Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPBUGS-35300: MCD-pull: run after network-online.target again #4422

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor

This was originally reordered such that ovs-configuration was able to run when the reboot was skipped. See: #3858

This broke ARO since they require the network to be ready for the pull to happen (and generally, probably best for the network to be ready before attempting to pull the new OS image).

Since the services have changed since then, ovs-configuration no longer depends on the existence of the firstboot file, so we should be able to untangle this dependency.

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

This was originally reordered such that ovs-configuration was able to
run when the reboot was skipped. See: openshift#3858

This broke ARO since they require the network to be ready for the pull
to happen (and generally, probably best for the network to be ready
before attempting to pull the new OS image).

Since the services have changed since then, ovs-configuration no longer
depends on the existence of the firstboot file, so we should be able to
untangle this dependency.
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 21, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2024

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Jun 21, 2024
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@yuqi-zhang: This pull request references Jira Issue OCPBUGS-35300, which is valid. The bug has been moved to the POST state.

3 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target version (4.17.0) matches configured target version for branch (4.17.0)
  • bug is in the state New, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, POST)

No GitHub users were found matching the public email listed for the QA contact in Jira ([email protected]), skipping review request.

The bug has been updated to refer to the pull request using the external bug tracker.

In response to this:

This was originally reordered such that ovs-configuration was able to run when the reboot was skipped. See: #3858

This broke ARO since they require the network to be ready for the pull to happen (and generally, probably best for the network to be ready before attempting to pull the new OS image).

Since the services have changed since then, ovs-configuration no longer depends on the existence of the firstboot file, so we should be able to untangle this dependency.

- What I did

- How to verify it

- Description for the changelog

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 21, 2024

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: yuqi-zhang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 21, 2024
@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

/test e2e-gcp-op
/test e2e-aws-ovn

@yuqi-zhang yuqi-zhang marked this pull request as ready for review June 26, 2024 20:59
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jun 26, 2024
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from djoshy and dkhater-redhat June 26, 2024 20:59
@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Since this might affect the functionality introduced in #3858, @sergiordlr would you be able to test whether this breaks that or not? ARO verified that this works for them on 4.14

If not, @ori-amizur could you find someone to verify that this wouldn't break bare metal non-reboot installs? Thanks!

@ori-amizur
Copy link
Contributor

If not, @ori-amizur could you find someone to verify that this wouldn't break bare metal non-reboot installs? Thanks!

We are going to test tomorrow, but I made a quick test today. It seems that one of the masters failed to complete installation - (crio service failed to start).

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jul 1, 2024

/test ?

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 1, 2024

@sdodson: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test 4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-images
  • /test cluster-bootimages
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-gcp-op
  • /test e2e-gcp-op-single-node
  • /test e2e-hypershift
  • /test images
  • /test unit
  • /test verify

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test 4.12-upgrade-from-stable-4.11-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • /test bootstrap-unit
  • /test e2e-aws-disruptive
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips-op
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change
  • /test e2e-aws-ovn-workers-rhel8
  • /test e2e-aws-proxy
  • /test e2e-aws-serial
  • /test e2e-aws-single-node
  • /test e2e-aws-upgrade-single-node
  • /test e2e-aws-workers-rhel8
  • /test e2e-azure
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
  • /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change
  • /test e2e-azure-upgrade
  • /test e2e-gcp-op-techpreview
  • /test e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
  • /test e2e-gcp-rt
  • /test e2e-gcp-rt-op
  • /test e2e-gcp-single-node
  • /test e2e-gcp-upgrade
  • /test e2e-metal-assisted
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
  • /test e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • /test e2e-openstack
  • /test e2e-openstack-dualstack
  • /test e2e-openstack-externallb
  • /test e2e-openstack-parallel
  • /test e2e-ovirt
  • /test e2e-ovirt-upgrade
  • /test e2e-ovn-step-registry
  • /test e2e-vsphere
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi-zones
  • /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-zones
  • /test e2e-vsphere-upgrade
  • /test okd-e2e-aws
  • /test okd-e2e-gcp-op
  • /test okd-e2e-upgrade
  • /test okd-e2e-vsphere
  • /test okd-images
  • /test okd-scos-images
  • /test security

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-bootstrap-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-aws-ovn
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-gcp-op
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-gcp-op-single-node
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-gcp-op-techpreview
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-hypershift
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi-zones
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-e2e-vsphere-ovn-zones
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-images
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-security
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-unit
  • pull-ci-openshift-machine-config-operator-master-verify

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@sdodson
Copy link
Member

sdodson commented Jul 1, 2024

/test e2e-metal-assisted

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 1, 2024

@yuqi-zhang: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change 632de7c link false /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade-out-of-change
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-op-techpreview 632de7c link false /test e2e-gcp-op-techpreview
ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi 632de7c link false /test e2e-vsphere-ovn-upi
ci/prow/e2e-metal-assisted 632de7c link false /test e2e-metal-assisted

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@ori-amizur
Copy link
Contributor

Made 2 tests - both failed. It means this change causes assisted installer to fail installations.

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for testing. We can for now make it Azure only via #4423 instead, and then circle back on this I guess. I don't really see another good option.

@ori-amizur were you able to capture why it failed?

@ori-amizur
Copy link
Contributor

were you able to capture why it failed?

I tried to look briefly at the cluster but I didn't find the reason it failed.

@yuqi-zhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

This will break other things, so closing in favour of other solutions

@yuqi-zhang yuqi-zhang closed this Jul 10, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Jira bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants