Updated github action to use java 8 #86
Conversation
|
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@nylonee has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 12 minutes and 47 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe recent update in our project configuration involves a significant change in the Java development environment. Specifically, we've shifted the Java Development Kit (JDK) version used in our automated release process from version 11 to version 8. This modification ensures compatibility and potentially broadens support for environments relying on this older JDK version. Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/release-java.yml (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 2
.github/workflows/release-java.yml (2)
- 22-22: The change from JDK 11 to JDK 8 is correctly implemented in the workflow name.
- 25-25: The
java-versionis correctly updated to '8'. Ensure that all project dependencies and the codebase are compatible with Java 8 to avoid build or runtime issues.Verification successful
The verification script did not find any Java 11 specific features in the codebase, indicating compatibility with Java 8 as per the update in the
.github/workflows/release-java.ymlfile. This suggests that the project dependencies and the codebase should not encounter build or runtime issues due to Java version incompatibility based on the script's search criteria.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Verify if there are any Java 11 specific features or dependencies in the codebase rg --type java 'java\.time|var |record |sealed |pattern matching|instanceof' || echo "No Java 11 specific features found."Length of output: 159
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/release-java-8.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release-java.yml (1 hunks)
- build.sbt (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/release-java.yml
Additional comments: 3
.github/workflows/release-java-8.yml (1)
- 1-27: The workflow configuration looks correct and aligns with the PR's objective to ensure compatibility by using Java 8. Utilizing Temurin distribution and caching sbt dependencies are best practices that should enhance build performance.
build.sbt (2)
- 17-17: The downgrade of
logbackto version "1.3.14" aligns with ensuring compatibility with Java 8. Ensure that this version oflogbackdoes not introduce any known issues or regressions that could affect the project's logging functionality.- 26-26: The update in the dependency declaration to use the new
logbackVersionvariable is correctly implemented. This change ensures that the project's dependencies are managed in a centralized manner, making future updates more straightforward.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/release-java-8.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/release-java.yml (1 hunks)
- build.sbt (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
.github/workflows/release-java-8.yml (1)
- 7-8: The
permissionssetting grants write access to contents. Verify if this level of permission is necessary for the tasks performed by this workflow, as it's generally best practice to adhere to the principle of least privilege..github/workflows/release-java.yml (1)
- 28-33: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-29]
The conditional check for the "Rename fat JAR" and "Upload JAR to GitHub Release" steps based on the tag reference prefix has been removed according to the summary. However, this change is not visible in the provided code. If the condition was indeed removed, ensure that these steps are intended to run unconditionally, which could affect the release process.
build.sbt (1)
- 17-17: The
logbackVersionhas been updated to "1.3.11". However, the AI-generated summary mentions a change to "1.3.14". Verify the correct version to ensure compatibility and address the discrepancy.
| name: Test Java 8 | ||
|
|
||
| on: | ||
| pull_request: | ||
| branches: [ "main" ] | ||
|
|
||
| permissions: | ||
| contents: write | ||
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
|
|
||
| build: | ||
|
|
||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
|
|
||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: actions/checkout@v3 | ||
| - name: Set up JDK 8 | ||
| uses: actions/setup-java@v3 | ||
| with: | ||
| java-version: '8' | ||
| distribution: 'temurin' | ||
| cache: 'sbt' | ||
| - name: sbt validation | ||
| run: sbt "dependencyUpdatesFailBuild; unusedCompileDependenciesTest; undeclaredCompileDependenciesTest; test" | ||
| - name: Build fat JAR | ||
| run: sbt assembly |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure the workflow name accurately reflects its purpose, especially since it's not only testing but also building a fat JAR. Consider renaming it to more accurately describe its full scope, e.g., "Build and Test with Java 8".
| run: sbt "dependencyUpdatesFailBuild; unusedCompileDependenciesTest; undeclaredCompileDependenciesTest; test" | ||
| - name: Build fat JAR | ||
| run: sbt assembly |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The command in the "Build fat JAR" step might benefit from specifying the project or module if the repository contains multiple sbt projects. This ensures clarity and prevents potential issues when building the JAR.
| - name: sbt validation | ||
| run: sbt "dependencyUpdatesFailBuild; unusedCompileDependenciesTest; undeclaredCompileDependenciesTest; test" | ||
| - name: Build fat JAR | ||
| if: startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/') | ||
| run: sbt assembly | ||
| - name: Rename fat JAR | ||
| if: startsWith(github.ref, 'refs/tags/') |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [1-29]
The workflow still sets up JDK 11, which contradicts the PR's objective to align development with Java 8. If the intention is to maintain both Java 8 and Java 11 environments, clarify this in the documentation to avoid confusion.
Some users were facing problems with using java because the website still asks them to download Java 8, so let's see if I can compile this with java 8
Summary by CodeRabbit
logbackversion from "1.4.11" to "1.3.14".