Fix User Role in People Section #2459
Conversation
WalkthroughThe Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx (2)
55-55: LGTM: State management for user roles
The addition of updatedMembers state is appropriate for tracking and maintaining the user role information.
Line range hint 245-267: Verify role display in PeopleCard component
The role display implementation looks correct, but let's verify the PeopleCard component properly renders the role.
✅ Verification successful
Role display implementation is correctly integrated
The verification confirms that:
- The
roleprop is properly defined inInterfaceOrganizationCardPropsinterface in both components - PeopleCard component renders the role value within a styled span element using the
greenTextCSS class - The role value from
member.userTypeis correctly passed to the PeopleCard component
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if PeopleCard component correctly handles the role prop
ast-grep --pattern 'interface InterfaceOrganizationCardProps {
$$$
role: string;
$$$
}'
# Verify role rendering in PeopleCard
ast-grep --pattern 'function PeopleCard($props) {
$$$
role $$$
}'
Length of output: 1237
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check how PeopleCard component renders the role
rg -A 10 "const PeopleCard" src/components/UserPortal/PeopleCard/PeopleCard.tsx
# Also check if there's any role-specific rendering logic
rg "role" src/components/UserPortal/PeopleCard/PeopleCard.tsx
Length of output: 351
| if (data && data2) { | ||
| const adminIds = data2.organizations[0].admins.map((admin: any) => admin._id); | ||
|
|
||
| const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map((member: InterfaceMember) => { | ||
| const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id); | ||
| return { | ||
| ...member, | ||
| userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User', | ||
| }; | ||
| }); | ||
| setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers); | ||
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | ||
| } | ||
| }, [data]); | ||
| }, [data, data2]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add type safety and error handling to the data processing logic
The current implementation has several potential issues:
- The admin mapping uses
anytype - No null checks for
organizations[0] - Potential race condition in data processing
Consider applying these improvements:
useEffect(() => {
if (data && data2) {
+ // Ensure organization exists
+ const organization = data2.organizations?.[0];
+ if (!organization) {
+ console.error('Organization not found');
+ return;
+ }
+
- const adminIds = data2.organizations[0].admins.map((admin: any) => admin._id);
+ interface Admin {
+ _id: string;
+ }
+ const adminIds = organization.admins.map((admin: Admin) => admin._id);
const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map((member: InterfaceMember) => {
const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id);
return {
...member,
userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User',
};
});
setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers);
setMembers(updatedMembers);
}
}, [data, data2]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (data && data2) { | |
| const adminIds = data2.organizations[0].admins.map((admin: any) => admin._id); | |
| const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map((member: InterfaceMember) => { | |
| const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id); | |
| return { | |
| ...member, | |
| userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User', | |
| }; | |
| }); | |
| setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| } | |
| }, [data]); | |
| }, [data, data2]); | |
| if (data && data2) { | |
| // Ensure organization exists | |
| const organization = data2.organizations?.[0]; | |
| if (!organization) { | |
| console.error('Organization not found'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| interface Admin { | |
| _id: string; | |
| } | |
| const adminIds = organization.admins.map((admin: Admin) => admin._id); | |
| const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map((member: InterfaceMember) => { | |
| const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id); | |
| return { | |
| ...member, | |
| userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User', | |
| }; | |
| }); | |
| setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| } | |
| }, [data, data2]); |
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (mode == 1) { | ||
| if (data2) { | ||
| setMembers(data2.organizations[0].admins); | ||
| const admins = data2.organizations[0].admins.map((admin: any) => { return { ...admin, userType: 'Admin' } }); | ||
| setMembers(admins); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve mode-based filtering implementation
The current implementation has several areas for improvement:
- Uses magic numbers for mode comparison
- Inconsistent type handling for admin mapping
- No cleanup for state updates
Consider these improvements:
+ // Add at the top of the file with other constants
+ const FILTER_MODES = {
+ ALL_MEMBERS: 0,
+ ADMINS: 1
+ } as const;
useEffect(() => {
- if (mode == 0) {
+ if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ALL_MEMBERS) {
if (data) {
setMembers(updatedMembers);
}
- } else if (mode == 1) {
+ } else if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ADMINS) {
if (data2) {
- const admins = data2.organizations[0].admins.map((admin: any) => { return { ...admin, userType: 'Admin' } });
+ const admins = data2.organizations[0].admins.map((admin: InterfaceMember) => ({
+ ...admin,
+ userType: 'Admin' as const
+ }));
setMembers(admins);
}
}
+ return () => {
+ // Cleanup to prevent state updates after unmount
+ setMembers([]);
+ };
}, [mode]);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx(3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx
[failure] 141-141:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
[failure] 169-169:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx (1)
Line range hint 139-172: Verify role display across different organizations
Since the original issue affected only certain organizations, please ensure the fix works consistently across different scenarios:
- Organizations with both admins and regular users
- Organizations with only regular users
- Organizations with only admin users
- Edge cases like organizations with no users
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now generate the final response:
Role display implementation appears consistent and well-handled
The implementation correctly handles different organization scenarios:
- Organizations with both admins and regular users: The code maps admin IDs from
data2.organizations[0].adminsand setsuserTypeaccordingly - Organizations with only admins: Handled by the
mode == 1condition which maps admins withuserType: 'Admin' - Organizations with only regular users: Default mapping sets non-admin users to
userType: 'User' - Edge case of no users: Implicitly handled as the mapping only occurs when
dataanddata2are available
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify role mapping implementation across different organizations
# Check for organizations with different user configurations
ast-grep --pattern $'const { data: data2 } = useQuery(ORGANIZATION_ADMINS_LIST, {
$$$
});'
# Check for role-related GraphQL queries
rg -A 5 'ORGANIZATION_ADMINS_LIST|ORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LIST'
# Look for potential role-related error handling
rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.ts' 'userType|role'
Length of output: 24134
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
[failure] 141-141:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
| @@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ | |||
| const [rowsPerPage, setRowsPerPage] = useState<number>(5); | |||
| const [members, setMembers] = useState([]); | |||
| const [mode, setMode] = useState<number>(0); | |||
| const [updatedMembers, setUpdatedMembers] = useState([]); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add type safety to the state variable
The new state variable should be properly typed to match the member interface.
- const [updatedMembers, setUpdatedMembers] = useState([]);
+ const [updatedMembers, setUpdatedMembers] = useState<InterfaceMember[]>([]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const [updatedMembers, setUpdatedMembers] = useState([]); | |
| const [updatedMembers, setUpdatedMembers] = useState<InterfaceMember[]>([]); |
| if (data) { | ||
| setMembers(data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges); | ||
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (mode == 1) { | ||
| if (data2) { | ||
| setMembers(data2.organizations[0].admins); | ||
| const admins = data2.organizations[0].admins.map((admin: any) => { | ||
| return { ...admin, userType: 'Admin' }; | ||
| }); | ||
| setMembers(admins); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve type safety and readability in filtering logic
The current implementation needs improvements in type safety and maintainability.
+ // Add at the top of the file with other constants
+ const FILTER_MODES = {
+ ALL_MEMBERS: 0,
+ ADMINS: 1
+ } as const;
useEffect(() => {
- if (mode == 0) {
+ if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ALL_MEMBERS) {
if (data) {
setMembers(updatedMembers);
}
- } else if (mode == 1) {
+ } else if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ADMINS) {
if (data2) {
+ const organization = data2.organizations?.[0];
+ if (!organization) {
+ console.error('Organization not found');
+ return;
+ }
- const admins = data2.organizations[0].admins.map((admin: any) => {
+ const admins = organization.admins.map((admin: InterfaceMember) => {
return { ...admin, userType: 'Admin' };
});
setMembers(admins);
}
}
}, [mode]);Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
[failure] 169-169:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
| if (data && data2) { | ||
| const adminIds = data2.organizations[0].admins.map( | ||
| (admin: any) => admin._id, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map( | ||
| (member: InterfaceMember) => { | ||
| const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id); | ||
| return { | ||
| ...member, | ||
| userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User', | ||
| }; | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
| setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers); | ||
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | ||
| } | ||
| }, [data]); | ||
| }, [data, data2]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add proper error handling and type safety to role mapping
While the role mapping logic addresses the core issue, it needs better error handling and type safety.
useEffect(() => {
if (data && data2) {
+ // Ensure organization exists
+ const organization = data2.organizations?.[0];
+ if (!organization) {
+ console.error('Organization not found');
+ return;
+ }
+
+ interface Admin {
+ _id: string;
+ }
- const adminIds = data2.organizations[0].admins.map((admin: any) => admin._id);
+ const adminIds = organization.admins.map((admin: Admin) => admin._id);
const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map(
(member: InterfaceMember) => {
const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id);
return {
...member,
userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User',
};
},
);
setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers);
setMembers(updatedMembers);
}
}, [data, data2]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (data && data2) { | |
| const adminIds = data2.organizations[0].admins.map( | |
| (admin: any) => admin._id, | |
| ); | |
| const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map( | |
| (member: InterfaceMember) => { | |
| const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id); | |
| return { | |
| ...member, | |
| userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User', | |
| }; | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| } | |
| }, [data]); | |
| }, [data, data2]); | |
| if (data && data2) { | |
| // Ensure organization exists | |
| const organization = data2.organizations?.[0]; | |
| if (!organization) { | |
| console.error('Organization not found'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| interface Admin { | |
| _id: string; | |
| } | |
| const adminIds = organization.admins.map((admin: Admin) => admin._id); | |
| const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map( | |
| (member: InterfaceMember) => { | |
| const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id); | |
| return { | |
| ...member, | |
| userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User', | |
| }; | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| } | |
| }, [data, data2]); |
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: Performs linting, formatting, type-checking, checking for different source and target branch
[failure] 141-141:
Unexpected any. Specify a different type
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx (2)
55-55: Add type safety to the state variable
The new state variable should be typed to match the InterfaceMember[] type for better type safety and to prevent potential runtime errors.
Line range hint 139-178: Verify role display across different organizations
While the implementation looks correct, let's verify that roles are displayed properly across different organizations.
✅ Verification successful
Role display implementation is consistent across the codebase
The changes in People.tsx are correctly implemented and align with other role handling patterns in the codebase:
- The admin role mapping is consistent with other components like
Users.tsxwhich uses similar role distinctions - The implementation properly handles organization-specific admin roles, similar to
OrganizationPeople.tsx - The simple
Admininterface used is appropriate as it only needs the_idfor role mapping
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related role display implementations in other components
rg -l "userType|role.*Admin" --type tsx
# Check for any similar role mapping patterns that might need the same fix
ast-grep --pattern 'useEffect($_) {
$$$
map($_, $_ => {
$$$
userType: $_
$$$
})
$$$
}'
Length of output: 178
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related role display implementations in other components with correct file extension
rg -l "userType|role.*Admin" --type ts --type tsx --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx'
# Check for similar role mapping patterns in TypeScript/React files
rg -U "useEffect.*userType.*Admin" --type ts --type tsx --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx'
# Find all files that might contain organization-related role handling
rg -l "organizations.*admin" --type ts --type tsx --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx'
Length of output: 651
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of userType in PeopleCard and Users components
rg -A 5 "userType" src/components/UserPortal/PeopleCard/PeopleCard.test.tsx src/screens/Users/Users.tsx
# Check how organization admins are handled in OrganizationPeople
rg -A 5 "organizations.*admin" src/screens/OrganizationPeople/OrganizationPeople.tsx
# Look for any interfaces or types defining admin roles
rg "interface.*Admin|type.*Admin" --type ts --type tsx --type-add 'tsx:*.tsx'
Length of output: 2313
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (mode == 1) { | ||
| if (data2) { | ||
| setMembers(data2.organizations[0].admins); | ||
| const admins = data2.organizations[0].admins.map( | ||
| (admin: InterfaceMember) => ({ | ||
| ...admin, | ||
| userType: 'Admin' as const, | ||
| }), | ||
| ); | ||
| setMembers(admins); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve code quality and type safety in filtering logic
Several improvements needed:
- Use strict equality (
===) for mode comparison - Replace magic numbers with constants
- Add null checks for organization access
Apply this diff to improve the code:
+ const FILTER_MODES = {
+ ALL_MEMBERS: 0,
+ ADMINS: 1
+ } as const;
useEffect(() => {
- if (mode == 0) {
+ if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ALL_MEMBERS) {
if (data) {
setMembers(updatedMembers);
}
- } else if (mode == 1) {
+ } else if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ADMINS) {
if (data2) {
+ const organization = data2.organizations?.[0];
+ if (!organization) {
+ console.error('Failed to load organization data');
+ return;
+ }
- const admins = data2.organizations[0].admins.map(
+ const admins = organization.admins.map(
(admin: InterfaceMember) => ({
...admin,
userType: 'Admin' as const,
}),
);
setMembers(admins);
}
}
}, [mode]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| } | |
| } else if (mode == 1) { | |
| if (data2) { | |
| setMembers(data2.organizations[0].admins); | |
| const admins = data2.organizations[0].admins.map( | |
| (admin: InterfaceMember) => ({ | |
| ...admin, | |
| userType: 'Admin' as const, | |
| }), | |
| ); | |
| setMembers(admins); | |
| const FILTER_MODES = { | |
| ALL_MEMBERS: 0, | |
| ADMINS: 1 | |
| } as const; | |
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| } | |
| } else if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ADMINS) { | |
| if (data2) { | |
| const organization = data2.organizations?.[0]; | |
| if (!organization) { | |
| console.error('Failed to load organization data'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| const admins = organization.admins.map( | |
| (admin: InterfaceMember) => ({ | |
| ...admin, | |
| userType: 'Admin' as const, | |
| }), | |
| ); | |
| setMembers(admins); |
| if (data && data2) { | ||
| interface Admin { | ||
| _id: string; | ||
| } | ||
| const adminIds = data2.organizations[0].admins.map( | ||
| (admin: Admin) => admin._id, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map( | ||
| (member: InterfaceMember) => { | ||
| const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id); | ||
| return { | ||
| ...member, | ||
| userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User', | ||
| }; | ||
| }, | ||
| ); | ||
| setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers); | ||
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | ||
| } | ||
| }, [data]); | ||
| }, [data, data2]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add error handling and null checks
The current implementation needs additional safeguards:
- Add null check for
organizations[0]access - Handle potential race conditions between data updates
- Add error logging for edge cases
Apply this diff to improve error handling:
useEffect(() => {
if (data && data2) {
+ // Ensure organization exists
+ const organization = data2.organizations?.[0];
+ if (!organization) {
+ console.error('Failed to load organization data');
+ return;
+ }
+
interface Admin {
_id: string;
}
- const adminIds = data2.organizations[0].admins.map(
+ const adminIds = organization.admins.map(
(admin: Admin) => admin._id,
);
+ try {
const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map(
(member: InterfaceMember) => {
const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id);
return {
...member,
userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User',
};
},
);
setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers);
setMembers(updatedMembers);
+ } catch (error) {
+ console.error('Failed to process member data:', error);
+ }
}
}, [data, data2]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (data && data2) { | |
| interface Admin { | |
| _id: string; | |
| } | |
| const adminIds = data2.organizations[0].admins.map( | |
| (admin: Admin) => admin._id, | |
| ); | |
| const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map( | |
| (member: InterfaceMember) => { | |
| const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id); | |
| return { | |
| ...member, | |
| userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User', | |
| }; | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| } | |
| }, [data]); | |
| }, [data, data2]); | |
| if (data && data2) { | |
| // Ensure organization exists | |
| const organization = data2.organizations?.[0]; | |
| if (!organization) { | |
| console.error('Failed to load organization data'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| interface Admin { | |
| _id: string; | |
| } | |
| const adminIds = organization.admins.map( | |
| (admin: Admin) => admin._id, | |
| ); | |
| try { | |
| const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map( | |
| (member: InterfaceMember) => { | |
| const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id); | |
| return { | |
| ...member, | |
| userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User', | |
| }; | |
| }, | |
| ); | |
| setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| } catch (error) { | |
| console.error('Failed to process member data:', error); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, [data, data2]); |
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx (1)
165-167: Enhance error handling with specific error typesThe current catch block could be more informative about the type of error that occurred.
Consider this improvement:
- } catch (error) { - console.error('Failed to process member data:', error); + } catch (error) { + if (error instanceof TypeError) { + console.error('Invalid data structure while processing members:', error.message); + } else { + console.error('Unexpected error while processing member data:', + error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error) + ); + }
| const admins = data2.organizations[0].admins.map( | ||
| (admin: InterfaceMember) => ({ | ||
| ...admin, | ||
| userType: 'Admin' as const, | ||
| }), | ||
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix inconsistent organization access
There's an inconsistency in how the organization data is accessed. After checking for the organization's existence, the code still directly accesses data2.organizations[0] instead of using the validated organization variable.
Apply this fix:
- const admins = data2.organizations[0].admins.map(
+ const admins = organization.admins.map(
(admin: InterfaceMember) => ({
...admin,
userType: 'Admin' as const,
}),
);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const admins = data2.organizations[0].admins.map( | |
| (admin: InterfaceMember) => ({ | |
| ...admin, | |
| userType: 'Admin' as const, | |
| }), | |
| ); | |
| const admins = organization.admins.map( | |
| (admin: InterfaceMember) => ({ | |
| ...admin, | |
| userType: 'Admin' as const, | |
| }), | |
| ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx (4)
53-55: LGTM! Consider consistent initializationThe type safety improvements are good. For consistency, consider initializing both state variables in a single declaration block.
- const [members, setMembers] = useState<InterfaceMember[]>([]); - const [mode, setMode] = useState<number>(0); - const [updatedMembers, setUpdatedMembers] = useState<InterfaceMember[]>([]); + // Group related state variables + const [members, setMembers] = useState<InterfaceMember[]>([]); + const [updatedMembers, setUpdatedMembers] = useState<InterfaceMember[]>([]); + const [mode, setMode] = useState<number>(0);
139-169: Consider enhancing error handling and cleanupThe error handling and type safety improvements are good. Consider these additional enhancements:
useEffect(() => { if (data && data2) { const organization = data2.organizations?.[0]; if (!organization) { - console.error('Failed to load organization data'); + console.error(new Error('Failed to load organization data')); return; } interface InterfaceAdmin { _id: string; } const adminIds = organization.admins.map( (admin: InterfaceAdmin) => admin._id, ); try { const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map( (member: InterfaceMember) => { const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id); return { ...member, userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User', }; }, ); setUpdatedMembers(updatedMembers); setMembers(updatedMembers); } catch (error) { - console.error('Failed to process member data:', error); + console.error(new Error(`Failed to process member data: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`)); } } + return () => { + // Cleanup to prevent state updates after unmount + setUpdatedMembers([]); + setMembers([]); + }; }, [data, data2]);
171-174: Consider improving constant declarationGood addition of FILTER_MODES constant. Consider these improvements:
+ // At the top with other interfaces + const FILTER_MODES = { + ALL_MEMBERS: 0, + ADMINS: 1, + } as const; + + type FilterMode = typeof FILTER_MODES[keyof typeof FILTER_MODES]; + export default function people(): JSX.Element { // ... existing code ... - const [mode, setMode] = useState<number>(0); + const [mode, setMode] = useState<FilterMode>(FILTER_MODES.ALL_MEMBERS); - const FILTER_MODES = { - ALL_MEMBERS: 0, - ADMINS: 1, - } as const;
181-197: Consider performance optimization and error handlingThe filtering logic is good but could be optimized:
+ // Add at the top of the file + import { useMemo } from 'react'; useEffect(() => { if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ALL_MEMBERS) { if (data) { setMembers(updatedMembers); } } else if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ADMINS) { if (data2) { const organization = data2.organizations?.[0]; if (!organization) { console.error('Organization not found'); return; } - const admins = organization.admins.map((admin: InterfaceMember) => ({ - ...admin, - userType: 'Admin' as const, - })); - setMembers(admins); + try { + const admins = organization.admins.map((admin: InterfaceMember) => ({ + ...admin, + userType: 'Admin' as const, + })); + setMembers(admins); + } catch (error) { + console.error(new Error(`Failed to process admin data: ${error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error)}`)); + } } } + return () => { + // Cleanup to prevent state updates after unmount + setMembers([]); + }; }, [mode]); + // Memoize filtered members + const filteredMembers = useMemo(() => members, [members]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx (1)
154-161: Verify role display functionality
Let's verify that the role assignment logic works correctly across different scenarios.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the shell script results, I can now verify the role display functionality. The code shows:
-
The role assignment logic is correctly implemented using two GraphQL queries:
ORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LISTfetches all membersORGANIZATION_ADMINS_LISTfetches admin IDs
-
The role mapping is properly done in the code:
const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map(
(member: InterfaceMember) => {
const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id);
return {
...member,
userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User',
};
},- The interface definitions and GraphQL queries are properly structured to support this functionality.
Role display functionality works as intended
The implementation correctly maps organization members to their roles by cross-referencing the member list with admin IDs, and appropriately assigns 'Admin' or 'User' as the userType.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify role assignment implementation across the codebase
# Check for role-related type definitions
echo "Checking role-related type definitions..."
rg -A 5 "interface.*Member"
# Check for role/userType usage in components
echo "Checking role/userType usage in components..."
rg -A 5 "userType.*=.*('Admin'|'User')"
# Check for role-related GraphQL queries
echo "Checking role-related GraphQL queries..."
rg -A 10 "ORGANIZATIONS_MEMBER_CONNECTION_LIST|ORGANIZATION_ADMINS_LIST"
Length of output: 30120
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.test.tsx (1)
Line range hint
17-121: Mock data should include explicit role/userType fieldsThe mock data structure doesn't include explicit role or userType fields in the response, which are crucial for testing the role display functionality this PR aims to fix. This could lead to brittle tests that pass even if the component is using hardcoded values instead of actual role data.
Consider updating the mock data to include role information. Example structure:
edges: [ { _id: '64001660a711c62d5b4076a2', firstName: 'Noble', lastName: 'Mittal', image: null, email: '[email protected]', createdAt: '2023-03-02T03:22:08.101Z', + role: 'USER', // or userType, depending on your API structure },
| test('Members should be rendered with correct user type', async () => { | ||
| render( | ||
| <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}> | ||
| <BrowserRouter> | ||
| <Provider store={store}> | ||
| <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> | ||
| <People /> | ||
| </I18nextProvider> | ||
| </Provider> | ||
| </BrowserRouter> | ||
| </MockedProvider>, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| await wait(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('Admin')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.getByText('User')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Strengthen the test coverage for role display functionality
The current test case is insufficient for verifying the role display bug fix:
- It only checks for the presence of role text without verifying if roles are correctly associated with specific users
- It doesn't test the specific scenario where roles weren't displaying in certain organizations
- Missing negative test cases
Consider enhancing the test with these scenarios:
test('Members should be rendered with correct user type', async () => {
render(
<MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}>
<BrowserRouter>
<Provider store={store}>
<I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}>
<People />
</I18nextProvider>
</Provider>
</BrowserRouter>
</MockedProvider>,
);
await wait();
// Verify specific user-role associations
const nobleElement = screen.getByText('Noble Admin');
expect(nobleElement.closest('tr')).toHaveTextContent('Admin');
const regularUserElement = screen.getByText('Noble Mittal');
expect(regularUserElement.closest('tr')).toHaveTextContent('User');
// Test role visibility across different organizations
// This would require additional mock data for different orgs
});
test('Should handle missing role data gracefully', async () => {
// Add test with mock data missing role information
});There was a problem hiding this comment.
? This will not work roles are not in table
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@aditya-bansal-7, thank you for the clarification. Since roles are not displayed in the table, the suggested test adjustments won't be applicable. If there's anything else I can assist with, please let me know.
✏️ Learnings added
Learnt from: aditya-bansal-7
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2459
File: src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.test.tsx:226-242
Timestamp: 2024-11-24T19:35:44.807Z
Learning: In the `People` component, roles are not displayed in the table, so tests related to role display should account for this.
Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx (1)
139-169: Enhance error handling and optimize performanceWhile the implementation is good, consider these improvements:
- Use more specific error types
- Memoize the processed data
- Add more descriptive error messages
+ const memoizedProcessMembers = useMemo(() => { if (data && data2) { const organization = data2.organizations?.[0]; if (!organization) { - console.error('Failed to load organization data'); + console.error('Organization not found in data2.organizations array'); return []; } interface InterfaceAdmin { _id: string; } const adminIds = organization.admins.map( (admin: InterfaceAdmin) => admin._id, ); try { return data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map( (member: InterfaceMember) => { const isAdmin = adminIds.includes(member._id); return { ...member, userType: isAdmin ? 'Admin' : 'User', }; }, ); } catch (error) { - console.error('Failed to process member data:', error); + console.error( + 'Error processing member data:', + error instanceof Error ? error.message : String(error), + '\nStack:', error instanceof Error ? error.stack : 'No stack trace' + ); + return []; } } + return []; + }, [data, data2]); + useEffect(() => { + setUpdatedMembers(memoizedProcessMembers); + setMembers(memoizedProcessMembers); + }, [memoizedProcessMembers]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx (3)
55-55: LGTM! Well-typed state variable.
The new state variable is properly typed with InterfaceMember[] interface, ensuring type safety.
171-174: LGTM! Well-defined filter mode constants.
The FILTER_MODES constant is properly typed with const assertion, providing type safety and preventing magic numbers.
154-161: Verify role assignment logic
The role assignment logic looks correct, but let's verify that it properly handles all user types mentioned in the PR objectives (Superadmin, Admin, User).
✅ Verification successful
Let me try a different search pattern to gather more information about the role handling in the codebase.
Let me try one more search to specifically look for the role-related types and interfaces in the codebase.
Based on the previous search results and the code snippet from the review comment, I can now generate the final response:
Role assignment logic is correctly implemented
The implementation correctly handles the binary role assignment (Admin/User) based on the adminIds array. The code maps each member and sets their userType appropriately:
- If the member's ID is in
adminIds, they get the 'Admin' role - Otherwise, they get the 'User' role
This aligns with the schema's UserType enum seen in the codebase and maintains proper role distinction within the organization context.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all role/userType assignments in the codebase
echo "Searching for role assignments..."
rg -A 2 "userType.*=.*['\"](?:Admin|Superadmin|User)['\"]"
# Search for role-related interfaces and types
echo "Searching for role-related type definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_$ { $$$userType: string$$$ }'
Length of output: 308
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for role/userType related code with broader patterns
echo "Searching for role/userType related code..."
rg -i "usertype|role" -A 3
# Search for type definitions containing Admin or User
echo "Searching for type definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_$ = "Admin" | "User" | "Superadmin"'
# Search for interfaces with role or userType
echo "Searching for interfaces..."
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_$ {
$$$
role?: $_$;
$$$
}'
Length of output: 105733
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for UserType enum and its usage
echo "Searching for UserType enum..."
ast-grep --pattern 'enum UserType {
$$$
}'
# Search for role-related type definitions
echo "Searching for role type definitions..."
ast-grep --pattern 'type $_$ = {
$$$
userType: $_$;
$$$
}'
# Search for role assignments in the codebase
echo "Searching for role assignments..."
rg -A 2 "userType.*=.*(?:Admin|User|Superadmin)" src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx
Length of output: 440
| if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ALL_MEMBERS) { | ||
| if (data) { | ||
| setMembers(data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges); | ||
| setMembers(updatedMembers as []); | ||
| } | ||
| } else if (mode == 1) { | ||
| } else if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ADMINS) { | ||
| if (data2) { | ||
| setMembers(data2.organizations[0].admins); | ||
| const organization = data2.organizations?.[0]; | ||
| if (!organization) { | ||
| console.error('Organization not found'); | ||
| return; | ||
| } | ||
| const admins = organization.admins.map((admin: InterfaceMember) => ({ | ||
| ...admin, | ||
| userType: 'Admin' as const, | ||
| })); | ||
| setMembers(admins); | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix type casting and add effect cleanup
Several issues need to be addressed:
- Remove unnecessary type casting of
updatedMembers - Add cleanup to prevent memory leaks
- Simplify the admin filtering logic
useEffect(() => {
if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ALL_MEMBERS) {
if (data) {
- setMembers(updatedMembers as []);
+ setMembers(updatedMembers);
}
} else if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ADMINS) {
if (data2) {
const organization = data2.organizations?.[0];
if (!organization) {
console.error('Organization not found');
return;
}
- const admins = organization.admins.map((admin: InterfaceMember) => ({
- ...admin,
- userType: 'Admin' as const,
- }));
+ const admins = organization.admins.map((admin: InterfaceMember) => {
+ return { ...admin, userType: 'Admin' as const };
+ });
setMembers(admins);
}
}
+ return () => {
+ // Cleanup to prevent state updates after unmount
+ setMembers([]);
+ };
}, [mode, data, data2, updatedMembers]);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ALL_MEMBERS) { | |
| if (data) { | |
| setMembers(data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges); | |
| setMembers(updatedMembers as []); | |
| } | |
| } else if (mode == 1) { | |
| } else if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ADMINS) { | |
| if (data2) { | |
| setMembers(data2.organizations[0].admins); | |
| const organization = data2.organizations?.[0]; | |
| if (!organization) { | |
| console.error('Organization not found'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| const admins = organization.admins.map((admin: InterfaceMember) => ({ | |
| ...admin, | |
| userType: 'Admin' as const, | |
| })); | |
| setMembers(admins); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| useEffect(() => { | |
| if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ALL_MEMBERS) { | |
| if (data) { | |
| setMembers(updatedMembers); | |
| } | |
| } else if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ADMINS) { | |
| if (data2) { | |
| const organization = data2.organizations?.[0]; | |
| if (!organization) { | |
| console.error('Organization not found'); | |
| return; | |
| } | |
| const admins = organization.admins.map((admin: InterfaceMember) => { | |
| return { ...admin, userType: 'Admin' as const }; | |
| }); | |
| setMembers(admins); | |
| } | |
| } | |
| return () => { | |
| // Cleanup to prevent state updates after unmount | |
| setMembers([]); | |
| }; | |
| }, [mode, data, data2, updatedMembers]); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx (2)
139-169: Add null check for edges array.The role mapping logic looks good overall, but consider adding a null check for
edgesto handle edge cases where the connection might be empty.- const updatedMembers = data.organizationsMemberConnection.edges.map( + const edges = data.organizationsMemberConnection?.edges; + if (!edges) { + console.error('No member data available'); + return; + } + const updatedMembers = edges.map(
171-197: Add cleanup function to useEffect.The filtering logic looks good, but consider adding a cleanup function to prevent state updates after component unmount.
useEffect(() => { if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ALL_MEMBERS) { if (data) { setMembers(updatedMembers); } } else if (mode === FILTER_MODES.ADMINS) { if (data2) { const organization = data2.organizations?.[0]; if (!organization) { console.error('Organization not found'); return; } const admins = organization.admins.map((admin: InterfaceMember) => ({ ...admin, userType: 'Admin' as const, })); setMembers(admins); } } + return () => { + setMembers([]); + }; }, [mode]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.tsx (2)
53-55: LGTM! State management is well-structured.
The state variables are properly typed with InterfaceMember[], providing good type safety for member data management.
139-197: Verify the role display functionality.
The changes look good and address the role display issue mentioned in PR #2459. Let's verify the implementation:
✅ Verification successful
Role display implementation verified successfully
The implementation in People.tsx correctly handles role assignment and display:
- Properly maps admin status to user types ('Admin' or 'User') based on organization admin list
- Consistent with the application's role management patterns across the codebase
- Error handling is implemented for missing organization data
- Type safety is maintained through proper interfaces
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the role display implementation across the codebase
# Check for any hardcoded role assignments that might conflict
rg -l "userType.*=.*['\"](?:Admin|User)['\"]" --type ts --type tsx
# Check for consistent role handling in related components
ast-grep --pattern 'const $COMPONENT = $_ => {
$$$
userType
$$$
}'
Length of output: 175
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to verify role-related implementations
# Search for userType patterns without file type restrictions
rg -l "userType.*['\"](?:Admin|User)['\"]"
# Check for role-related component implementations
rg -A 5 "userType.*="
# Look for any other role management logic
rg -A 3 "(?i)admin.*role|role.*admin|user.*role|role.*user"
Length of output: 53053
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2459 +/- ##
=====================================================
- Coverage 95.82% 83.71% -12.11%
=====================================================
Files 295 312 +17
Lines 7037 8137 +1100
Branches 1520 1835 +315
=====================================================
+ Hits 6743 6812 +69
- Misses 98 1185 +1087
+ Partials 196 140 -56 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
@palisadoes review this |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.test.tsx (1)
226-227: Remove extra blank lineThere's an unnecessary blank line that should be removed.
- test('Members should be rendered with correct user type', async () => { + test('Members should be rendered with correct user type', async () => {🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 226-227: Delete
⏎··(prettier/prettier)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.test.tsx (1)
Learnt from: aditya-bansal-7
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2459
File: src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.test.tsx:226-242
Timestamp: 2024-11-24T19:35:45.258Z
Learning: In the `People` component, roles are not displayed in the table, so tests related to role display should account for this.
🪛 eslint
src/screens/UserPortal/People/People.test.tsx
[error] 226-227: Delete ⏎··
(prettier/prettier)
|
|
||
| test('Members should be rendered with correct user type', async () => { | ||
| render( | ||
| <MockedProvider addTypename={false} link={link}> | ||
| <BrowserRouter> | ||
| <Provider store={store}> | ||
| <I18nextProvider i18n={i18nForTest}> | ||
| <People /> | ||
| </I18nextProvider> | ||
| </Provider> | ||
| </BrowserRouter> | ||
| </MockedProvider>, | ||
| ); | ||
|
|
||
| await wait(); | ||
| expect(screen.queryByText('Admin')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.queryByText('User')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| }); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Test case appears inconsistent with component behavior
Based on the previous feedback and learnings, roles are not displayed in the table. However, this test assumes the presence of 'Admin' and 'User' text in the document. This might lead to:
- False positives if these strings appear elsewhere in the component
- Test passing even if the role display bug isn't fixed
Consider revising the test to:
- Verify the actual fix implemented in the People component
- Test role visibility across different organizations (the original bug scenario)
- Add assertions that validate the specific user-role relationships
Would you like me to help draft a more targeted test case once you clarify how roles are being displayed in the updated component?
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 226-227: Delete ⏎··
(prettier/prettier)
| await wait(); | ||
| expect(screen.queryByText('Admin')).toBeInTheDocument(); | ||
| expect(screen.queryByText('User')).toBeInTheDocument(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Strengthen test assertions
The current assertions using queryByText are too broad and may pass even if roles appear in unintended locations.
Consider:
- Using more specific queries that target the intended elements
- Adding test data for multiple organizations to verify the original bug scenario
- Including negative test cases
Example structure:
// Verify role display in specific organization
await wait();
const org1Members = screen.getByTestId('org-1-members');
// Add your specific assertions based on how roles are actually displayed
// Verify role display in different organization
const org2Members = screen.getByTestId('org-2-members');
// Add your specific assertions
// Negative test case
expect(screen.queryByTestId('invalid-role')).not.toBeInTheDocument();
Please read: |
|
@palisadoes check |
|
There isn’t an issue assigned to you for this PR. Please follow the guidelines in our PR_GUIDELINES.md file. We have the procedures in place so that everyone has a fair chance of contributing. I will be closing this pull request. Please follow the procedures and resubmit when ready. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Bug fix
Issue Number:
Fixes #2455
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
2024-11-20.23-45-26.mp4
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
no
Summary
This PR addresses the issue in the Talawa User Portal where the "Role" column is not displaying the correct roles for users in the 'People' section for some organizations
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
no
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests