Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compliance condition Updated #82

Conversation

Ahsan-Toufiq
Copy link

#81

@shahzaibk23
Copy link
Member

@Ahsan-Toufiq @AbdulRauf-Sidd please resolve the comments. So, I can merge it.

@Ahsan-Toufiq
Copy link
Author

@Ahsan-Toufiq @AbdulRauf-Sidd please resolve the comments. So, I can merge it.

@shahzaibk23 could you please elaborate.
No comments seem to be visible to me.

Copy link
Member

@shahzaibk23 shahzaibk23 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

src/main/scala/components/Core.scala Show resolved Hide resolved
src/main/scala/components/Core.scala Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -185,7 +193,7 @@ class MemoryFetch extends Module {
}


when(io.writeEnable && io.aluResultIn(31, 28) === "h8".asUInt()){
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@SyedHassanUlHaq don't we need the second condition to be there, for compliance?
removing it doesn't break compliance?

@shahzaibk23 shahzaibk23 merged commit 3b293a3 into merledu:dev_csr_dccm_stall_fix Oct 1, 2024
1 check failed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants