Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[New Check]: Check timestamps ascending with nans #480

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Aug 8, 2024

Conversation

alessandratrapani
Copy link
Collaborator

Motivation

Fix #476

@alessandratrapani alessandratrapani linked an issue Jul 30, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
3 tasks
@bendichter
Copy link
Contributor

@alessandratrapani this looks great! Can you also please add a section in the best practices document?

@alessandratrapani alessandratrapani marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2024 14:52
@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD enabled auto-merge (squash) August 8, 2024 14:57
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 87.14%. Comparing base (4bf8cef) to head (d2d641b).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              dev     #480      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.07%   87.14%   +0.07%     
==========================================
  Files          23       23              
  Lines        1253     1260       +7     
==========================================
+ Hits         1091     1098       +7     
  Misses        162      162              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 87.14% <100.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Coverage Δ
src/nwbinspector/checks/time_series.py 95.31% <100.00%> (+0.31%) ⬆️
src/nwbinspector/utils.py 88.61% <100.00%> (+0.28%) ⬆️

@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD merged commit fde2edf into dev Aug 8, 2024
36 checks passed
@CodyCBakerPhD CodyCBakerPhD deleted the check_timestamps_ascending_with_nans branch August 8, 2024 15:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Bug]: check_timestamps_ascending is triggered when timestamps have NaNs
4 participants