Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactored CSS files in src/screens/Users #2599

Conversation

antriksh-9
Copy link

@antriksh-9 antriksh-9 commented Dec 4, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
refactored CSS files in src/screens/Users

Issue Number:

Fixes #2528

Did you add tests for your changes?

No

Snapshots/Videos:

After changes:

Screenshot 2024-12-04 203352

Tests:

Screenshot 2024-12-04 204005

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not Relevant

Summary
The goal is to convert the CSS file in this subdirectory and all the components related to this screen to use this new design pattern.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?

Other information

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Introduced new CSS classes for improved layout and styling options, including .listBox and .notFound.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Updated styles to enhance responsiveness and maintainability across different screen sizes.
  • Refactor

    • Removed outdated CSS classes to simplify the styling structure.
    • Updated import paths for styles in the Users component to ensure consistency.
  • Style

    • Enhanced hover and focus states for buttons and dropdown items for a better user experience.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request involves the removal of the .node-version file, which specified the Node.js version, and the deletion of the Users.module.css file that contained styles for a user interface component. The Users.tsx file has been updated to import styles from a new global CSS file instead of the deleted module CSS file. Additionally, the app.module.css file has been modified to include new styles and restructure existing ones to accommodate the changes.

Changes

File Change Summary
.node-version File removed.
src/screens/Users/Users.module.css File removed.
src/screens/Users/Users.tsx Updated import statement for styles to ../../style/app.module.css.
src/style/app.module.css Added new styles, restructured existing classes, and expanded media queries for responsiveness.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Merge CSS files from src/screens/Users into src/style/app.module.css and delete old files. (#[2528])
Ensure remaining relevant files reference the global CSS file. (#[2528])

Possibly related issues

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • varshith257

"In the code where the rabbits play,
Styles were merged in a grand ballet.
Old files gone, a fresh start anew,
A global style, for me and you!
Hopping through changes, oh what a sight,
UI so bright, it feels just right! 🐇✨"


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 4, 2024

Our Pull Request Approval Process

Thanks for contributing!

Testing Your Code

Remember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:

  1. We don't merge PRs with poor code quality.
    1. Follow coding best practices such that CodeRabbit.ai approves your PR.
  2. We don't merge PRs with failed tests.
    1. When tests fail, click on the Details link to learn more.
    2. Write sufficient tests for your changes (CodeCov Patch Test). Your testing level must be better than the target threshold of the repository
    3. Tests may fail if you edit sensitive files. Ask to add the ignore-sensitive-files-pr label if the edits are necessary.
  3. We cannot merge PRs with conflicting files. These must be fixed.

Our policies make our code better.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (3)

75-75: Consider using CSS custom properties for better maintainability

The hardcoded values in the .btnsContainer and its child elements could be moved to CSS custom properties for better maintainability and consistency.

Consider this improvement:

 .btnsContainer {
   display: flex;
-  margin: 2.5rem 0 2.5rem 0;
+  margin: var(--btns-container-margin, 2.5rem 0);
 }

 .btnsContainer .inputContainer {
   flex: 1;
   position: relative;
 }

 .btnsContainer .input {
-  width: 70%;
+  width: var(--input-width, 70%);
   position: relative;
 }

 .btnsContainer .inputContainer button {
-  width: 52px;
+  width: var(--button-width, 52px);
 }

Also applies to: 89-100


Line range hint 217-267: Remove duplicate styles and use CSS custom properties

There are duplicate button styles in the mobile breakpoint (lines 251-254 and 264-267). Also, consider using CSS custom properties for breakpoints and spacing values.

Consider these improvements:

  1. Remove duplicate styles:
 @media (max-width: 520px) {
   .btnsContainer {
     margin-bottom: 0;
   }

   .btnsContainer .btnsBlock {
     display: block;
     margin-top: 1rem;
     margin-right: 0;
   }

   .btnsContainer .btnsBlock button {
     margin-bottom: 1rem;
     margin-right: 0;
     width: 100%;
   }

   .btnsContainer .btnsBlock div {
     flex: 1;
   }

   .btnsContainer .btnsBlock div[title='Sort organizations'] {
     margin-right: 0.5rem;
   }

-  .btnsContainer .btnsBlock button {
-    margin-bottom: 1rem;
-    margin-right: 0;
-    width: 100%;
-  }
 }
  1. Add CSS custom properties at the top of the file:
:root {
  --breakpoint-desktop: 1020px;
  --breakpoint-mobile: 520px;
  --spacing-xs: 0.5rem;
  --spacing-sm: 1rem;
  --spacing-md: 1.5rem;
}

Color contrast issues found in several UI elements

The verification reveals several potential WCAG 2.1 color contrast issues:

  • .closeButton uses var(--delete-button-color) on var(--delete-button-bg) background
  • .dropdown uses var(--dropdown-text-color) on white background
  • .dropdownItem uses var(--dropdown-text-color) on white background
  • .editButton uses #555555 on var(--search-button-bg) background
  • .subtleBlueGrey uses var(--subtle-blue-grey) and var(--subtle-blue-grey-hover) states

Key issues:

  • Direct color values like #555555, #707070 are used without ensuring sufficient contrast
  • CSS variables are used extensively but their contrast ratios cannot be verified without the actual color values
  • Several interactive elements (buttons, dropdowns) lack clear focus indicators when removing outline

Recommendations:

  • Maintain a minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text
  • Add visible focus indicators when removing outlines
  • Document color variables with their WCAG compliance levels
  • Use tools like WebAIM's contrast checker during development
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-267: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibility

While the CSS consolidation is well-implemented, we should ensure all color variables meet WCAG 2.1 guidelines for color contrast to fulfill the PR's accessibility objectives.

Run this script to check color contrast ratios:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Extract and analyze color variables for contrast ratios

# Find all color-related CSS custom properties
rg --no-filename "(?:color|background-color):\s*var\(--[^)]+\)" -o

# Find all direct color values
rg --no-filename "(?:color|background-color):\s*#[0-9a-fA-F]{3,6}" -o

Length of output: 31375

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c2630ae and 4f073ff.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • .node-version (0 hunks)
  • src/screens/Users/Users.module.css (0 hunks)
  • src/screens/Users/Users.tsx (1 hunks)
  • src/style/app.module.css (4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
  • .node-version
  • src/screens/Users/Users.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • src/screens/Users/Users.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)

107-117: LGTM! Clean and maintainable component styles

The new .listBox and .notFound classes follow good CSS practices with clear, single-responsibility styles.

Comment on lines +103 to +104
.btnsContainer input {
outline: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400);
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Enhance input outline contrast for better accessibility

Given the PR's objective to improve accessibility for color-blind users, consider using a higher contrast outline color and ensuring it meets WCAG 2.1 guidelines for color contrast.

Consider this improvement:

 .btnsContainer input {
-  outline: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400);
+  outline: 2px solid var(--input-outline-color, #666666);
+  /* Add focus state for better accessibility */
+  transition: outline-color 0.2s ease-in-out;
 }
+
+.btnsContainer input:focus {
+  outline-color: var(--input-focus-outline-color, #2563eb);
+}
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
.btnsContainer input {
outline: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400);
.btnsContainer input {
outline: 2px solid var(--input-outline-color, #666666);
/* Add focus state for better accessibility */
transition: outline-color 0.2s ease-in-out;
}
.btnsContainer input:focus {
outline-color: var(--input-focus-outline-color, #2563eb);
}

@antriksh-9 antriksh-9 closed this Dec 4, 2024
@antriksh-9 antriksh-9 deleted the users-refractor branch December 4, 2024 16:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant