Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Avoid bottlenecks in variable matching. #4178

Merged

Conversation

HechtiDerLachs
Copy link
Collaborator

Unfortunately I already ran into the first encounter where my recent "speedup" actually led to a regression. This should fix it.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 84.59%. Comparing base (ca727c8) to head (ddb20cb).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #4178      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   84.60%   84.59%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         631      631              
  Lines       84813    84817       +4     
==========================================
- Hits        71753    71750       -3     
- Misses      13060    13067       +7     
Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/Rings/MPolyMap/Types.jl 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
src/Rings/mpolyquo-localizations.jl 73.46% <100.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Copy link
Member

@fingolfin fingolfin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks sensible to me

@fingolfin fingolfin merged commit 9cda843 into oscar-system:master Oct 7, 2024
29 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants