-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 51
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] FIx smoothing and aggregation for unbalanced expected #466
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -302,7 +302,9 @@ def make_diag_tables(clr, regions, regions2=None, clr_weight_name="weight"): | |
regions2 = bioframe.make_viewframe( | ||
regions2, check_bounds=clr.chromsizes | ||
).to_numpy() | ||
except ValueError: # If there are non-unique entries in regions1/2, possible only for asymmetric expected: | ||
except ( | ||
ValueError | ||
): # If there are non-unique entries in regions1/2, possible only for asymmetric expected: | ||
regions = pd.concat( | ||
[ | ||
bioframe.make_viewframe([region], check_bounds=clr.chromsizes) | ||
|
@@ -1017,25 +1019,43 @@ def expected_cis( | |
|
||
# additional smoothing and aggregating options would add columns only, not replace them | ||
if smooth: | ||
if clr_weight_name is None: | ||
# result["count.avg"] = result["count.sum"] / result["n_valid"] | ||
cols = { | ||
"dist": "dist", | ||
"n_pixels": _NUM_VALID, | ||
"n_contacts": "count.sum", | ||
"contact_freq": "count.avg", | ||
"smooth_suffix": ".smoothed", | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Consider renaming "suffix", "smooth suffix seems rather confusing and hard to generalize in future. |
||
} | ||
else: | ||
cols = expected_smoothing.DEFAULT_CVD_COLS | ||
|
||
result_smooth = expected_smoothing.agg_smooth_cvd( | ||
result, | ||
sigma_log10=smooth_sigma, | ||
result, sigma_log10=smooth_sigma, cols=cols | ||
) | ||
# add smoothed columns to the result (only balanced for now) | ||
result = result.merge( | ||
result_smooth[["balanced.avg.smoothed", _DIST]], | ||
result_smooth[[cols["contact_freq"] + cols["smooth_suffix"], _DIST]], | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I find this notation very hard to read. Is it possible to retain something like this? I endorse both readability and flexibility of the code, and here it looks like the balance is shifted towards flexibility. |
||
on=[_REGION1, _REGION2, _DIST], | ||
how="left", | ||
) | ||
if aggregate_smoothed: | ||
result_smooth_agg = expected_smoothing.agg_smooth_cvd( | ||
result, | ||
groupby=None, | ||
sigma_log10=smooth_sigma, | ||
).rename(columns={"balanced.avg.smoothed": "balanced.avg.smoothed.agg"}) | ||
result, groupby=None, sigma_log10=smooth_sigma, cols=cols | ||
).rename( | ||
columns={ | ||
cols["contact_freq"] | ||
+ cols["smooth_suffix"]: cols["contact_freq"] | ||
+ cols["smooth_suffix"] | ||
+ ".agg" | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ".agg" is not in the cols dict anymore, although it's another type of suffix! |
||
} | ||
) | ||
# add smoothed columns to the result | ||
result = result.merge( | ||
result_smooth_agg[["balanced.avg.smoothed.agg", _DIST]], | ||
result_smooth_agg[ | ||
[cols["contact_freq"] + cols["smooth_suffix"] + ".agg", _DIST] | ||
], | ||
on=[ | ||
_DIST, | ||
], | ||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -476,6 +476,54 @@ def test_expected_smooth_cli(request, tmpdir): | |
assert _delta_smooth_agg < 0.02 | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_expected_smooth_nobalance_cli(request, tmpdir): | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I like this test |
||
# CLI compute-expected for chrom-wide cis-data | ||
in_cool = op.join(request.fspath.dirname, "data/CN.mm9.1000kb.cool") | ||
out_cis_expected = op.join(tmpdir, "cis_unb.exp.tsv") | ||
runner = CliRunner() | ||
result = runner.invoke( | ||
cli, | ||
[ | ||
"expected-cis", | ||
"--smooth", | ||
"--aggregate-smoothed", | ||
"--clr-weight-name", | ||
"", | ||
"-o", | ||
out_cis_expected, | ||
in_cool, | ||
], | ||
) | ||
assert result.exit_code == 0 | ||
clr = cooler.Cooler(in_cool) | ||
cis_expected = pd.read_table(out_cis_expected, sep="\t") | ||
grouped = cis_expected.groupby(["region1", "region2"]) | ||
# full chromosomes in this example: | ||
for (chrom1, chrom2), group in grouped: | ||
assert chrom1 == chrom2 | ||
# work only on "large" crhomosomes, skip chrM and such | ||
if chrom1 not in ["chrM", "chrY", "chrX"]: | ||
# extract dense matrix and get desired expected: | ||
matrix = clr.matrix(balance=False).fetch(chrom1) | ||
desired_expected = np.where( | ||
group["dist"] < ignore_diags, | ||
np.nan, # fill nan for ignored diags | ||
_diagsum_symm_dense(matrix), | ||
) | ||
# do overall tolerance instead of element by element comparison | ||
# because of non-matching NaNs and "noiseness" of the non-smoothed | ||
# expected | ||
_delta_smooth = np.nanmax( | ||
np.abs(group["count.avg.smoothed"].to_numpy() - desired_expected) | ||
) | ||
_delta_smooth_agg = np.nanmax( | ||
np.abs(group["count.avg.smoothed.agg"].to_numpy() - desired_expected) | ||
) | ||
# some made up tolerances, that work for this example | ||
assert _delta_smooth < 2000 | ||
assert _delta_smooth_agg < 4000 | ||
|
||
|
||
def test_trans_expected_view_cli(request, tmpdir): | ||
# CLI compute expected for cis-data with arbitrary view | ||
# which cannot overlap. But it is symmetrical cis-case. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is this commented out line?