Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update i18n (Japanese) #11

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2024
Merged

Update i18n (Japanese) #11

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 5, 2024

Conversation

nao1215
Copy link
Owner

@nao1215 nao1215 commented Sep 5, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced clarity of validation and error messages in Japanese, improving user understanding of feedback related to age, ID, and name validations.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected ambiguous terminology in error messages by replacing "ターゲット" (target) with "値" (value) for more accurate communication of validation issues.
  • Documentation

    • Updated Japanese translations in the localization files to ensure consistency and clarity in user-facing messages.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes involve updates to Japanese language error messages across several files, specifically replacing the term "ターゲット" (target) with "値" (value) to enhance clarity. This adjustment applies to validation messages related to age, ID, and name checks, ensuring that the messages more accurately reflect the nature of the values being validated. The overall functionality of the code remains unchanged.

Changes

File Change Summary
README.md, example_test.go, i18n/ja.yaml Updated Japanese error messages to replace "ターゲット" (target) with "値" (value) for improved clarity in validation feedback. Error messages were rephrased for better readability while retaining their original meanings.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(No sequence diagrams generated as the changes are primarily linguistic and do not involve modifications to control flow or new features.)

Poem

🐰 In the garden where values bloom,
A change was made to clear the gloom.
"ターゲット" now "値" we say,
For clearer paths in code's ballet.
Hopping forth with messages bright,
Validation's now a joyful sight! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 5, 2024

Code Metrics Report

main (da2277b) #11 (40faa5a) +/-
Coverage 81.2% 81.2% 0.0%
Test Execution Time 9s 8s -1s
Details
  |                     | main (da2277b) | #11 (40faa5a) | +/-  |
  |---------------------|----------------|---------------|------|
  | Coverage            |          81.2% |         81.2% | 0.0% |
  |   Files             |              6 |             6 |    0 |
  |   Lines             |            309 |           309 |    0 |
  |   Covered           |            251 |           251 |    0 |
+ | Test Execution Time |             9s |            8s |  -1s |

Reported by octocov

@nao1215 nao1215 merged commit a7c79ca into main Sep 5, 2024
19 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant