Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use local abstractions sources instead of packages #92

Conversation

Yury-Fridlyand
Copy link
Collaborator

Signed-off-by: Yury-Fridlyand [email protected]

Description

Abstractions lib sources were copied into .net client to use in tests. No need any more to store local nuget packages of abstractions, release them or worry about outdated/broken references to them.
Few fixes were made to let workflows pass. I have also update license headers to comply with #69/#78.

See Bit-Quill#40 for more details.

This PR follows option 2 in #86.

Issues Resolved

#86

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@Xtansia Xtansia left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the perspective of getting these repos merged with the fewest changes, this is really good. However I'd really like to see the solutions properly reconciled into one, rather than this nesting. Whether that should be part of this or a follow up pass instead is another question.

abstractions/src/Directory.Build.props Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
… `main/HEAD` @ 63bac1681.

* Copy abstractions sources
* Adopt the abstractions migration
* Merge misc files

Signed-off-by: Yury-Fridlyand <[email protected]>
@Yury-Fridlyand Yury-Fridlyand force-pushed the dev-os-2.0-integ-local-abstractions branch from e1a5fa5 to 6d39fde Compare September 1, 2022 16:46
MitchellGale
MitchellGale previously approved these changes Sep 1, 2022
dblock
dblock previously approved these changes Sep 2, 2022
Copy link
Member

@dblock dblock left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can we please cleanup the README in abstractions/ before merging?

| Yury Fridlyand | [Yury-Fridlyand](https://github.com/Yury-Fridlyand) | Bit Quill |
| Max Ksyunz | [MaxKsyunz](https://github.com/MaxKsyunz) | Bit Quill |
| Forest Vey | [forestmvey](https://github.com/forestmvey) | Bit Quill |
| Mitchell Gale | [MitchellGale-BitQuill](https://github.com/MitchellGale-BitQuill) | Bit Quill |
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So we're merging maintainers? :) This can be cleaned up later.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We are merging everything!

* `MAJOR.MINOR.PATH` where `MAJOR` is still supported as defined by the EOL policy of OpenSearch.
* Note if the version exists but is not yet released it will resolve as a build candidate

## Project Resources
Copy link
Member

@dblock dblock Sep 2, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Delete all the non-abstraction parts. Things like COC are all at the root, we can't/shouldn't have duplicates in various parts of the repo.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Updated, thanks!

…ions-no-build

Integrate abstractions projects into client build.
@Yury-Fridlyand Yury-Fridlyand dismissed stale reviews from dblock and MitchellGale via 98fe5f9 September 3, 2022 01:59
@dblock dblock requested a review from VachaShah September 5, 2022 16:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants