-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
CH7 Publishing 3D
Gabriel Bodard edited this page Jun 29, 2021
·
14 revisions
Thursday Mar 4, 16:00 UK = 17:00 CET
Convenors: Tom Flynn (SketchFab), Dinusha Mendis (Bournemouth University), Alicia Walsh (Recollection Heritage)
YouTube link: https://youtu.be/wJivJmiOuME
- Alicia Walsh: we will begin with a brief introduction for options for distributing 3D models, and a summary of what 3D printing involves and can be useful for.
- Tom Flynn: As 3D capture and content production become simpler and more widely adopted, a natural consequence is that producers of said content seek to publish that content both for viewing the 3D data and making the 3D data available for download. Numerous platforms now exist for publishing interactive 3D models online, each taking different approaches meeting the needs of 3D content publishers with regards to accepted 3D file formats, display options, user agreements and content licensing. This section of the session will give a broad overview of online publishing platforms for 3D content and a more in depth look at how sketchfab.com has approached these topics.
- Dinusha Mendis: 3D Printing, 3D Scanning and IP Law: Ownership, Authorship and Infringement. Drawing on the results of a project completed for the European Commission, the talk will consider the IP implications arising from 3D printing and 3D scanning, with particular focus on copyright and cultural organisations. In doing so, the presentation will give an insight into the IP implications surrounding the 3D printing and scanning process, from the perspective of designing a CAD file to sharing, printing and distributing it.
- Giorgio Verdiani. 2015. "Bringing Impossible Places to the Public: Three Ideas for Rupestrian Churches in Goreme, Kapadokya Utilizing a Digital Survey, 3D Printing, and Augmented Reality." Open Archaeology 1.1. Available: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/opar-2015-0007/pdf
- Dinusha Mendis, Davide Secchi & Phil Reeves. 2015. A Legal and Empirical Study into the Intellectual Property Implications of 3D Printing: Executive Summary. Project Report. London: Intellectual Property Office. Available: http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/21874/
- Diana Burton, Zach Challies & Bernard Guy (2019). "Creative expression through tangible narrative: How 3D printing may complement our pedagogical investigation of heritage." IEEE: Digital Heritage International Congress 2018. Available: https://doi.org/10.1109/DigitalHeritage.2018.8810121 (Paywalled)
- Mona Hess & Stuart Robson, 2013. “Re-engineering Watt: a case study and best practice recommendations for 3D colour laser scans and 3D printing in museum artefact documentation.” Archetype Publications. Available: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1411525/1/23-Lacona-IX-Hess.pdf
- Hannah Scates Kettler. 2021. “Linked Open Data for 3D Models and Environments.” in Linked Open Data for the Ancient Mediterranean: Structures, Practices, Prospects (edd. Bond, Dilley, Horne). ISAW Papers 20. Available: http://dlib.nyu.edu/awdl/isaw/isaw-papers/20-5/
- Mendis D., Nordemann J., et al. 2020. Intellectual Property Implications of the Development of Industrial 3D Printing. European Commission. Available: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/e193a586-7f8c-11ea-aea8-01aa75ed71a1
- Mendis D., Santos-Rutschman A. and Ballardini R. 2020. “3D Printing: How an Emerging Technology May Help Fight a Pandemic.” IPRInfo. Available: https://iprinfo.fi/artikkeli/3d-printing-how-an-emerging-technology-may-help-fight-a-pandemic/
- Mendis D., Santos-Rutschman A. 2020. “3D Printing of Body Parts is coming fast - but regulations are not ready.” The Conversation. Available: https://theconversation.com/3d-printing-of-body-parts-is-coming-fast-but-regulations-are-not-ready-128691
- Mendis D., Lemley M., Rimmer M., 3D Printing and Beyond: Intellectual Property and Regulation (Edward Elgar, 2019)
- Mendis D. 2018. “In Pursuit of Clarity: The Conundrum of CAD and Copyright.” Seeking Direction Through Case Law. 40(11) European Intellectual Property Review, 694-705.
- Mendis D., and Secchi D. 2015. A Legal and Empirical Study of 3D Printing Online Platforms and an Analysis of User Behaviour. London: Intellectual Property Office. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/549045/Study-I.pdf
- Mendis D., Secchi D and Reeves P. 2015. A Legal and Empirical Study into the Intellectual Property Implications of 3D Printing. London: Intellectual Property Office. Available: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/549045/Study-I.pdf
- David P. Smith. 2016. "Active learning in the lecture theatre using 3D printed objects." F1000Research 2016, 5:61. Available: https://dx.doi.org/10.12688%2Ff1000research.7632.2
- GLAM 3D – best practices for 3D Open Access programs at GLAM institutions
- Sketchfab Help Center
- Europeana 3D Task Force & Report
- Cultural Heritage 3D in the wider 3D Landscape (Thomas Flynn)
- Sketchfab Cultural Heritage User Survey 2019 Results (Thomas Flynn)
- Institutional Barriers to Open Access (Thomas Flynn)
- Create a free account on Sketchfab and look at the uploading, editing, and sharing options at the Sketchfab Help Center.
- Either: (a) Take a model that you have prepared earlier (e.g. from the photogrammetry session at the beginning of term) and upload it to your account space. (b) If you have not already created your own 3D model, find an existing model on Sketchfab that is CC-BY or public domain, and downloadable. You may find these lists of all public domain (CC0) cultural heritage models or all downloadable cultural heritage models useful.
- Note: Files must be max. 50Mb in order to upload them on your free account.
- After you have uploaded your model: add at least 2 annotations, and record your reasoning for your licensing choice, whether you made it downloadable or not, and which editing tools you used.
- How else can you make your uploaded model useful/accessible to other users? What would you have liked to be able to do that Sketchfab (or the free account) did not let you do? What ethical, legal, technical and practical issues did you consider?
(If you have any technical problems with this exercise, you may ask for help in this forum thread)