-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: clade mismatch against nearest node #1526
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
After the query node placement is adjusted during the [greedy tree building](https://docs.nextstrain.org/projects/nextclade/en/stable/user/algorithm/03-phylogenetic-placement.html#tree-building), sometimes the branch needs to be split and a new internal node inserted. Currently we copy the clade of this internal node from the attachment target node. However, this is not always correct and can lead to mismatch between clade of the query node and of the new internal node. Here I add a voting mechanism (simply a mode) between clades involved: of the parent, target and query nodes.
ivan-aksamentov
changed the title
add debug printouts to investigate clade mismatch against nearest node
fix: clade mismatch against nearest node
Oct 18, 2024
…rest node" This reverts commit ee51953.
ivan-aksamentov
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 18, 2024
Followup of: #1526 Additionally to moving clade let's also move "aa" label
rneher
approved these changes
Oct 18, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks good to me. But this only works for the default clade attribute at the moment, not for the dynamics clade-like attributes.
This just extends the voting to not only clade_membership clade, but to other clade-like attributes which might be present on the tree (in `.meta.extensions.nextclade`)
It was missing the `.value`
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #1525
After the query node placement is adjusted during the greedy tree building, sometimes the branch needs to be split and a new internal node inserted.
Currently we copy the clade of this internal node from the attachment target node. However, this is not always correct and can lead to mismatch between clade of the query node and of the new internal node.
Here I add a voting mechanism (simply a mode) between clades involved: of the parent, target and query nodes.