Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rm internal 'seq_linter' for lintr version to fix #172 #176

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Sep 26, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mpadge
Copy link
Member

@mpadge mpadge commented Sep 25, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 25, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 41.72%. Comparing base (c3b60fb) to head (10553fb).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #176      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   36.12%   41.72%   +5.60%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines         310      266      -44     
==========================================
- Hits          112      111       -1     
+ Misses        198      155      -43     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mpadge mpadge requested a review from maelle September 25, 2024 12:31
Copy link
Contributor

@maelle maelle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mpadge mpadge changed the title rm internal 'seq_linter' for lintr version for #172 rm internal 'seq_linter' for lintr version to fix #172 Sep 26, 2024
@mpadge mpadge merged commit 80d6482 into main Sep 26, 2024
7 checks passed
@mpadge mpadge deleted the seq-linter branch September 26, 2024 09:37
@mpadge mpadge mentioned this pull request Sep 26, 2024
5 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants