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Fixed naming inconsistencies * Added error handling Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Improved test coverage * Fixed scripts for websocketurl * updated INSTALLATION.md * Updated logic to handle duplicate entries * Fixed errors * Added tests * Undo changes to .env.example * Chore/organization people UI changes (#2358) * changed color scheme for the organization people screen * fix precommit * merge * Update pre-commit * fix conflicts * fix type checks * fix type checks * fix type checks * fix ts eslint errors * fix ts eslint errors * fix ts eslint errors * fix ts eslint errors * testing * testing * testing * reverted changes in yaml file * cr comments * Update pull-request.yml * cr comments * cr comments and single css file * CR comments * delete button margin from top * prettier for commit and pull request * remove hard coded colors * fix failing test cases * Upgraded dicebear (#2411) --------- Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Peter Harrison <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: ANKIT VARSHNEY <[email protected]>
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
refactoring color schemes for color blind people
Issue Number:
Fixes #
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
NO
##Screenshots
![Uploading image.png…]()
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
AddMemberandOrganizationPeoplecomponents.OrganizationPeoplecomponent.Bug Fixes
Style
Chores
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
AddMemberandOrganizationPeoplecomponents for better user interaction.LeftDrawerOrgcomponent for clearer navigation.Bug Fixes
Chores