-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39
WP1.2 Coordination Meeting April 21, 2020
Meeting Report WP1.2 ‘Modelica library for MPC’
Subject: WP1.2
Date: 21-04-2020
Location: Skype for Business
Minutes taken by: Lieve Helsen (KU Leuven)
Company/Organisation - Participant
KU Leuven - Lieve Helsen (WP Leader)
KU Leuven - Iago Cupeiro
KU Leuven - Javier Arroyo
LBNL - David Blum
LBNL - Michael Wetter
SINTEF - Harald Taxt Walnum
PNNL - Sen Huang
SDU - Toa yang
SDU - Konstantin
Oak Ridge national Lab – ORNL (US) - Yeonjin Bae
Approved
4 models selected to start MPC testing
In pull request (Dave).
Dave remarks that he has been cleaning up unit tests and is providing a solution to specify the dependency libraries of each test case. Additionally there is development on starting simulations with a warm up period at time different from zero. To be reviewed by Javier.
In pull request (Filip).
Unit testing: similar status as BESTEST Air.
In pull request, update needed for zone identifiers (Javier).
Managed to compile the model with JModelica, still some issues in BOPTEST (action Iago/Javier). Check with Sen. Simulation time in FMU could be much longer than in Dymola. Changing solver might help.
Dave gave feedback and this is processed by Tao.
Iago gave feedback, occupancy profile is missing. To be processed by Sen.
Yeonjin started with the building envelope model for the 10 zones office with VAV system. Konstantin volunteers as a Reviewer. Dave sends the checklist.
Emulators overview:
Choice between TMYx (1946-2018) and TMY3 (1973-2005) weather files. We have a data reader for TMY3 in IBPSA. Both will be compared in the representative days/weeks selection (action PNNL). Sen will give an update next meeting.
Unit test for the functionality of the zone name designation to the measurement read block has already been merged with the BOPTEST master (Dave/Javier).
He sent a paper to Dave on the generation of new weather files based on historical data, to be used for grey and black box model identification (training data that differ from test data). No further progress.
Good participation (13 attendees), Dave presented the test case construction and emulators, feedback was positive: emulators cover a wide range. Comments:
2. Push towards the latest efforst on standardization of data (I/O) tags ... the process of discovering data points easier, like Project Haystack, Brick Schema, that are initiatives from the ASHRAE Standard 223P. Could BOPTEST interface with these standardization efforts?
3. Important to include documentation, e.g. control sequences included in emulators, incl. HVAC schematics and diagrams.
No update.
Broaden the user space (e.g. to Machine Learning people). How to reach these people? Jan: make a first suggestion. Cfr OpenAIGym, no update.