Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix logQ(P) estimation used for finding the minimum ring dimension #796
Fix logQ(P) estimation used for finding the minimum ring dimension #796
Changes from all commits
fd21f33
e9169e0
ea84986
64fd25b
9bbbf5c
cb714a0
0cd4df6
38631ac
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not adding the +1 anymore? The same comment for the occurrences below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't see why + 1 is needed in the current version of OpenFHE. Maybe in an old version (of PALISADE), we sometimes had larger moduli (NextPrime might have been used). So in my mind, ceil(logq/dcrtBits) is sufficient and guarantees that that logq<=k*dcrtBits. Moreover, adding + 1 would cause problems in the new estimation logic (getting an extra RNS limb when it is not needed).