-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ROCm and ROCm Apex fixes for AMD workflows #4230
Conversation
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ jobs: | |||
run: | | |||
git clone https://github.com/ROCmSoftwarePlatform/apex.git | |||
cd apex | |||
git checkout torch_2.1_higher |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This branch comes from the suggestion here
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@rraminen and @jithunnair-amd - thoughts on this change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This branch is currently where we have the pytorch2.1-compatible changes. However, we were planning to move these changes into master branch so that it works with tip-of-tree upstream PyTorch.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@loadams We were planning on doing the branch refactor next week, but if we want to move forward here, let's merge this PR, and we can file another PR post-refactor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense, no need for this, we can wait until the changes are merged back into the master branch, thanks for the update.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jithunnair-amd - no rush, I was just trying to make things work for the MI200 tests to be all green, and this was one thing we would need, but we can wait until these changes are back in master - I'll close this PR for now and we can re-open if we need.
No description provided.