Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-35300: MCD-pull: run after network-online.target in Azure #4423

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 4, 2024

Conversation

yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

This was originally reordered such that ovs-configuration was able to run when the reboot was skipped. See: #3858

This broke ARO since they require the network to be ready for the pull to happen (and generally, probably best for the network to be ready before attempting to pull the new OS image).

This fix aims to apply just to Azure, which is not ideal since it drifts the service definition, but if don't-reboot-on-metal and ARO have different dependency chains, this is the easiest middle ground.

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

This was originally reordered such that ovs-configuration was able to
run when the reboot was skipped. See: openshift#3858

This broke ARO since they require the network to be ready for the pull
to happen (and generally, probably best for the network to be ready
before attempting to pull the new OS image).

This fix aims to apply just to Azure, which is not ideal since it drifts
the service definition, but if don't-reboot-on-metal and ARO have
different dependency chains, this is the easiest middle ground.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jun 21, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi-zhang: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35300, which is valid.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This was originally reordered such that ovs-configuration was able to run when the reboot was skipped. See: #3858

This broke ARO since they require the network to be ready for the pull to happen (and generally, probably best for the network to be ready before attempting to pull the new OS image).

This fix aims to apply just to Azure, which is not ideal since it drifts the service definition, but if don't-reboot-on-metal and ARO have different dependency chains, this is the easiest middle ground.

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Jun 21, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2024

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 21, 2024
@yuqi-zhang yuqi-zhang marked this pull request as ready for review July 2, 2024 14:38
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 2, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from cheesesashimi and djoshy July 2, 2024 14:39
@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-azure

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jul 3, 2024

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 3, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 3, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sdodson, yuqi-zhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-hypershift

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 3, 2024

@yuqi-zhang: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-zones c7d6ec2 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-zones
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi-zones c7d6ec2 link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi-zones

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jul 4, 2024

/override ci/prow/e2e-hypershift

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 4, 2024

@sdodson: Overrode contexts on behalf of sdodson: ci/prow/e2e-hypershift

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-hypershift

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jul 4, 2024

/cherry-pick release-4.16

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@sdodson: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-4.16 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD edfb19f and 2 for PR HEAD c7d6ec2 in total

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 0f53196 into openshift:master Jul 4, 2024
16 of 18 checks passed
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi-zhang: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35300: Some pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

The following pull requests linked via external trackers have not merged:

These pull request must merge or be unlinked from the Jira bug in order for it to move to the next state. Once unlinked, request a bug refresh with /jira refresh.

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35300 has not been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

This was originally reordered such that ovs-configuration was able to run when the reboot was skipped. See: #3858

This broke ARO since they require the network to be ready for the pull to happen (and generally, probably best for the network to be ready before attempting to pull the new OS image).

This fix aims to apply just to Azure, which is not ideal since it drifts the service definition, but if don't-reboot-on-metal and ARO have different dependency chains, this is the easiest middle ground.

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@sdodson: new pull request created: #4453

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jul 4, 2024

/jira refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sdodson: Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35300: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged:

Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35300 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

/jira refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

This PR has been included in build ose-machine-config-operator-container-v4.17.0-202407040511.p0.g0f53196.assembly.stream.el9 for distgit ose-machine-config-operator.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants