fixes: the search button is misplaced #2430
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request enhance the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2430 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 98.26% 98.26%
========================================
Files 297 297
Lines 8639 8646 +7
Branches 2518 2517 -1
========================================
+ Hits 8489 8496 +7
Misses 139 139
Partials 11 11 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (2)
91-92: Consider using a constant for breakpoint and handling SSRThe breakpoint value (768) should be defined as a constant for better maintainability. Also, consider handling SSR scenarios to avoid hydration mismatches.
+const MOBILE_BREAKPOINT = 768; +const [isSmallScreen, setIsSmallScreen] = useState(() => { + if (typeof window === 'undefined') return false; + return window.innerWidth <= MOBILE_BREAKPOINT; +}); -const [isSmallScreen, setIsSmallScreen] = useState(window.innerWidth <= 768);
113-119: Optimize resize handler performanceThe resize handler should be memoized and debounced to prevent unnecessary re-renders and improve performance.
+const handleResize = useCallback( + debounce((): void => { + setIsSmallScreen(window.innerWidth <= MOBILE_BREAKPOINT); + }, 250), + [] +); useEffect((): (() => void) => { - const handleResize = (): void => setIsSmallScreen(window.innerWidth <= 768); window.addEventListener('resize', handleResize); return (): void => window.removeEventListener('resize', handleResize); }, [handleResize]);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx(4 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/screens/OrganizationActionItems/OrganizationActionItems.tsx (1)
Line range hint 91-422: Overall implementation feedback
While the changes successfully address the search button positioning issue, there are several opportunities for improvement:
- Use CSS media queries instead of JavaScript for responsive design
- Handle SSR scenarios properly
- Optimize resize event handling
- Follow CSS best practices
The current implementation works but could be more robust and maintainable with the suggested improvements.
| className="position-absolute z-10 d-flex justify-content-center align-items-center" | ||
| style={{ | ||
| right: isSmallScreen ? '0px' : '0px', | ||
| bottom: isSmallScreen ? '10px' : '50px', | ||
| }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Move styles to CSS module and use media queries
Instead of using inline styles and JavaScript-based responsive design, consider using CSS modules with media queries for better maintainability and performance.
- Add these classes to your CSS module:
.searchButton {
position: absolute;
z-index: 10;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
right: 0;
bottom: 50px;
}
@media (max-width: 768px) {
.searchButton {
bottom: 10px;
}
}- Apply the changes:
-className="position-absolute z-10 d-flex justify-content-center align-items-center"
-style={{
- right: isSmallScreen ? '0px' : '0px',
- bottom: isSmallScreen ? '10px' : '50px',
-}}
+className={styles.searchButton}This approach:
- Eliminates the need for JavaScript-based responsive design
- Improves performance by removing inline styles
- Makes the styling more maintainable
- Follows CSS best practices
There was a problem hiding this comment.
add code rabbit suggestions in code
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@duplixx, to apply the suggested changes:
-
Add the CSS styles to your CSS module (e.g.,
OrganizationActionItems.module.css):.searchButton { position: absolute; z-index: 10; display: flex; justify-content: center; align-items: center; right: 0; bottom: 50px; } @media (max-width: 768px) { .searchButton { bottom: 10px; } }
-
Update the
Buttoncomponent inOrganizationActionItems.tsx:<Button tabIndex={-1} className={styles.searchButton} data-testid="searchBtn" > <Search /> </Button>
-
Remove the
isSmallScreenstate and the associateduseEffecthook, since they're no longer needed with the CSS media queries handling the responsiveness.
This refactoring will:
- Eliminate the need for JavaScript-based responsive design.
- Improve performance by removing inline styles.
- Enhance maintainability by keeping styling in CSS modules.
- Follow CSS best practices.
|
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Bugfix: Refactor (CSS change for better alignment) of search button
Issue Number:
#2429
Fixes #
Did you add tests for your changes?
Not required it was a basic css change
Snapshots/Videos:
Before:-
After:-
Screencast from 2024-11-12 20-40-16.webm
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not required
Summary
The search bar was misplaced before for both mobile devices and large screens, but now it's perfectly aligned. This fixes the issue of misalignment across different screen sizes.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
N/A
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
YES
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes