Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ROCm and ROCm Apex fixes for AMD workflows #4230

Closed
wants to merge 10 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

loadams
Copy link
Contributor

@loadams loadams commented Aug 29, 2023

No description provided.

@loadams loadams changed the title Loadams/rocm fixes ROCm and ROCm Apex fixes for AMD workflows Aug 29, 2023
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ jobs:
run: |
git clone https://github.com/ROCmSoftwarePlatform/apex.git
cd apex
git checkout torch_2.1_higher
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This branch comes from the suggestion here

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@rraminen and @jithunnair-amd - thoughts on this change?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This branch is currently where we have the pytorch2.1-compatible changes. However, we were planning to move these changes into master branch so that it works with tip-of-tree upstream PyTorch.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@loadams We were planning on doing the branch refactor next week, but if we want to move forward here, let's merge this PR, and we can file another PR post-refactor

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Makes sense, no need for this, we can wait until the changes are merged back into the master branch, thanks for the update.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@jithunnair-amd - no rush, I was just trying to make things work for the MI200 tests to be all green, and this was one thing we would need, but we can wait until these changes are back in master - I'll close this PR for now and we can re-open if we need.

@loadams loadams closed this Oct 18, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants