-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Take for REEArray #162
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -1,7 +1,10 @@ | ||
use vortex::array::Array; | ||
use vortex::compute::flatten::{flatten, FlattenFn, FlattenedArray}; | ||
use vortex::array::primitive::PrimitiveArray; | ||
use vortex::array::{Array, ArrayRef}; | ||
use vortex::compute::flatten::{flatten, flatten_primitive, FlattenFn, FlattenedArray}; | ||
use vortex::compute::scalar_at::{scalar_at, ScalarAtFn}; | ||
use vortex::compute::take::{take, TakeFn}; | ||
use vortex::compute::ArrayCompute; | ||
use vortex::match_each_integer_ptype; | ||
use vortex::scalar::Scalar; | ||
use vortex::validity::ArrayValidity; | ||
use vortex_error::{VortexError, VortexResult}; | ||
|
@@ -17,6 +20,10 @@ impl ArrayCompute for REEArray { | |
fn scalar_at(&self) -> Option<&dyn ScalarAtFn> { | ||
Some(self) | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn take(&self) -> Option<&dyn TakeFn> { | ||
Some(self) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl FlattenFn for REEArray { | ||
|
@@ -45,3 +52,39 @@ impl ScalarAtFn for REEArray { | |
scalar_at(self.values(), self.find_physical_index(index)?) | ||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
impl TakeFn for REEArray { | ||
fn take(&self, indices: &dyn Array) -> VortexResult<ArrayRef> { | ||
let primitive_indices = flatten_primitive(indices)?; | ||
let physical_indices = match_each_integer_ptype!(primitive_indices.ptype(), |$P| { | ||
primitive_indices | ||
.typed_data::<$P>() | ||
.iter() | ||
.map(|idx| { | ||
self.find_physical_index(*idx as usize) | ||
.map(|loc| loc as u64) | ||
}) | ||
.collect::<VortexResult<Vec<_>>>()? | ||
}); | ||
take(self.values(), &PrimitiveArray::from(physical_indices)) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is the same pattern that happens in Dict array, repeated value take on some dictionary. |
||
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
#[cfg(test)] | ||
mod test { | ||
use vortex::array::downcast::DowncastArrayBuiltin; | ||
use vortex::array::primitive::PrimitiveArray; | ||
use vortex::compute::take::take; | ||
|
||
use crate::REEArray; | ||
|
||
#[test] | ||
fn ree_take() { | ||
let ree = REEArray::encode(&PrimitiveArray::from(vec![ | ||
1, 1, 1, 4, 4, 4, 2, 2, 5, 5, 5, 5, | ||
])) | ||
.unwrap(); | ||
let taken = take(&ree, &PrimitiveArray::from(vec![9, 8, 1, 3])).unwrap(); | ||
assert_eq!(taken.as_primitive().typed_data::<i32>(), &[5, 5, 1, 4]); | ||
} | ||
} |
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this should just be a search_sorted? Possibly this? #164
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That said, an iterator would allow us to apply the offset inline without allocating a new buffer
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is just search sorted. That’s what find_physical_index does
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, but a lot of function calls, vs search_sorted_many
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sure