[Feature] Support add/drop field for struct column(part1) (backport #46451)

[mergify]

Why I'm doing:

It is the first pr to support add/drop field for struct column.

What I'm doing:

The main changes in this PR are two fold:

1. Adding a unique ID to the fields in the struct column. Each field column can be uniquely identified by its name and ID.
2. When creating a column reader for the struct column, the corresponding reader will be created for each field based on the provided column.

Fixes #46452

What type of PR is this:

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• Feature removed
• Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• This is a backport pr

Bugfix cherry-pick branch check:

• I have checked the version labels which the pr will be auto-backported to the target branch
  • 3.3
  • 3.2
  • 3.1
  • 3.0
  • 2.5

---

This is an automatic backport of pull request #46451 done by [Mergify](https://mergify.com). ## Why I'm doing: It is the first pr to support add/drop field for struct column.

What I'm doing:

The main changes in this PR are two fold:

1. Adding a unique ID to the fields in the struct column. Each field column can be uniquely identified by its name and ID.
2. When creating a column reader for the struct column, the corresponding reader will be created for each field based on the provided column.

Fixes #46452

What type of PR is this:

• BugFix
• Feature
• Enhancement
• Refactor
• UT
• Doc
• Tool

Does this PR entail a change in behavior?

• Yes, this PR will result in a change in behavior.
• No, this PR will not result in a change in behavior.

If yes, please specify the type of change:

• Interface/UI changes: syntax, type conversion, expression evaluation, display information
• Parameter changes: default values, similar parameters but with different default values
• Policy changes: use new policy to replace old one, functionality automatically enabled
• Feature removed
• Miscellaneous: upgrade & downgrade compatibility, etc.

Checklist:

• I have added test cases for my bug fix or my new feature
• This pr needs user documentation (for new or modified features or behaviors)
  • I have added documentation for my new feature or new function
• This is a backport pr

[mergify]

Cherry-pick of 757f142 has failed:

On branch mergify/bp/branch-3.2/pr-46451
Your branch is up to date with 'origin/branch-3.2'.

You are currently cherry-picking commit 757f14205a.
  (fix conflicts and run "git cherry-pick --continue")
  (use "git cherry-pick --skip" to skip this patch)
  (use "git cherry-pick --abort" to cancel the cherry-pick operation)

Changes to be committed:
	modified:   be/src/storage/metadata_util.cpp
	modified:   be/src/storage/tablet_schema.h
	modified:   be/test/storage/rowset/column_reader_writer_test.cpp
	modified:   be/test/storage/rowset/map_column_rw_test.cpp
	modified:   fe/fe-core/src/main/java/com/starrocks/catalog/StructField.java
	modified:   gensrc/thrift/Types.thrift

Unmerged paths:
  (use "git add/rm <file>..." as appropriate to mark resolution)
	both modified:   be/src/storage/rowset/column_reader.cpp
	both modified:   be/src/storage/rowset/column_reader.h
	both modified:   be/src/storage/rowset/segment.cpp
	deleted by us:   be/test/storage/rowset/flat_json_column_rw_test.cpp
	both modified:   be/test/storage/rowset/struct_column_rw_test.cpp

To fix up this pull request, you can check it out locally. See documentation: https://docs.github.com/en/pull-requests/collaborating-with-pull-requests/reviewing-changes-in-pull-requests/checking-out-pull-requests-locally

[mergify]

@mergify[bot]: Backport conflict, please reslove the conflict and resubmit the pr

[sonarcloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud