Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Trajopt clang-tidy clean-up v3 #414

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024
Merged

Trajopt clang-tidy clean-up v3 #414

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 16, 2024

Conversation

rjoomen
Copy link
Contributor

@rjoomen rjoomen commented Jul 16, 2024

No description provided.

@rjoomen rjoomen mentioned this pull request Jul 16, 2024
@rjoomen
Copy link
Contributor Author

rjoomen commented Jul 16, 2024

Who'd have thought retrofitting const is such a lot of work.

@Levi-Armstrong
Copy link
Contributor

Who'd have thought retrofitting const is such a lot of work.

Yea, this is one thing I had intentionally avoided doing because it can have performance impact that was not checked by the older version of clang-tidy, but now it will produce an error if you return a variable which was previous defined const.

@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong merged commit efd9b8d into master Jul 16, 2024
7 of 10 checks passed
@Levi-Armstrong Levi-Armstrong deleted the clang-tidy3 branch July 16, 2024 15:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants