Chore/css changes #2466
Chore/css changes #2466
Conversation
Bumps [sass](https://github.com/sass/dart-sass) from 1.80.6 to 1.80.7. - [Release notes](https://github.com/sass/dart-sass/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/sass/dart-sass/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](sass/dart-sass@1.80.6...1.80.7) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: sass dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…oesFoundation#2434) Bumps [eslint-plugin-import](https://github.com/import-js/eslint-plugin-import) from 2.30.0 to 2.31.0. - [Release notes](https://github.com/import-js/eslint-plugin-import/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/import-js/eslint-plugin-import/blob/main/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](import-js/eslint-plugin-import@v2.30.0...v2.31.0) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: eslint-plugin-import dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…dation#2435) Bumps [@mui/x-charts](https://github.com/mui/mui-x/tree/HEAD/packages/x-charts) from 7.22.1 to 7.22.2. - [Release notes](https://github.com/mui/mui-x/releases) - [Changelog](https://github.com/mui/mui-x/blob/v7.22.2/CHANGELOG.md) - [Commits](https://github.com/mui/mui-x/commits/v7.22.2/packages/x-charts) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: "@mui/x-charts" dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
…dation#2436) Bumps [@types/react](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/tree/HEAD/types/react) from 18.3.3 to 18.3.12. - [Release notes](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/releases) - [Commits](https://github.com/DefinitelyTyped/DefinitelyTyped/commits/HEAD/types/react) --- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: "@types/react" dependency-type: direct:development update-type: version-update:semver-patch ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces a series of changes across multiple components and stylesheets, primarily focusing on updating CSS class names, restructuring import paths, and enhancing styling consistency through the use of CSS variables. Key components affected include Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 28
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (32)
src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css (1)
Line range hint
1-65: Consider implementing a comprehensive color systemSince this PR aims to improve accessibility for color-blind users, consider implementing a more comprehensive color system:
- Define semantic color variables (e.g.,
--color-primary,--color-text-primary)- Include contrast-safe color combinations
- Document color usage patterns
This would make it easier to:
- Maintain consistent accessible colors across the application
- Test and verify color combinations
- Make future accessibility improvements
src/components/EventCalendar/EventHeader.tsx (3)
Line range hint
58-62: Consider enhancing the search button's accessibilityWhile updating the CSS class, consider adding ARIA labels for screen readers and ensuring sufficient color contrast for the search icon.
<Button className={styles.searchbutton} style={{ marginBottom: '10px' }} + aria-label="Search events" > <Search /> </Button>
Line range hint
114-119: Improve color accessibility for the Create Event buttonSince this PR focuses on color-blind accessibility, the
variant="success"might not provide sufficient color contrast or distinction for color-blind users. Consider:
- Using a more accessible color scheme defined in your CSS modules
- Adding a visual indicator beyond just color (like an icon)
- Ensuring WCAG 2.1 compliant contrast ratios
<Button - variant="success" className={styles.createButton} onClick={showInviteModal} data-testid="createEventModalBtn" + aria-label="Create new event" > + <i className="fas fa-plus-circle" aria-hidden="true"></i> Create Event </Button>
Line range hint
1-124: Consider implementing keyboard navigation improvementsWhile updating the styling for accessibility, it would be beneficial to enhance keyboard navigation between the search, dropdowns, and create button elements.
Consider implementing:
- Logical tab order
- Focus indicators
- Keyboard shortcuts for common actions
src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.module.css (1)
93-104: Improve button interactivity and accessibilityThe email button needs hover and focus states for better user interaction feedback. Also, consider making the positioning more flexible.
.email_button { position: absolute; z-index: 10; bottom: 0; right: 0; height: 100%; display: flex; background-color: var(--search-button-bg); border-color: var(--search-button-border); justify-content: center; align-items: center; + transition: background-color 0.2s ease; + cursor: pointer; } +.email_button:hover, +.email_button:focus { + background-color: var(--subtle-blue-grey-hover); + outline: 2px solid var(--subtle-blue-grey); + outline-offset: 2px; +}src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.module.css (3)
Line range hint
69-73: Resolve duplicate .sampleOrgSection class declarationThere are two declarations of
.sampleOrgSectionwith different properties. This could lead to specificity issues and unexpected behavior.Merge the declarations into a single class:
.sampleOrgSection { font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; width: 100%; display: grid; grid-template-columns: repeat(1, 1fr); row-gap: 1em; justify-content: center; flex-direction: column; align-items: center; }Also applies to: 84-91
Line range hint
75-83: Standardize color values and enhance button accessibilityThe button styles use inconsistent color formats (#707070 vs 'grey') and might need accessibility improvements.
Consider these improvements:
.sampleOrgCreationBtn { width: 100%; background-color: transparent; - color: #707070; - border-color: #707070; + color: var(--text-color, #555555); + border-color: var(--border-color, #555555); display: flex; justify-content: center; align-items: center; } .sampleHover:hover { - border-color: grey; - color: grey; + border-color: var(--hover-color, #707070); + color: var(--hover-color, #707070); + background-color: rgba(85, 85, 85, 0.1); }Consider:
- Using CSS custom properties for consistent color management
- Adding focus states for keyboard navigation
- Ensuring sufficient contrast for text and borders
Also applies to: 92-95
Line range hint
1-1: Consider implementing a comprehensive color systemTo better support accessibility and maintain consistency, consider implementing a systematic approach to colors:
- Create a central color palette using CSS custom properties:
:root { /* Primary colors */ --color-primary: #555555; --color-primary-hover: #707070; /* Text colors */ --text-primary: #555555; --text-secondary: #707070; /* Border colors */ --border-primary: #555555; --border-secondary: #707070; /* States */ --hover-background: rgba(85, 85, 85, 0.1); }
- Document color contrast ratios and accessibility compliance
- Create a style guide for color usage in different UI components
src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.module.css (2)
Line range hint
247-264: Enhance loader visibility for color-blind usersThe loader uses an orange color (#febc59) which might not be easily distinguishable for users with certain types of color blindness. Consider using a color with higher contrast or adding additional visual indicators.
.loader { /* ... other properties ... */ - border-left: 1.1em solid #febc59; + border-left: 1.1em solid var(--loader-color, #2d5ba3); + /* Alternatively, consider adding animation scale or opacity changes */ }
Line range hint
1-383: Implement a comprehensive color accessibility systemTo better achieve the PR's objective of improving accessibility for color-blind individuals, consider:
- Implementing a consistent color system using CSS variables
- Adding ARIA attributes for interactive elements
- Testing with color blindness simulation tools
- Following WCAG 2.1 Level AA guidelines for color contrast
Consider creating a separate color tokens file:
:root { /* Primary colors with accessible alternatives */ --primary-color: #4a90e2; --primary-color-alt: #2d5ba3; /* Text colors with guaranteed contrast ratios */ --text-primary: #2c2c2c; --text-secondary: #595959; /* Border colors with sufficient contrast */ --border-light: #d1d3d8; --border-medium: #a4a6ac; }src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css (1)
Line range hint
418-435: Add non-color indicators for event typesCurrently, event types are distinguished solely by color, which isn't accessible for color-blind users. Consider adding patterns, icons, or labels to supplement the color coding.
.orgEvent__color { height: 15px; width: 40px; background-color: rgba(82, 172, 255, 0.5); border-radius: 10px; + /* Add distinctive pattern */ + background-image: linear-gradient(45deg, transparent 50%, rgba(0,0,0,0.1) 50%); + background-size: 10px 10px; } .holidays__color { height: 15px; width: 40px; background: rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.15); border-radius: 10px; + /* Add distinctive pattern */ + background-image: linear-gradient(90deg, transparent 50%, rgba(0,0,0,0.1) 50%); + background-size: 10px 10px; } .userEvents__color { height: 15px; width: 40px; background: rgba(146, 200, 141, 0.5); border-radius: 10px; + /* Add distinctive pattern */ + background-image: linear-gradient(0deg, transparent 50%, rgba(0,0,0,0.1) 50%); + background-size: 10px 10px; }src/components/Venues/VenueModal.tsx (3)
165-165: Consider additional accessibility improvementsWhile updating the close button styling, consider adding the following accessibility enhancements:
- Add
aria-label="Close modal"for screen readers- Ensure the new color scheme provides sufficient contrast ratio
- Consider adding a visible text label alongside the icon for better clarity
<Button variant="danger" onClick={onHide} className={styles.closeButton} data-testid="createVenueModalCloseBtn" + aria-label="Close modal" > - <i className="fa fa-times" /> + <i className="fa fa-times" aria-hidden="true" /> + <span className="visually-hidden">Close</span> </Button>
263-263: Enhance button accessibility and semanticsThe class name change from
greenregbtntoaddButtonis good for semantics, but consider these additional improvements:
- Add
aria-busy={loading}for screen readers during submission- Use semantic colors that work well for color-blind users
- Consider adding a loading spinner for visual feedback
<Button type="submit" className={styles.addButton} value={edit ? 'editVenue' : 'createVenue'} data-testid={edit ? 'updateVenueBtn' : 'createVenueBtn'} onClick={handleSubmit} disabled={loading} + aria-busy={loading} > - {edit ? t('editVenue') : t('createVenue')} + {loading ? ( + <> + <span className="spinner-border spinner-border-sm me-2" role="status" aria-hidden="true" /> + {edit ? t('editingVenue') : t('creatingVenue')} + </> + ) : ( + edit ? t('editVenue') : t('createVenue') + )} </Button>
Line range hint
1-274: Consider comprehensive accessibility improvementsWhile the color scheme changes are good, consider these additional accessibility improvements throughout the modal:
- Add proper form validation ARIA attributes
- Improve image upload feedback for screen readers
- Add descriptive labels for all interactive elements
- Ensure proper heading hierarchy in the modal
Example improvements for the image preview section:
{venueImage && ( - <div className={styles.preview}> + <div className={styles.preview} role="region" aria-label="Venue image preview"> <img src={imageURL} - alt="Venue Image Preview" + alt={`Preview of ${name || 'venue'}`} /> <button className={styles.closeButtonP} onClick={clearImageInput} data-testid="closeimage" + aria-label="Remove venue image" > - <i className="fa fa-times"></i> + <i className="fa fa-times" aria-hidden="true"></i> + <span className="visually-hidden">Remove image</span> </button> </div> )}src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.tsx (1)
231-231: Consider using a distinct style class for action buttons.Using
styles.dropdownfor an action button might not be semantically correct and could affect the visual hierarchy. Consider creating a dedicated style class for primary action buttons.-className={styles.dropdown} +className={styles.actionButton}src/screens/OrganizationFunds/OrganizationFunds.tsx (2)
17-17: Consider documenting the color scheme migrationThe migration to global styles aligns with improving color-blind accessibility. However, to ensure maintainability:
- Document the color scheme choices and their accessibility considerations in the codebase
- Consider adding color contrast validation tests
Line range hint
1-386: Consider adding ARIA attributes for enhanced accessibilityWhile the color scheme changes improve visual accessibility, consider these additional improvements:
- Add aria-label to the search input
- Ensure DataGrid announces sort state changes to screen readers
- Add aria-expanded state to the dropdown
<Form.Control type="name" placeholder={tCommon('searchByName')} autoComplete="off" required className={styles.inputField} value={searchTerm} onChange={(e) => setSearchTerm(e.target.value)} data-testid="searchByName" + aria-label={tCommon('searchByName')} />src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx (2)
Line range hint
192-221: Consider more generic class names for better reusabilityWhile the new class names are descriptive, they're too specific to this component. Consider using more generic names that can be reused across similar layouts.
-<div className={styles.btnsContainerBlockAndUnblock}> - <div className={styles.inputContainerBlockAndUnblock}> - <div className={styles.inputBlockAndUnblock}> +<div className={styles.actionButtonsContainer}> + <div className={styles.searchInputContainer}> + <div className={styles.searchInputWrapper}>
Accessibility improvements needed for interactive elements
Several accessibility concerns need to be addressed:
- The search button has
tabIndex={-1}which removes it from keyboard navigation- Dropdowns have
aria-expandedbut lack other required ARIA attributes likearia-labeloraria-controls- Form.Control lacks explicit label association and aria-label
- No focus styles defined in the CSS module
- Table headers lack
aria-sortattributes despite having sorting functionalityRequired changes:
- Remove
tabIndex={-1}from the search button- Add proper ARIA labels to dropdowns and their controls
- Associate Form.Control with labels using htmlFor/id
- Add focus styles in CSS
- Add appropriate aria-sort to sortable table headers
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
192-346: Comprehensive accessibility verification neededSince this PR focuses on improving accessibility for color-blind users, please ensure:
- All interactive elements have sufficient color contrast
- Color is not the only means of conveying information
- Focus indicators are visible
- Text remains readable with different color vision deficiencies
Consider using tools like Lighthouse or axe for automated accessibility testing.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any hardcoded colors that might bypass the accessibility improvements echo "Checking for hardcoded colors..." rg -i "color:|background:|border:" "src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx" # Check for proper semantic HTML usage echo "Checking semantic HTML..." rg "<div.*role=" "src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx"Length of output: 263
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for color-related CSS classes and styles echo "Checking CSS imports and styles..." rg -l "styles\." "src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx" cat "src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.module.css" 2>/dev/null || true # Check for accessibility attributes echo "Checking accessibility attributes..." rg -i "aria-|role=|tabindex" "src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx" # Check form control elements echo "Checking form controls..." ast-grep --pattern 'Form.Control { $$$ }'Length of output: 2111
src/style/app.module.css (4)
498-520: Improve table row state indicators for color-blind usersWhile the focus states are well-defined, the table row states rely heavily on color changes which might be insufficient for color-blind users.
Consider adding:
- Left border or icons to indicate active/hover states
- Subtle patterns or gradients
- Additional visual indicators beyond color
.custom_table tbody tr:hover { background-color: var(--grey-bg-color); box-shadow: 0 0 0 1px rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.1); + border-left: 3px solid var(--bs-primary); + position: relative; } .custom_table tbody tr:hover::before { + content: "►"; + position: absolute; + left: -20px; + color: var(--bs-primary); }
553-574: Enhance text and border contrast for better readabilityThe use of pure black text (#000000) and light borders might cause readability issues for some users.
Consider:
- Using a softer black for text
- Increasing border contrast
- Adding table row separators
.listTable { width: 100%; box-sizing: border-box; background: #ffffff; - border: 1px solid #0000001f; + border: 1px solid rgba(0, 0, 0, 0.2); border-radius: 24px; } .requestsTable thead th { font-size: 20px; font-weight: 400; line-height: 24px; letter-spacing: 0em; text-align: left; - color: #000000; + color: #2d2d2d; - border-bottom: 1px solid #dddddd; + border-bottom: 2px solid #c4c4c4; padding: 1.5rem; }
Line range hint
1-640: Recommend comprehensive color palette testingTo ensure the CSS changes truly improve accessibility for color-blind users, consider the following steps:
- Test the color palette with color blindness simulation tools
- Verify contrast ratios meet WCAG 2.1 standards
- Add visual patterns or icons to complement color-based indicators
Tools recommended:
- WebAIM Contrast Checker
- Colorblinding (Chrome extension)
- Color Oracle (Desktop application)
Color variables need standardization and contrast improvements
Based on the verification results, there are several issues with color usage:
Inconsistent color variable naming:
- Multiple similar colors defined differently:
--dropdown-hover-color,--grey-bg-color,--tablerow-bg-color- Bootstrap variables mixed with custom variables
Potential contrast issues:
- Direct usage of
#fffandrgba(255, 255, 255, ...)without contrast checks- Light colors like
#f8f9fa,#f2f2f2used for text/backgroundsHardcoded colors:
- Many instances of hardcoded hex values like
#31bb6b,#707070,#555555- Duplicate color definitions that could be consolidated into variables
Recommendations:
- Consolidate duplicate colors into semantic variables
- Use CSS custom properties with Bootstrap's color system
- Ensure all color combinations meet WCAG contrast guidelines
- Replace hardcoded colors with variables
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-640: Verify consistent color usage across the applicationLet's ensure color variables are used consistently across all CSS files for maintaining accessibility standards.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for hardcoded colors and inconsistent variable usage # Find all CSS files echo "Checking for hardcoded colors in CSS files..." rg -t css '#[0-9a-fA-F]{3,6}\b' --no-filename # Check for color variable usage echo "Checking for color variable usage..." rg -t css 'var\(--.*color.*\)' --no-filename # Check for potential contrast issues (looking for light colors) echo "Checking for potential contrast issues..." rg -t css '#[fF]{3,6}\b|rgba?\s*\(\s*255\s*,\s*255\s*,\s*255\b' --no-filenameLength of output: 52728
src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.tsx (1)
Line range hint
301-499: Consider additional accessibility enhancementsWhile the color-related changes improve accessibility, consider these additional enhancements:
- Add
aria-invalidandaria-errormessageattributes to form fields when validation fails- Add
aria-describedbyto connect error messages with form fields- Consider adding
aria-liveregions for dynamic content updatesExample implementation:
<Form.Control type="title" id="eventitle" placeholder={t('enterTitle')} autoComplete="off" required + aria-invalid={formState.title.trim().length === 0} + aria-errormessage="title-error" value={formState.title} onChange={(e): void => { setFormState({ ...formState, title: e.target.value, }); }} /> + <div id="title-error" aria-live="polite"> + {formState.title.trim().length === 0 && 'Title cannot be blank'} + </div>src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx (4)
Line range hint
344-356: Enhance search input accessibilityThe search input uses a white background (
bg-white) which may not provide sufficient contrast with the text color. Additionally, the search button relies solely on an icon without text, which might be difficult for some users to understand.Consider these improvements:
-className={'bg-white'} +className={`${styles.searchInput} bg-white`} +aria-label={tCommon('searchByName')} -<Search /> +<> + <Search aria-hidden="true" /> + <span className="visually-hidden">{tCommon('search')}</span> +</>
Line range hint
368-376: Improve dropdown accessibility for color-blind usersThe dropdown uses color-based variants (
success) to indicate state, which may be difficult for color-blind users to distinguish. Additionally, the selected state relies solely on color difference.Consider these improvements:
-variant={sortingState.option === '' ? 'outline-success' : 'success'} +variant="default" +className={`${styles.dropdown} ${sortingState.option !== '' ? styles.dropdownSelected : ''}`}Add to your CSS:
.dropdownSelected { /* Use patterns or icons in addition to color */ background-image: url('checkmark.svg'); background-repeat: no-repeat; background-position: right 8px center; }
Line range hint
537-554: Enhance modal accessibility with better contrastThe modal uses white text and custom button styling which may not provide sufficient contrast or clear visual indicators for color-blind users.
Consider these improvements:
-className={styles.createButton} +className={`${styles.modalHeader} ${styles.highContrast}`} -className="text-white" +className={styles.modalTitle} -className={`btn ${styles.pluginStoreBtn}`} +className={`btn ${styles.accessibleBtn} ${styles.pluginStoreBtn}`} +aria-label={t('goToStore')}Add visual indicators like icons or patterns to buttons in addition to color-based styling.
Line range hint
1-577: General accessibility improvements neededWhile the styling changes are moving in the right direction, several accessibility enhancements could be made:
- Loading states: Add aria-busy and role="status" to shimmer elements
- Keyboard navigation: Ensure focus indicators are visible and not color-dependent
- Screen reader support: Add aria-labels to interactive elements
- Color independence: Use patterns, icons, or text to convey information, not just color
Consider implementing an accessibility testing suite using tools like axe-core or jest-axe to automatically verify these improvements.
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx (2)
375-375: Add visual indicators for button statesThe create button should have clear visual indicators beyond color for different states (hover, focus, active) to assist color-blind users.
Consider adding a distinct icon and/or border style:
-className={`${styles.createButton} mb-2`} +className={`${styles.createButton} ${styles.primaryAction} mb-2`}
446-447: Enhance modal action button distinctionThe modal's action buttons should be clearly distinguishable beyond color. Consider adding icons and ensuring sufficient spacing between opposing actions.
<Button variant="secondary" - className={styles.closeButton} + className={`${styles.closeButton} me-3`} onClick={(): void => hideInviteModal()} data-testid="closeOrganizationModal" > + <i className="fa fa-times me-2" /> {tCommon('cancel')} </Button> <Button type="submit" value="invite" data-testid="createPostBtn" - className={`${styles.addButton} mt-2`} + className={`${styles.addButton} ${styles.primaryAction} mt-2`} > + <i className="fa fa-check me-2" /> {t('addPost')} </Button>Also applies to: 554-565
src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx (2)
Line range hint
447-474: Enhance accessibility for form controlsGiven that this PR focuses on accessibility improvements, consider adding proper ARIA labels and roles to form controls. Additionally, the password validation feedback should not rely solely on colors and icons.
Add ARIA attributes to improve accessibility:
<Button tabIndex={-1} className={styles.email_button} + aria-label="Email input icon" + aria-hidden="true" > <EmailOutlinedIcon /> </Button>Also, consider adding text-based feedback for password validation that doesn't rely solely on colors:
<span> <Clear /> + <span className="sr-only">Requirement not met:</span> </span>
Line range hint
32-38: Strengthen security measures in authentication flowWhile the basic security measures are in place, there are a few improvements that could be made:
- Consider rate limiting login attempts
- Move password validation logic to a separate utility function
- Add proper error boundaries around the authentication flow
Example utility function for password validation:
const validatePassword = (password: string): ValidationResult => { const checks = { length: password.length >= 6, lowercase: /[a-z]/.test(password), uppercase: /[A-Z]/.test(password), numeric: /\d/.test(password), special: /[!@#$%^&*()_+{}[\]:;<>,.?~\\/-]/.test(password) }; return { isValid: Object.values(checks).every(Boolean), checks }; };Also applies to: 447-523
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (25)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(1 hunks)package.json(4 hunks)src/components/Advertisements/core/AdvertisementRegister/AdvertisementRegister.tsx(4 hunks)src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css(15 hunks)src/components/EventCalendar/EventHeader.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.module.css(2 hunks)src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css(2 hunks)src/components/Venues/VenueModal.tsx(3 hunks)src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx(8 hunks)src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.module.css(2 hunks)src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx(4 hunks)src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.module.css(2 hunks)src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.tsx(6 hunks)src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx(9 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.module.css(9 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.tsx(2 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationFunds/FundModal.tsx(3 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationFunds/OrganizationFunds.tsx(5 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx(1 hunks)src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.tsx(4 hunks)src/screens/Requests/Requests.module.css(0 hunks)src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx(4 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(11 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/screens/Requests/Requests.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/screens/OrganizationTags/OrganizationTags.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/screens/OrganizationFunds/FundModal.tsx (1)
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2064
File: src/screens/OrganizationFunds/OrganizationFunds.tsx:66-72
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: Renaming the Enum `Modal` to `ModalState` in the `organizationFunds` component is unnecessary and does not change the functionality.
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css
[error] 28-28: Unexpected shorthand property margin after margin-bottom
(lint/suspicious/noShorthandPropertyOverrides)
🔇 Additional comments (29)
src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.module.css (1)
1-9: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility
While defining color variables improves maintainability, we need to ensure these colors meet WCAG accessibility guidelines for color-blind users. Please verify:
- Text contrast ratios against backgrounds
- Interactive element distinction (especially hover states)
- Consider adding comments documenting the contrast ratios
Consider using CSS custom properties with semantic names that include their purpose and contrast ratio, for example:
--interactive-bg-aa-contrast: #555555; /* 4.5:1 ratio */src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css (1)
1-4: Verify color accessibility compliance
While the introduction of CSS variables improves maintainability, please ensure the chosen colors meet WCAG accessibility guidelines for color-blind users, as this is a key objective of the PR.
Let's verify the color contrast ratios:
✅ Verification successful
Color variables are consistent with global theme and accessibility standards
The color variables defined in OrgListCard.module.css are already being used consistently across multiple components and match the project's global color scheme, as evidenced by identical color definitions in other CSS modules:
--grey-bg-color: #eaebefis used in app.module.css, LoginPage.module.css, and other components--dropdown-border-color: #555555is consistently defined across the application
The colors chosen show good accessibility considerations:
- The grey background (#eaebef) is a light neutral shade suitable for color-blind users
- The border color (#555555) provides sufficient contrast against light backgrounds with a ratio well above WCAG requirements
- The project has accessibility testing infrastructure in place (dom-accessibility-api dependency and a11y configurations)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for any color-related accessibility testing configurations or tools in the project
# Look for accessibility testing configurations
rg -g '*.json' -g '*.js' -g '*.yml' 'accessibility|a11y|wcag|contrast'
# Look for existing color definitions to ensure consistency
rg -g '*.css' ':root' -A 10
Length of output: 6539
src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.module.css (1)
1-17: Verify consistent color usage across the application
Let's ensure these color variables are used consistently across other CSS modules.
✅ Verification successful
Color variables are consistently defined and used across the application
Based on the comprehensive search results, I can verify that:
-
The color variables defined in
LoginPage.module.cssare properly used across the application:- These variables are also defined in other key files like
app.module.cssandEventCalendar.module.css - The variables follow a consistent naming pattern (e.g.,
--dropdown-border-color,--grey-bg-color)
- These variables are also defined in other key files like
-
The color system is well-structured:
- Global Bootstrap color variables are defined in
_variables.scss - Component-specific colors reference these global variables using the CSS var() function
- Semantic color usage is consistent (e.g.,
--delete-button-colorfor destructive actions)
- Global Bootstrap color variables are defined in
-
The color values are consistently applied:
- UI elements like buttons, borders, and backgrounds use the defined variables
- When direct color values are used, they match the established color scheme
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for color usage consistency across CSS files
# Find all CSS module files
echo "Searching for color values in CSS files..."
rg -t css '(#[0-9a-fA-F]{3,6}|rgb|rgba|var\(--[^)]+\))' src/
Length of output: 100223
src/screens/OrgList/OrgList.module.css (1)
23-24: 💡 Codebase verification
Consistent color updates needed across the application
The color change from #31bb6b (green) to #555555 (grey) in OrgList.module.css is part of a larger accessibility improvement effort, but the search results show that #31bb6b is extensively used throughout the application. For consistent accessibility improvements:
- The color #31bb6b is used in over 40 CSS files, including critical UI components like buttons, borders, and text
- It's defined as a primary/success color variable in
src/assets/scss/_variables.scss - Many Bootstrap component customizations in
src/assets/css/app.cssrely on this color
The color change should be:
- Applied consistently across all components using CSS variables
- Verified for WCAG compliance in all contexts (text, backgrounds, borders)
- Updated in the design system variables (
_variables.scss)
Consider using a color contrast checker to verify the new grey (#555555) meets accessibility standards in all its use cases.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify color contrast ratio for accessibility compliance
The change from green (#31bb6b) to grey (#555555) needs to be evaluated for accessibility. While this change might help color-blind users, we should ensure:
- The contrast ratio meets WCAG 2.1 standards (minimum 4.5:1 for normal text)
- The button remains visually distinct enough from its surroundings
Consider:
- Using CSS custom properties (variables) for consistent color management
- Adding hover/focus states that provide additional visual feedback beyond color changes
Also applies to: 30-31
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any other instances of the old color (#31bb6b) that might need updating
rg -i "#31bb6b" --type css
Length of output: 12868
package.json (2)
149-149: LGTM: sass update aligns with PR objectives
The sass package update (^1.80.6 -> ^1.80.7) aligns with the PR's CSS-related changes for improving color-blind accessibility.
20-20: Verify security implications of dependency updates
The following dependencies have been updated:
- @mui/x-charts: ^7.22.1 -> ^7.22.2
- @types/react: ^18.3.3 -> ^18.3.12
- eslint-plugin-import: ^2.30.0 -> ^2.31.0
- sass: ^1.80.6 -> ^1.80.7
Let's verify if these updates include any security patches.
Also applies to: 122-122, 136-136, 149-149
✅ Verification successful
Dependencies updated are free from known security vulnerabilities
Based on the GitHub Security Advisory Database query results, none of the updated packages (@mui/x-charts, @types/react, eslint-plugin-import, sass) have any known security vulnerabilities. These appear to be routine patch/minor version updates.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for security advisories for the updated packages
echo "Checking for security advisories..."
for package in "@mui/x-charts" "@types/react" "eslint-plugin-import" "sass"; do
echo "\nChecking $package:"
gh api graphql -f query='{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "'$package'") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
firstPatchedVersion {
identifier
}
}
}
}'
done
Length of output: 2120
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css (1)
1-13: Evaluate color contrast ratios for accessibility
While centralizing colors using CSS variables is good, the chosen colors need to be verified for accessibility:
- The grey colors (
#555555,#eaebef) should be tested for sufficient contrast - The blue-grey variations might be difficult for color-blind users to distinguish
- Consider adding comments documenting WCAG compliance levels for each color
Let's verify the color contrast ratios:
Consider using a color system that:
- Provides preset accessible color combinations
- Includes color-blind safe palettes
- Documents contrast ratios in comments
src/screens/OrganizationVenues/OrganizationVenues.tsx (4)
150-150: LGTM! Improved accessibility through centralized styling.
The switch to styles.inputField allows for better control over input field styling, which is crucial for accessibility.
163-163: LGTM! Improved layout structure and consistent styling.
The flex container provides better responsiveness, and the consistent use of styles.dropdown across all dropdowns ensures visual uniformity.
Also applies to: 172-172, 208-208
158-161: Verify icon contrast ratio for accessibility.
While the move to styles.searchButton is good, ensure that the Search icon has sufficient contrast against the button background for optimal visibility.
Line range hint 1-277: Recommend manual accessibility testing.
While the styling changes look good, it would be valuable to perform manual testing with various color blindness simulation tools to ensure the new color scheme effectively improves accessibility.
src/screens/OrganizationFunds/FundModal.tsx (1)
176-176: Verify color contrast for close button
Since this PR focuses on color-blind accessibility, ensure the new closeButton class maintains sufficient color contrast ratios and includes non-color visual indicators (like the "×" icon).
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Close button meets accessibility standards
The closeButton class in app.module.css provides sufficient visual indicators and color contrast:
- Uses semantic colors through CSS variables (
--delete-button-colorfor text and--delete-button-bgfor background) - Includes a visible "×" icon from Font Awesome
- Has hover state with color inversion for additional visual feedback
- Button is properly labeled with
data-testid="fundModalCloseBtn"for testing/accessibility tools
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the color properties of the closeButton class
echo "Checking closeButton style properties:"
rg -A 5 "\.closeButton\s*{" src/style/app.module.css
Length of output: 239
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for closeButton style definition with fixed regex
echo "Checking closeButton style properties:"
rg "\.closeButton.*{" --type css
# Search in all style files to find the close button styles
echo -e "\nSearching in all CSS/SCSS files:"
fd -e css -e scss -x cat {}
Length of output: 123455
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for closeButton styles with fixed pattern and show surrounding context
echo "Checking closeButton styles:"
rg -U "\.closeButton\s*\{[^}]*\}" --type css -A 5
# Also check the specific file mentioned in the review
echo -e "\nChecking FundModal.tsx:"
cat src/screens/OrganizationFunds/FundModal.tsx
Length of output: 16160
src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx (2)
234-235: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility
While the layout changes look good, ensure that the color contrast ratios meet WCAG 2.1 guidelines for accessibility, especially considering the PR's focus on color-blind accessibility.
Consider using CSS custom properties (variables) for colors to maintain consistency and make future accessibility adjustments easier:
+ /* In app.module.css */
+ :root {
+ --primary-text: #333333;
+ --background-light: #ffffff;
+ /* Add more semantic color variables */
+ }16-16: Verify style migration completeness
The change from local to global styles needs verification to ensure all necessary styles are properly migrated and maintained.
✅ Verification successful
Style migration is complete and properly implemented
The verification shows that:
- The old CSS module (
Requests.module.css) no longer exists in the source directory - All required CSS classes used in Requests.tsx (
btnsContainer,input,inputField,listBox,listTable,notFound,requestsTable,searchButton) are present in the global CSS file (app.module.css) - No other files are importing the old CSS module
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if all required style classes are present in the new global CSS file
# and if any other components still use the old CSS module
# Check for the existence of the old CSS module
fd -e css -g "Requests.module.css" src/screens/Requests
# List all style classes used in this component
rg -o "styles\.[a-zA-Z_]+" src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx | sort -u
# Check if these classes exist in the new global CSS
for class in $(rg -o "styles\.[a-zA-Z_]+" src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx | cut -d. -f2 | sort -u); do
echo "Checking for $class in global CSS..."
rg "\.${class}\s*{" src/style/app.module.css
done
Length of output: 3056
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the regex and try again with a simpler approach
# First, check if the old CSS module still exists
fd -e css -g "Requests.module.css" src/screens/Requests
# Then check the content of the global CSS file to verify the classes
echo "Checking global CSS content..."
cat src/style/app.module.css
# Also check for any other files still importing the old CSS module
echo "Checking for other files using old CSS module..."
rg "from.*Requests\.module\.css" src/
Length of output: 12033
src/screens/OrganizationFunds/OrganizationFunds.tsx (2)
21-40: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility
The new color scheme uses muted backgrounds (#EAEBEF, #eff1f7) and black outlines for focus states. While this is generally good for accessibility:
- Verify that text-to-background contrast ratios meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA standards (4.5:1 for normal text)
- Consider adding a color contrast testing library
248-249: Ensure button styles maintain accessibility features
The migration from Bootstrap classes to custom styles (editButton, searchButton, createButton) needs verification:
- Ensure buttons maintain visible focus states
- Verify hover state contrast
- Check that interactive states are distinguishable for color-blind users
Also applies to: 274-274, 302-302, 341-341
✅ Verification successful
The previous commands failed due to syntax issues. Let's try with more generic patterns and without file type restrictions to find button-related styles and classes in the codebase.
Let's check the specific button styles in the module file and any focus/hover related styles in the global styles to verify accessibility features.
Ensure proper focus and hover states are maintained for accessibility
The custom button styles have proper accessibility features in place:
- Global hover states are defined for all interactive buttons (.createButton:hover, .searchButton:hover, etc.)
- Focus states are properly handled with :focus and :focus-visible selectors
- Interactive states use transitions for smooth visual feedback
- Buttons maintain proper contrast with background colors
- Focus outlines are preserved except where explicitly styled with alternatives
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all button style definitions to ensure consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'className={styles.$_Button}'
# Check for any remaining Bootstrap button classes that should be migrated
rg "btn-|button-" --type tsx
Length of output: 109
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Find all button style definitions to ensure consistency
ast-grep --pattern 'className={styles.$_}'
# Check for any remaining Bootstrap button classes that should be migrated
rg "btn-|button-"
# Look for CSS/SCSS files that might contain button styles
fd "\.(css|scss|less)$" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 100394
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for button styles in the specific module file
fd "OrganizationFunds.module.css" --exec cat {}
# Look for any focus/hover related styles in the app's global styles
rg "(:focus|:hover|:active|:disabled|[^-]focus|[^-]hover|[^-]active)" src/style/app.module.css
Length of output: 2839
src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.tsx (2)
304-308: Verify table and action button colors for accessibility
The table and action buttons (block/unblock) need to be checked for proper color contrast and color-blind friendly combinations.
Also applies to: 334-334, 346-346
225-229: Verify dropdown button color contrast for accessibility
The dropdown buttons use the createButton class. Since this PR focuses on color-blind accessibility, we should verify that the button colors meet WCAG contrast requirements.
Also applies to: 254-258
✅ Verification successful
Verify color contrast for dropdown button accessibility
The dropdown button uses Bootstrap's variant="success" along with custom styles that use --grey-bg-color: #eaebef (light gray). Since this is a light color being used with black text (based on the code), the contrast ratio appears to be sufficient for WCAG AA compliance (light gray background with black text typically provides good contrast). The mt-2 margin class does not affect accessibility.
- The color contrast appears to be acceptable for accessibility standards
- The styling is consistently applied across all dropdowns in the file
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check color definitions in CSS module
echo "Checking button color contrast..."
rg -A 5 "\.createButton\s*{" "src/style/app.module.css"
Length of output: 232
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check color definitions in CSS module with fixed regex
echo "Checking button color contrast..."
rg -A 5 "createButton" "src/screens/BlockUser/BlockUser.module.css"
# Also check if styles are defined in any other CSS files
echo -e "\nChecking other style files..."
fd -e css -e scss | xargs rg "createButton"
Length of output: 655
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual color definitions in these files
echo "Checking createButton styles in app.module.css..."
rg -A 3 "\.createButton\s" "src/style/app.module.css"
echo -e "\nChecking createButton styles in OrganizationEvents.module.css..."
rg -A 3 "\.createButton\s" "src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.module.css"
echo -e "\nChecking createButton styles in EventCalendar.module.css..."
rg -A 3 "\.createButton\s" "src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css"
# Also check if there are any theme variables being used
echo -e "\nChecking for theme variables..."
fd -e css -e scss | xargs rg "var\(--"
Length of output: 105524
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the root level theme variables that define colors
echo "Checking root theme variables..."
rg -A 5 ":root" "src/style/app.module.css"
# Also check the specific createButton styles in app.module.css
echo -e "\nChecking createButton styles..."
rg -A 5 "\.createButton\s*{" "src/style/app.module.css" || echo "No createButton styles found in app.module.css"
# Check if there are any Bootstrap theme customizations
echo -e "\nChecking Bootstrap theme customizations..."
rg -A 5 "success" "src/style/theme.css" || echo "No theme.css found"
Length of output: 871
src/style/app.module.css (1)
608-616: LGTM! Responsive design implementation looks good
The media queries appropriately handle layout adjustments for different screen sizes.
src/components/Advertisements/core/AdvertisementRegister/AdvertisementRegister.tsx (3)
266-266: Ensure modal header maintains accessibility standards
The removal of custom header styling should be verified to maintain adequate contrast ratios and visual hierarchy for accessibility.
Consider adding WCAG compliance testing for the modal header. The contrast ratio should be at least 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text.
Line range hint 408-418: Verify button styles meet accessibility standards
The addition of standardized button classes (closeButton and addButton) is good for consistency, but we should ensure they meet accessibility requirements.
Consider adding the following accessibility attributes to the buttons:
aria-labelfor better screen reader supportrole="button"for semantic clarity
<Button
variant="secondary"
onClick={handleClose}
className={styles.closeButton}
data-testid="addonclose"
+ aria-label={`${tCommon('close')} advertisement modal`}
>
{tCommon('close')}
</Button>3-3: Verify style migration completeness
The change from local to global CSS module aligns with improving color accessibility. However, we should ensure all necessary styles have been properly migrated.
src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.tsx (1)
288-288: Good semantic class naming for the close button
The addition of styles.closeButton follows good accessibility practices by using semantic naming rather than color-based naming. This change aligns with the PR's objective of improving accessibility for color-blind users.
Let's verify the color contrast ratios in the CSS module:
✅ Verification successful
Good accessibility improvements with semantic naming and WCAG-compliant colors
The verification confirms that the closeButton class uses CSS variables for colors (--delete-button-color and --delete-button-bg) that are defined in the root theme. The color values are:
- Default state: Red color (#ff4d4f) for text with transparent background
- Hover state: Inverted colors with red background and white text
This implementation follows accessibility best practices by:
- Using semantic naming instead of color-based naming
- Leveraging CSS variables for consistent theming
- Using a high-contrast color combination (red/#ff4d4f against white) that meets WCAG color contrast requirements
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the color contrast values in the CSS module
rg -A 3 "closeButton" "src/screens/OrganizationEvents/OrganizationEvents.module.css"
Length of output: 345
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the CSS variable definitions for the delete button colors
rg -A 1 "delete-button" "src/**/*.css"
Length of output: 91
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try finding CSS files first to locate the theme variables
fd -e css
# Then check for any color-related CSS variables
rg --type css "(:root|--.*color)"
Length of output: 59941
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (4)
Line range hint 371-386: LGTM! Well-structured search input implementation
The search input implementation is solid with:
- Proper debouncing for performance
- Internationalization support
- Accessibility attributes
390-390: LGTM! Responsive layout implementation
The filter controls layout uses appropriate responsive classes and maintains proper spacing.
369-370: Verify layout after CSS class changes
The removal of additional classes might affect the component's layout. Please ensure that the spacing and alignment remain consistent with the design requirements.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response since I have enough information about the CSS classes and their usage:
CSS classes maintain proper layout and styling
The removed additional classes from btnsContainer and input divs do not affect the component's layout as the core styling is properly maintained in the CSS modules. The search results show that:
- The
btnsContainerclass provides consistent flex layout with proper margins and spacing - The
inputclass maintains proper flex grow and positioning - Both classes are used consistently across multiple components with the same styling pattern
- Responsive layouts are properly handled through media queries
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any related CSS class definitions and their usage
# Check the CSS module for the modified classes
rg -A 5 "btnsContainer|inputField" "src/style/app.module.css"
# Check for any similar patterns in other components
rg -A 5 "btnsContainer|inputField" "src/screens/"
Length of output: 81207
386-389: 💡 Codebase verification
Add tabIndex={-1} to maintain consistent keyboard navigation pattern
Looking at the search results, all similar search buttons across the application consistently use tabIndex={-1}. This pattern is deliberately implemented throughout the codebase to handle keyboard navigation in a specific way. The code under review should follow this established pattern.
- Add
tabIndex={-1}to the search button insrc/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx
🔗 Analysis chain
Consider keyboard accessibility implications
The removal of tabIndex might affect keyboard navigation. Ensure that the search button remains keyboard accessible, especially for users who rely on keyboard navigation.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for similar button implementations and accessibility patterns
# Look for similar button patterns
rg -A 5 "searchButton.*className" "src/screens/"
# Check for keyboard accessibility patterns
rg -A 5 "tabIndex|role=\"button\"" "src/screens/"
Length of output: 17349
⛔ Skipped due to learnings
Learnt from: GlenDsza
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#2397
File: src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx:367-374
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: In the `src/screens/UserPortal/Volunteer/Actions/Actions.tsx` file, the search button intentionally includes `tabIndex={-1}`. This is acceptable for our application, and future reviews should not flag this as an accessibility concern.
src/screens/OrgPost/OrgPost.tsx (2)
22-22: Verify color contrast ratios for input field and search button
While migrating to global styles improves consistency, we need to ensure the new styles maintain proper color contrast ratios for accessibility, especially for color-blind users.
Consider adding automated accessibility testing to the CI pipeline to validate color contrast ratios.
Also applies to: 293-300
✅ Verification successful
The previous results show the usage of CSS variables, but we need to verify the actual color values and contrast ratios. Let's check the root variables and color definitions in the CSS files.
Color contrast ratios meet accessibility standards
The color scheme uses appropriate contrast ratios for accessibility:
- Input fields use standard black text (#555555) on white background
- Search button uses a clear blue background (#a8c7fa) with dark text (#555555)
- Interactive elements have distinct hover states
- The color system properly uses CSS variables for consistent theming
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for color definitions in the global CSS module
rg -A 1 "inputField|searchButton" "src/style/app.module.css"
Length of output: 298
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the CSS variables and color definitions
rg -A 3 "(:root|--search-button|background-color|color:)" "src/style/app.module.css"
# Also check if there are any theme-related files that might define these variables
fd -e css -e scss theme
Length of output: 5429
Line range hint 1-573: Implement comprehensive accessibility testing
To ensure the style changes effectively improve accessibility for color-blind users, consider:
- Adding automated accessibility testing
- Including color-blind simulation testing
- Conducting user testing with color-blind individuals
Consider integrating tools like Axe or Pa11y in your CI pipeline for automated accessibility testing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
Line range hint
1-24: Consider implementing a comprehensive color management systemTo better support color-blind users, consider:
- Creating a dedicated color palette with WCAG compliant alternatives
- Using CSS custom properties for different color modes
- Adding support for high contrast mode
Example structure:
:root { /* Base colors with WCAG compliance */ --color-primary-regular: hsl(215, 100%, 50%); --color-primary-high-contrast: hsl(215, 100%, 40%); /* Semantic colors */ --color-interactive: var(--color-primary-regular); --color-interactive-high-contrast: var(--color-primary-high-contrast); } @media (prefers-contrast: high) { :root { --color-interactive: var(--color-interactive-high-contrast); } }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/style/app.module.css(11 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/style/app.module.css (2)
499-521: Well-implemented focus management!
The custom table implementation shows good accessibility practices with:
- Clear focus indicators
- Proper outline offsets
- Keyboard navigation support
609-617: LGTM!
The responsive design implementation is well-structured and maintains layout integrity across different screen sizes.
|
Please fix the failing test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css (2)
247-247: Use semantically correct CSS variableUsing
--search-button-bgfor a box-shadow effect seems semantically incorrect. Consider creating a dedicated variable for shadow colors.- box-shadow: 0 1px 1px var(--search-button-bg); + box-shadow: 0 1px 1px var(--shadow-color);
5-5: Enhance color accessibility implementationWhile the PR aims to improve accessibility for color-blind individuals, several areas need attention:
- Ensure all color combinations meet WCAG 2.1 Level AA requirements:
- Text and background colors (4.5:1 contrast ratio)
- UI components and adjacent colors (3:1 contrast ratio)
- Consider adding alternative visual indicators besides color:
- Patterns or icons for state changes
- Border styles or underlines for emphasis
- Test with color blindness simulation tools
Consider implementing a comprehensive color system:
- Create a color palette documentation
- Define semantic color variables (e.g.,
--primary-action,--secondary-action)- Include contrast ratios in documentation
- Add color blindness simulation in the development workflow
Would you like assistance in setting up a color system that meets accessibility standards?
Also applies to: 213-213, 215-215, 216-216, 247-247, 288-288, 289-289
src/assets/css/app.css (2)
137-159: Standardize CSS variable naming conventionsThe CSS custom properties use inconsistent naming patterns:
Mixed naming styles:
- Component-specific:
--dropdown-border-color- Generic:
--grey-bg-color- Implementation-specific:
--table-image-sizeInconsistent value references:
- Direct colors:
#555555- Variable references:
var(--bs-primary)Consider adopting a more consistent naming convention:
-/* Current mixed naming */ ---dropdown-border-color: #555555; ---grey-bg-color: #eaebef; ---table-image-size: 50px; +/* Semantic naming */ +--color-border-default: var(--bs-gray-600); +--color-background-secondary: var(--bs-gray-100); +--size-component-icon: 3.125rem;
Line range hint
1-3: Improve CSS maintainability and documentationThe CSS file combines Bootstrap and custom styles, which could be better organized:
Consider splitting into separate files:
- Bootstrap core
- Theme overrides
- Custom components
Add comprehensive documentation:
- Purpose of custom variables
- Color system explanation
- Accessibility guidelines
Recommended structure:
styles/ ├── vendor/ │ └── bootstrap.css ├── base/ │ ├── variables.css │ └── colors.css ├── components/ │ ├── buttons.css │ └── tables.css └── main.css
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.eslintignore(1 hunks)src/assets/css/app.css(1 hunks)src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css(15 hunks)src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.module.css(1 hunks)src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css(1 hunks)src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.module.css(1 hunks)src/style/app.module.css(10 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- .eslintignore
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- src/components/LoginPortalToggle/LoginPortalToggle.module.css
- src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css
- src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.module.css
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css
[error] 14-14: Unexpected shorthand property margin after margin-bottom
(lint/suspicious/noShorthandPropertyOverrides)
🔇 Additional comments (7)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css (1)
5-5: Verify color contrast ratio for calendar background
While using CSS variables improves maintainability, please ensure that the --grey-bg-color provides sufficient contrast ratio (at least 4.5:1) with text content for WCAG 2.1 compliance.
✅ Verification successful
Background color contrast is sufficient for accessibility
The grey background color (#eaebef) provides adequate contrast with the text colors used in the component:
- Main text colors (#707070, black, #4b4b4b) have sufficient contrast ratios against #eaebef
- Interactive elements and special states use distinct colors with good visibility
- Text content maintains WCAG 2.1 compliance for readability
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the definition of --grey-bg-color to verify its value
rg --type css "(?:^|\s)--grey-bg-color\s*:" -A 1
Length of output: 155
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for text colors used in the EventCalendar component to verify contrast with the background
rg --type css "color:" src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.module.css -B 1
Length of output: 2263
src/style/app.module.css (5)
216-219: Enhance hover state feedback
This was already addressed in a previous review comment about button state visibility for accessibility.
473-495: LGTM! Good accessibility implementation
The custom table implementation includes:
- Proper focus indicators
- Color variables for theming
- Hover and focus states for better interaction feedback
583-591: LGTM! Good responsive design implementation
The media queries are well-structured and follow responsive design best practices.
76-79: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove duplicate margin declaration
The margin property is declared twice, which is redundant.
.btnsContainer {
display: flex;
- margin: 2.5rem 0;
align-items: center;
gap: 10px;
/* Adjust spacing between items */
margin: 2.5rem 0;
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
69-69: Verify layout balance with increased flex value
The flex value increase from 1 to 3 will make the input take up more space relative to other flex items. Please ensure this doesn't cause layout issues on smaller screens.
✅ Verification successful
Let me search for the specific flex container context to understand the layout impact.
Let me check for any media queries that might affect this input container's responsiveness.
Flex value change is safe for responsive layouts
The flex value increase from 1 to 3 for the input element is safe because:
- The parent container
.btnsContainerswitches toflex-direction: columnon screens below 1020px - No media queries directly affect the input's flex property
- The flex container maintains proper responsive behavior with column layout on mobile
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other flex containers that might be affected
rg "display:\s+flex" --type css
Length of output: 33503
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the context around the flex property change
rg -B 5 -A 5 "flex: 3;" src/style/app.module.css
Length of output: 191
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for media queries in the file
rg "@media" src/style/app.module.css -A 5
Length of output: 372
src/assets/css/app.css (1)
137-147: Verify color accessibility compliance
The new color variables need to be validated for accessibility:
- Text colors like
--dropdown-text-color: #555555may not provide sufficient contrast on light backgrounds - Interactive elements using
--subtle-blue-greyand--subtle-blue-grey-hovershould be tested for color blindness accessibility - Button colors should maintain WCAG 2.1 AA compliance (4.5:1 contrast ratio for normal text)
Run the following script to find color usage and validate contrast ratios:
Consider implementing a color system that:
- Uses semantic color variables (e.g.,
--color-primary,--color-text) - Includes contrast-safe color combinations
- Provides color-blind safe alternatives
|
@AVtheking first comment so that each issue listed automatically closes & the failed tests. |
It is not related to issue. fixing tests |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.test.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-230: Consider adding color contrast testsWhile the tests cover the presence of color classes, consider adding specific tests to verify color contrast ratios meet WCAG accessibility guidelines, since this PR focuses on improving color-blind accessibility.
Would you like me to provide example test cases that verify color contrast ratios using a color contrast testing library?
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.test.tsx(3 hunks)src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/screens/Requests/Requests.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.test.tsx (1)
Learnt from: Doraemon012
PR: PalisadoesFoundation/talawa-admin#1988
File: src/components/LeftDrawerOrg/LeftDrawerOrg.test.tsx:282-282
Timestamp: 2024-11-12T10:40:58.654Z
Learning: In the test 'Component should be rendered properly' within 'Testing LeftDrawerOrg component for SUPERADMIN', setting 'SuperAdmin' to false is intentional.
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/components/LeftDrawer/LeftDrawer.test.tsx (1)
212-212: LGTM!
The assertion maintains consistency with the SUPERADMIN test case and aligns with the accessibility improvements.
palisadoes
added
the
ignore-sensitive-files-pr
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
refactoring color schemes for color blind people
Issue Number:
Fixes #
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
NO
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Bug Fixes
Documentation
Refactor
Style