[Backport 2.x] Fix passing wrong parameter when calling newConfigurationException() in DotExpanderProcessor

[gaobinlong]

Description

Backport #10737

Related Issues

#10734

Check List

• New functionality includes testing.
  • All tests pass
• New functionality has been documented.
  • New functionality has javadoc added
• Failing checks are inspected and point to the corresponding known issue(s) (See: Troubleshooting Failing Builds)
• Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff
• Commit changes are listed out in CHANGELOG.md file (See: Changelog)
• Public documentation issue/PR created

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

[github-actions]

Compatibility status:

Checks if related components are compatible with change 37d904b

Incompatible components

Incompatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer.git]

Skipped components

Compatible components

Compatible components: [https://github.com/opensearch-project/security-analytics.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/asynchronous-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/observability.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/custom-codecs.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/reporting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/job-scheduler.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/sql.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/notifications.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/common-utils.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/security.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/anomaly-detection.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/ml-commons.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/neural-search.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/index-management.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/cross-cluster-replication.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/alerting.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/geospatial.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/k-nn.git, https://github.com/opensearch-project/performance-analyzer-rca.git]

[github-actions]

Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:

• RESULT: FAILURE ❌
• URL: https://build.ci.opensearch.org/job/gradle-check/29326/
• CommitID: d3f9c79
  Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green.
  Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[github-actions]

Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:

• RESULT: FAILURE ❌
• URL: https://build.ci.opensearch.org/job/gradle-check/29342/
• CommitID: 404688a
  Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green.
  Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[github-actions]

Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:

• RESULT: FAILURE ❌
• URL: https://build.ci.opensearch.org/job/gradle-check/29425/
• CommitID: 2f26ed2
  Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green.
  Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[gaobinlong]

Flaky test: #10798.

[github-actions]

Gradle Check (Jenkins) Run Completed with:

• RESULT: FAILURE ❌
• URL: https://build.ci.opensearch.org/job/gradle-check/29466/
• CommitID: 2f26ed2
  Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green.
  Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[github-actions]

❌ Gradle check result for e21dad9: FAILURE

Please examine the workflow log, locate, and copy-paste the failure(s) below, then iterate to green. Is the failure a flaky test unrelated to your change?

[github-actions]

❕ Gradle check result for 37d904b: UNSTABLE

• TEST FAILURES:

      1 org.opensearch.smoketest.SmokeTestMultiNodeClientYamlTestSuiteIT.test {yaml=pit/10_basic/Delete all}
      1 org.opensearch.search.SearchWeightedRoutingIT.testShardRoutingWithNetworkDisruption_FailOpenEnabled

Please review all flaky tests that succeeded after retry and create an issue if one does not already exist to track the flaky failure.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (6dfee75) 70.99% compared to head (37d904b) 71.04%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on 2.x.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##                2.x   #11013      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     70.99%   71.04%   +0.04%     
+ Complexity    59088    59069      -19     
============================================
  Files          4869     4869              
  Lines        278629   278629              
  Branches      40824    40824              
============================================
+ Hits         197825   197961     +136     
+ Misses        64110    63885     -225     
- Partials      16694    16783      +89     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[gaobinlong]

The failed tests are flaky: #9332, #10673.

[gaobinlong]

@reta ,could this backport PR be merged now?