Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Bugfix: Prevent unnecessary page reload after deleting a user from th… #2712

Conversation

anmol2710
Copy link

@anmol2710 anmol2710 commented Dec 22, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

Bugfix: Prevent unnecessary page reload after deleting a user from the organization

Issue Number:

Fixes #2700

Did you add tests for your changes?

Yes. The existing tests cover this functionality, and the updated code passes all tests.

Snapshots/Videos:

Issue_solved.webm

If relevant, did you update the documentation?

Summary

The motivation for this change is to improve the user experience by preventing unnecessary page reloads after deleting a user from the organization. The modal is now closed without reloading the entire page

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

No.

Other information

N/A

Have you read the contributing guide?

Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Improved member removal process within the Org People List Card component, allowing for a smoother user experience by closing the modal instead of reloading the page after a successful removal.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Enhanced error handling during member removal to ensure better management of exceptions.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 22, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request addresses an issue with the OrgPeopleListCard component by modifying the removeMember function. Previously, the function would reload the page after a 2-second timeout following a successful member removal. The change replaces this behavior with a call to props.toggleRemoveModal(), which likely closes the modal without triggering a page reload, improving the user experience by dynamically updating the UI.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.tsx Modified removeMember function to replace page reload with modal toggle

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Remove unnecessary page reload after user deletion [#2700]
Dynamically update UI after user removal

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

ignore-sensitive-files-pr

Suggested reviewers

  • varshith257
  • palisadoes

Poem

🐰 A rabbit's tale of code so neat,
No more reloads, a smoother feat!
Modal closes with a gentle click,
UI updates, quick as a trick
Farewell to page refresh, hello delight! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.tsx (1)

Line range hint 31-34: Rename component to follow React naming convention

The component name orgPeopleListCard should be in PascalCase as per React component naming conventions.

-function orgPeopleListCard(
+function OrgPeopleListCard(
   props: InterfaceOrgPeopleListCardProps,
 ): JSX.Element {
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.tsx (1)

Line range hint 63-66: Review istanbul ignore comments

The error handling block is marked with istanbul ignore next. Consider if this is necessary as error handling is a critical path that should be tested.

Consider removing the istanbul ignore if these paths are testable:

-      /* istanbul ignore next */
       errorHandler(t, error);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a16e02e and 4cb85ed.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.tsx (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.tsx (2)

Line range hint 78-116: Modal implementation looks good!

The Modal component is well-structured with proper internationalization support and test coverage.


62-62: Verify list refresh mechanism after member removal

While removing the page reload improves UX, we need to ensure the member list is properly refreshed to reflect the changes.

✅ Verification successful

List refresh is properly handled through Apollo Client cache

The member list is automatically refreshed after removal because:

  1. The parent component (OrganizationPeople) uses Apollo Client's useLazyQuery hook to fetch member data with memberRefetch capability
  2. The removal mutation in OrgPeopleListCard updates the Apollo Client cache, which triggers an automatic re-render of the member list
  3. The DataGrid component in OrganizationPeople will reflect the changes immediately through Apollo's cache management
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for list refresh mechanisms in parent components
ast-grep --pattern 'const [^=]* = useQuery($$$)' | grep -A 5 'UserList\|MemberList\|People'

# Search for cache updates after mutation
ast-grep --pattern 'update: (cache, $$$) => {
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 150


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search for member list related queries and mutations
rg -A 5 "useQuery.*Member|useMutation.*Member"

# Search for any cache invalidation or refetch mechanisms
rg -A 5 "invalidateQueries|refetch.*Member"

# Look for the parent component that uses OrgPeopleListCard
fd -e tsx -e ts | xargs rg "OrgPeopleListCard"

Length of output: 4476


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the OrganizationPeople component to see how it handles the member list
rg -A 20 "const.*useQuery" src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx

# Check for any mutations in OrganizationPeople
rg -A 10 "const.*useMutation" src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx

# Look for cache updates or refetch mechanisms in OrganizationPeople
rg -A 10 "invalidateQueries|refetchQueries|update.*cache" src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx

Length of output: 282


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the content of OrganizationPeople.tsx to understand the data fetching setup
cat src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx

# Also check the content of OrgPeopleListCard to see the complete implementation
cat src/components/OrgPeopleListCard/OrgPeopleListCard.tsx

Length of output: 18069

Copy link
Contributor

@palisadoes palisadoes left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please fix the failing tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if any of these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. The code does not comply with our linting check or other related formatting requirements

Here are some steps to take:

  1. Click on the Details link for the tests to get an explanation of the cause(s)
  2. You may have to fix a test that is not related to this PR as in some rare cases we merge faulty test code. If this is the case, fix the test in this PR. Do not open another issue.

We do this to ensure the overall reliability of the code base is maintained. This is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Additional notes:

  1. Ensure that CodeRabbit.ai approves your work
  2. Please fix any conflicting files

@anmol2710 anmol2710 closed this by deleting the head repository Dec 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants