Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add package_hooks_linter #178

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MichaelChirico
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #174

Copy link
Member

@mpadge mpadge left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thanks!

@mpadge mpadge mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2024
5 tasks
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 26, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.72%. Comparing base (e55dfca) to head (6137f57).
Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #178   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   41.72%   41.72%           
=======================================
  Files          11       11           
  Lines         266      266           
=======================================
  Hits          111      111           
  Misses        155      155           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mpadge mpadge merged commit 3d6e4da into ropensci-review-tools:main Sep 26, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Consider lintr::linters_with_tags("package_development")
2 participants