Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SUPP0RT-1586: remove some date manipulation #250

Closed

Conversation

sinejespersen
Copy link
Contributor

@sinejespersen sinejespersen commented Jul 30, 2024

Link to ticket

https://jira.itkdev.dk/browse/SUPP0RT-1586

Description

The input was broken, so I figure maybe the repeating rules were not saved correctly.

error

I am not sure what goes before this, but it seems this pr introduced the error.

@sinejespersen sinejespersen requested a review from tuj July 30, 2024 12:30
const scheduleDate = new Date(
date.getTime() + 60 * 1000 * date.getTimezoneOffset()
);
const date = new Date(target.value);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

@tuj tuj Jul 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, update changelog and create a better description of the PR :)

@tuj tuj added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 30, 2024
@sinejespersen sinejespersen requested a review from tuj July 31, 2024 08:00
tuj
tuj previously approved these changes Jul 31, 2024
@sinejespersen sinejespersen changed the base branch from develop to main July 31, 2024 09:28
@sinejespersen sinejespersen changed the base branch from main to develop July 31, 2024 09:28
@sinejespersen sinejespersen dismissed tuj’s stale review July 31, 2024 09:28

The base branch was changed.

@tuj tuj closed this Aug 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants