Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ensure the rule conversion leaves no metavariables #88

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

aabounegm
Copy link
Collaborator

@aabounegm aabounegm commented Feb 2, 2024

Closes #82


PR-Codex overview

Detailed summary

  • Added a new function objectHasMetavars to check if an object contains any metavariables.
  • Added helper functions bindingHasMetavars and attrHasMetavars to check if a binding or attribute contains any metavariables.
  • Updated the checkCond function to use the new objectHasMetavars function to check for metavariables in objects.

✨ Ask PR-Codex anything about this PR by commenting with /codex {your question}

@fizruk fizruk merged commit f48af77 into master Feb 2, 2024
5 checks passed
@fizruk fizruk deleted the check-for-metavars branch February 2, 2024 17:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Check that after applying a rule no metavariables are left
3 participants