fixes #2094 : mobile screen responsive, fixed overflow

[anuragnegi000]

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

It was a simple issue: the group of dropdowns was overflowing because the overflow property was not set.

Issue Number:

#2094

Fixes #

Did you add tests for your changes?

Not required it was a basic tailwind css issue

Snapshots/Videos:

Before :-
Screencast from 2024-11-11 13-28-18.webm

After:-
Screencast from 2024-11-11 13-27-31.webm

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Not required

Summary

Responsiveness should be the top priority for the website, so I decided to focus on that first.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?
No

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Enhanced responsiveness of the search and filter controls in the Organization Action Items component.

• Bug Fixes

  • Improved layout for better alignment and spacing of buttons and dropdowns.

• Style

  • Updated styles for overflow handling on medium-sized screens.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on the OrganizationActionItems component, specifically enhancing its layout and responsiveness. Modifications include updates to class names for better overflow handling on medium screens and adjustments to the structure of dropdown menus and buttons for improved alignment. While the core functionality remains unchanged, these layout and styling updates aim to create a more flexible and user-friendly interface.

Changes

File	Change Summary
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx	Adjusted layout of search and filter controls for responsiveness; updated class names for overflow handling; modified container structure for dropdowns and buttons for better alignment.

Possibly related PRs

• [organization] updated organization screen #2085: This PR modifies the OrganizationActionItems.tsx file to filter action items, which is closely related to the layout and structure changes made in the main PR for the same component.
• Chore/organization people UI changes #2358: This PR includes UI changes that affect the OrganizationPeople component, which may share styling and layout considerations with the OrganizationActionItems component, particularly in terms of overall UI consistency and responsiveness.

Suggested labels

no-pr-activity

Suggested reviewers

• palisadoes

Poem

In a world of screens so wide,
The action items now take pride.
With buttons aligned and filters neat,
A layout that's truly a treat!
So hop along, let's cheer and play,
For a responsive, bright new day! 🐇✨

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[github-actions]

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

1. comments in this PR or
2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.26%. Comparing base (626fe45) to head (a13091d).
Report is 1 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2426   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    98.26%   98.26%           
========================================
  Files          297      297           
  Lines         8639     8639           
  Branches      2514     2514           
========================================
  Hits          8489     8489           
  Misses         139      139           
  Partials        11       11           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c923cff and df508dd.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (1 hunks)

Not meaningful