-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revenue & Cashflow Profile #16
Conversation
…date Util_eff to allow for temperatures above 373 by assuming efficiency os the same, given the plant is the same (usually flash)
…e and Payoff years
… code (commented out)
…specific output file
… (can be re-added if issue/repro/unit test are identified)
@@ -84,6 +85,7 @@ | |||
0.4, | |||
0.4, | |||
0.4, | |||
0.4, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@malcolm-dsider Do we not expect utilization efficiency to increase between 374C and 600C?
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ Simulation Metadata | |||
Project IRR: 0.00 % | |||
Project VIR=PI=PIR: -0.02 | |||
Project MOIC: -0.72 | |||
Project Payback Period: 0.00 yr |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@malcolm-dsider Looks like an oversight?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Oh, I see, payback period is 0.00 if NPV is negative (i.e. it will never payback)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I changed output to be 'N/A' instead of 0.00
Yes, but we don’t have data on it, so I went with the safe answer of the same efficiency
From: Jonathan Pezzino ***@***.***>
Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 12:22 PM
To: softwareengineerprogrammer/GEOPHIRES-X ***@***.***>
Cc: Malcolm Ross ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [softwareengineerprogrammer/GEOPHIRES-X] Revenue & Cashflow Profile (PR #16)
@softwareengineerprogrammer commented on this pull request.
_____
In src/geophires_x/GeoPHIRESUtils.py <#16 (comment)> :
@@ -84,6 +85,7 @@
0.4,
0.4,
0.4,
+ 0.4,
@malcolm-dsider <https://github.com/malcolm-dsider> Do we not expect utilization efficiency to increase between 374C and 600C?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#16 (review)> , or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AWGVYT3DV2MGY7IAY372WM3YWS3V7AVCNFSM6AAAAABEFM4SKGVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMYTSMJUHE4TSNJYGQ> .
You are receiving this because you were mentioned. <https://github.com/notifications/beacon/AWGVYT4LSKGTPKWSNPUQL53YWS3V7A5CNFSM6AAAAABEFM4SKGWGG33NNVSW45C7OR4XAZNRKB2WY3CSMVYXKZLTORJGK5TJMV32UY3PNVWWK3TUL5UWJTTSESJSA.gif> Message ID: ***@***.*** ***@***.***> >
|
Merging this into my fork to designate it as acceptably stable/complete for PR into main repo. Will link main repo PR here once created. |
@@ -493,15 +538,20 @@ def extract_table_header(lines: list) -> list: | |||
return None | |||
|
|||
def _get_ccus_profile(self): | |||
""" | |||
FIXME TODO - transform from revenue & cashflow if present (CCUS profile replaced by revenue & cashflow | |||
profile in 49ff3a1213ac778ed53120626807e9a680d1ddcf) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Rebase & adaptation of malcolm-dsider#3
https://github.com/users/softwareengineerprogrammer/projects/3?pane=issue&itemId=49706715