-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 756
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
refactored CSS files in src/screens/Users #2599
refactored CSS files in src/screens/Users #2599
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request involves the removal of the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/style/app.module.css (3)
75-75
: Consider using CSS custom properties for better maintainabilityThe hardcoded values in the
.btnsContainer
and its child elements could be moved to CSS custom properties for better maintainability and consistency.Consider this improvement:
.btnsContainer { display: flex; - margin: 2.5rem 0 2.5rem 0; + margin: var(--btns-container-margin, 2.5rem 0); } .btnsContainer .inputContainer { flex: 1; position: relative; } .btnsContainer .input { - width: 70%; + width: var(--input-width, 70%); position: relative; } .btnsContainer .inputContainer button { - width: 52px; + width: var(--button-width, 52px); }Also applies to: 89-100
Line range hint
217-267
: Remove duplicate styles and use CSS custom propertiesThere are duplicate button styles in the mobile breakpoint (lines 251-254 and 264-267). Also, consider using CSS custom properties for breakpoints and spacing values.
Consider these improvements:
- Remove duplicate styles:
@media (max-width: 520px) { .btnsContainer { margin-bottom: 0; } .btnsContainer .btnsBlock { display: block; margin-top: 1rem; margin-right: 0; } .btnsContainer .btnsBlock button { margin-bottom: 1rem; margin-right: 0; width: 100%; } .btnsContainer .btnsBlock div { flex: 1; } .btnsContainer .btnsBlock div[title='Sort organizations'] { margin-right: 0.5rem; } - .btnsContainer .btnsBlock button { - margin-bottom: 1rem; - margin-right: 0; - width: 100%; - } }
- Add CSS custom properties at the top of the file:
:root { --breakpoint-desktop: 1020px; --breakpoint-mobile: 520px; --spacing-xs: 0.5rem; --spacing-sm: 1rem; --spacing-md: 1.5rem; }
Color contrast issues found in several UI elements
The verification reveals several potential WCAG 2.1 color contrast issues:
.closeButton
usesvar(--delete-button-color)
onvar(--delete-button-bg)
background.dropdown
usesvar(--dropdown-text-color)
on white background.dropdownItem
usesvar(--dropdown-text-color)
on white background.editButton
uses#555555
onvar(--search-button-bg)
background.subtleBlueGrey
usesvar(--subtle-blue-grey)
andvar(--subtle-blue-grey-hover)
statesKey issues:
- Direct color values like
#555555
,#707070
are used without ensuring sufficient contrast- CSS variables are used extensively but their contrast ratios cannot be verified without the actual color values
- Several interactive elements (buttons, dropdowns) lack clear focus indicators when removing outline
Recommendations:
- Maintain a minimum contrast ratio of 4.5:1 for normal text and 3:1 for large text
- Add visible focus indicators when removing outlines
- Document color variables with their WCAG compliance levels
- Use tools like WebAIM's contrast checker during development
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-267
: Verify color contrast ratios for accessibilityWhile the CSS consolidation is well-implemented, we should ensure all color variables meet WCAG 2.1 guidelines for color contrast to fulfill the PR's accessibility objectives.
Run this script to check color contrast ratios:
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Extract and analyze color variables for contrast ratios # Find all color-related CSS custom properties rg --no-filename "(?:color|background-color):\s*var\(--[^)]+\)" -o # Find all direct color values rg --no-filename "(?:color|background-color):\s*#[0-9a-fA-F]{3,6}" -oLength of output: 31375
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
.node-version
(0 hunks)src/screens/Users/Users.module.css
(0 hunks)src/screens/Users/Users.tsx
(1 hunks)src/style/app.module.css
(4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (2)
- .node-version
- src/screens/Users/Users.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/screens/Users/Users.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/style/app.module.css (1)
107-117
: LGTM! Clean and maintainable component styles
The new .listBox
and .notFound
classes follow good CSS practices with clear, single-responsibility styles.
.btnsContainer input { | ||
outline: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Enhance input outline contrast for better accessibility
Given the PR's objective to improve accessibility for color-blind users, consider using a higher contrast outline color and ensuring it meets WCAG 2.1 guidelines for color contrast.
Consider this improvement:
.btnsContainer input {
- outline: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400);
+ outline: 2px solid var(--input-outline-color, #666666);
+ /* Add focus state for better accessibility */
+ transition: outline-color 0.2s ease-in-out;
}
+
+.btnsContainer input:focus {
+ outline-color: var(--input-focus-outline-color, #2563eb);
+}
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
.btnsContainer input { | |
outline: 1px solid var(--bs-gray-400); | |
.btnsContainer input { | |
outline: 2px solid var(--input-outline-color, #666666); | |
/* Add focus state for better accessibility */ | |
transition: outline-color 0.2s ease-in-out; | |
} | |
.btnsContainer input:focus { | |
outline-color: var(--input-focus-outline-color, #2563eb); | |
} |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
refactored CSS files in src/screens/Users
Issue Number:
Fixes #2528
Did you add tests for your changes?
No
Snapshots/Videos:
After changes:
Tests:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not Relevant
Summary
The goal is to convert the CSS file in this subdirectory and all the components related to this screen to use this new design pattern.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
.listBox
and.notFound
.Bug Fixes
Refactor
Style