-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 308
Issues: ESCOMP/CTSM
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Author
Label
Projects
Milestones
Assignee
Sort
Issues list
ndep always sent from CAM or DATM now
enhancement
new capability or improved behavior of existing capability
next
this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting.
#2813
opened Oct 4, 2024 by
mvertens
FATES needs a new 16 PFT, 4x5 historical landuse_timeseries file for ctsm5.3.0
#2810
opened Oct 3, 2024 by
glemieux
Array elevclass_o in mksurfdata_esmf/src/mkglcmecMod.F90 is not allocated before use.
bug
something is working incorrectly
test: mksurfdata
Test mksurfdata_esmf before merging
#2802
opened Sep 30, 2024 by
olyson
MPI timeout (?) sometimes in Izumi nag tests
bug
something is working incorrectly
#2800
opened Sep 30, 2024 by
samsrabin
Have long compset names that don't match -- fail with a graceful error
usability
Improve or clarify user-facing options
Potential typo/bug in EnergyFluxType.F90
bug
something is working incorrectly
#2793
opened Sep 27, 2024 by
cathyxinchangli
Add f19 16pft 1850 and Hist to list of surface dataset resolutions (for the PPE work)
bfb
bit-for-bit
enhancement
new capability or improved behavior of existing capability
priority: low
Background task that doesn't need to be done right away.
science
Enhancement to or bug impacting science
Deprecate and remove the --output_reals option in CLM_BLDNML_OPTS
#2790
opened Sep 25, 2024 by
ekluzek
3 tasks
aux_clm "clm-basic" tests fail as of ctsm5.3.0 because they need c13 in finidat
bfb
bit-for-bit
bug
something is working incorrectly
priority: high
High priority to fix/merge soon, e.g., because it is a problem in important configurations
testing
additions or changes to tests
landuse timeseries for 1979-2026 for ne120 resolution
enhancement
new capability or improved behavior of existing capability
science
Enhancement to or bug impacting science
Error in ctsm_sci nofire tests
bug
something is working incorrectly
science
Enhancement to or bug impacting science
testing
additions or changes to tests
Error in FatescoldLandUse testmod
bug
something is working incorrectly
testing
additions or changes to tests
Make using a 16-PFT fire emissions dataset in a 78-PFT run trigger an error
usability
Improve or clarify user-facing options
New CN matrix fails with single point sites with the new ctsm5.3 datasets.
bug
something is working incorrectly
next
this should get some attention in the next week or two. Normally each Thursday SE meeting.
priority: low
Background task that doesn't need to be done right away.
science
Enhancement to or bug impacting science
Missing sa_leaf code from PPE branch in CanopyFluxesMod.F90
bug
something is working incorrectly
non-bfb
Changes answers (incl. adding tests)
science
Enhancement to or bug impacting science
mesh_maker adds extra longitude (360) to mesh file
bug
something is working incorrectly
#2776
opened Sep 19, 2024 by
slevis-lmwg
mesh_maker doesn't work with surface dataset produced by subset_data
bug
something is working incorrectly
test: python
Pass clm_pymods test suite plus Python sys/unit tests before merging
#2774
opened Sep 19, 2024 by
samsrabin
Add User's Guide section about ctsm_pylib
bfb
bit-for-bit
documentation
additions or edits to user-facing documentation
Add ne3np4 to list of surface dataset resolutions
bfb
bit-for-bit
enhancement
new capability or improved behavior of existing capability
priority: low
Background task that doesn't need to be done right away.
science
Enhancement to or bug impacting science
Broken external links in Tech Note and User's Guide
bfb
bit-for-bit
bug
something is working incorrectly
documentation
additions or edits to user-facing documentation
Change format of ChangeLog/ChangeSum file to markdown starting with ctsm6.0.0
bfb
bit-for-bit
documentation
additions or edits to user-facing documentation
enhancement
new capability or improved behavior of existing capability
test: none
No tests required (e.g. tools/contrib)
usability
Improve or clarify user-facing options
Inconsistent naming: FATES_NPATCHES vs. FATES_NPATCH_AP
usability
Improve or clarify user-facing options
#2764
opened Sep 17, 2024 by
samsrabin
Don't allow SP, fates, or nofire tests to turn fire_emis on (and make sure our tests don't do this either)
bfb
bit-for-bit
enhancement
new capability or improved behavior of existing capability
usability
Improve or clarify user-facing options
Previous Next
ProTip!
Mix and match filters to narrow down what you’re looking for.