-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 76
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make sure we remove the right patch from the image viewer when removing the slit overlay #803
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #803 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 67.21% 67.12% -0.09%
==========================================
Files 65 65
Lines 4612 4618 +6
==========================================
Hits 3100 3100
- Misses 1512 1518 +6
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
Hmm... @rosteen and @javerbukh should have a look given they are attempting these PRs that sound related: |
As far as I can tell this breaks the slit overlay plugin. Unchecking the |
I'll investigate! |
7365518
to
1d0e35b
Compare
@rosteen - could you try again? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks like the bug I was seeing is fixed, I can toggle slit visibility from the plugin again. Green checks on codecov would be nice, but I'm approving.
If this works now and unblocks the rest of the PRs, I think we should just merge. 😉 |
That sounded like a second approval to me XD |
Description
While testing out #762 I ran across a bug which was that the code to remove the slit overlay was assuming things about the order and number of marks in the figure, which caused an error of the type
x not in list
. This PR should fix it by making sure we remove the right mark.Checklist for package maintainer(s)
This checklist is meant to remind the package maintainer(s) who will review this pull request of some common things to look for. This list is not exhaustive.
trivial
label.CHANGES.rst
?