Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add INRB-specific build pipeline #287

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024
Merged

Add INRB-specific build pipeline #287

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 4, 2024

Conversation

jameshadfield
Copy link
Member

@jameshadfield jameshadfield commented Nov 4, 2024

This branch represents (updated) code which has been in-use for a while now and generates the https://next.nextstrain.org/groups/inrb-mpox/clade-I build. The recent changes to ingested data (#283) has convinced me to merge this work into master in order to stay up-to-date and prevent the current situation where Eddy can't run the build until I update the branch he's using.

The changes in this PR are largely self-contained but do include one modification to the shared snakemake rules - if a config defines both 'private_sequences' and 'private_metadata' then private data will be merged in. The script which merges them should be replaced by augur merge in the future.

I'm awaiting confirmation from INRB that this is working well from them, and plan to merge once I know it's working so that they can then work from the master branch and as such stay up-to-date with the canonical pipeline.

Base automatically changed from james/clade-i-tweaks to master November 4, 2024 22:11
This includes one modification to the shared snakemake rules - if a
config defines both 'private_sequences' and 'private_metadata' then
private data will be merged in. The script which merges them should
be replaced by `augur merge` in the future.
@jameshadfield jameshadfield merged commit c15995b into master Nov 4, 2024
5 checks passed
@jameshadfield jameshadfield deleted the james/inrb-mk3 branch November 4, 2024 23:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants