Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Specify the fields API #668

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

cbiesinger
Copy link
Collaborator

@cbiesinger cbiesinger commented Oct 28, 2024

spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cbiesinger
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks @TallTed, addresssed your comments.

spec/index.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cbiesinger cbiesinger added the agenda+ Regular CG meeting agenda items label Nov 13, 2024
@wseltzer
Copy link
Collaborator

wseltzer commented Nov 19, 2024

Discussed in 19 Nov 2024 WG call minutes. Not yet resolved.

@cbiesinger
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I addressed TallTed's comments.

@cbiesinger
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I have updated the PR to make it optional for a user agent to show a disclosure text/permission prompt.

spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@cbiesinger
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I've now also added a note that IDPs should support continue_on.

Copy link
Collaborator

@npm1 npm1 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The last bullet point about context/mode seems unrelated to fields, should it go with the rest or totally outside of the new dfn?


Note: Identity providers should support showing their own permission prompt using
{{IdentityAssertionResponse/continue_on}} when the `disclosure_shown_for` parameter
does not contain the fields required by the IDP. This is to support user agents that
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: support galore, use synonym sometimes?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
does not contain the fields required by the IDP. This is to support user agents that
does not contain the fields required by the IDP. This is to enable user agents that

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
agenda+ Regular CG meeting agenda items
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants