-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 33
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix builds of SMEFT gg_tttt #632
Conversation
… in smeft (NB: THESE BREAK OTHER PROCESSES!) The "e+0" to "e + 0" fix breaks exponents elsehwre in eemumu/ggtt*...
… succeeds but the builds fails In make HRDCOD=0 (default) Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:19:2: error: #error This non-SM physics process only supports MGONGPU_HARDCODE_PARAM builds (madgraph5#439): please run "make HRDCOD=1" 19 | #error This non-SM physics process only supports MGONGPU_HARDCODE_PARAM builds (madgraph5#439): please run "make HRDCOD=1" | ^~~~~ Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.cc:33:47: error: exponent has no digits 33 | mdl_WH = slha.get_block_entry( "decay", 25, 4.070000e - 03 ); | ^~~~~~~~~ ... Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:535:43: error: ‘aS’ was not declared in this scope 535 | const fptype_sv mdl_gHgg2 = ( -7. * aS ) / ( 720. * M_PI ); | ^~ Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:541:64: error: conversion from ‘fptype_sv’ {aka ‘__vector(4) double’} to non-scalar type ‘const mgOnGpu::cxsmpl<double>’ requested 541 | constexpr cxsmpl<double> mdl_G__exp__3 = ( ( G ) * ( G ) * ( G ) ); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~ ... Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:542:33: error: ‘mdl_WH’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘mdl_dWH’? 542 | const fptype_sv mdl_dWH = mdl_WH * ( -0.24161 * mdl_dGf + 0.96644 * mdl_dgw + 0.4832199999999999 * mdl_dkH - 0.11186509426655467 * mdl_dWW + ( 0.36410378449238195 * mdl_cHj3 * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 + ( 0.17608307708657747 * mdl_cHl3 * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 + ( 0.1636 * mdl_cHG * mdl_MT__exp__2 * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 * ( -0.5 * mdl_gHgg2 * mdl_MH__exp__2 + mdl_gHgg1 * mdl_MT__exp__2 ) ) + ( mdl_cHW * ( -0.35937785117066967 * mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza + 0.006164 * mdl_cth * mdl_gHaa * mdl_sth + 0.00454 * mdl_gHza * mdl_sth__exp__2 ) * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza * mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 ) + ( mdl_cHWB * ( -0.00454 * mdl_cth * mdl_gHza * mdl_sth + mdl_gHaa * ( -0.0030819999999999997 + 0.006163999999999999 * mdl_sth__exp__2 ) ) * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza * mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 ) + ( mdl_cHB * ( -0.006163999999999999 * mdl_cth * mdl_gHaa * mdl_sth - 0.00454 * mdl_gHza * ( -1. + mdl_sth__exp__2 ) ) * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza * mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 ) + mdl_dWHc + mdl_dWHb + mdl_dWHta ); | ^~~~~~ | mdl_dWH ... In make HRDCOD=1 Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:118:29: error: exponent has no digits 118 | constexpr double mdl_WH = 4.070000e - 03; | ^~~~~~~~~ Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:381:56: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO::constexpr_pow(2.0e+0, 2.5e-1)’ Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:110:5: error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘void __assert_fail(const char*, const char*, unsigned int, const char*)’ 110 | assert( static_cast<double>( iexp ) == exp ); // NB would fail at compile time with "error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘void __assert_fail'" | ^~~~~~ ... Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:385:72: error: ‘ABS’ was not declared in this scope 385 | constexpr double mdl_propCorr = ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) / ( ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) + mdl_nb__10__exp___m_40 ); | ^~~ Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:398:49: error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘mgOnGpu::cxsmpl<FP> mgOnGpu::conj(const mgOnGpu::cxsmpl<FP>&) [with FP = double]’ 398 | constexpr cxsmpl<double> mdl_conjg__cbH = conj( mdl_cbH ); | ~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~ ...
Fix conflicts: epochX/cudacpp/CODEGEN/PLUGIN/CUDACPP_SA_OUTPUT/model_handling.py (essentially, a better clang formatting fix was already in upstream/master)
…il both for HARDCOD=0 and =1, will try to merge susy2
I have retried the smeft_gg_tttt builds in PR #632 after merging in also the latest 'susy2' fixes from PR #625. There are still many failures for both HRDCOD=0 (#616) and HRDCOD=1 (#614). It's quite clear that smeft has separate issues than susy, and it is quite obvious that these should be separate PRs. I will focus on susy instead then... |
…is ok (also added src/constexpr_math.h), builds fail for both HRDCOD=0 amd =1 For HRDCOD=1 (madgraph5#616), this is a (non-exhautive?) list of errors In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:121:31: error: exponent has no digits 121 | constexpr double mdl_WH = 4.070000e - 03; | ^~~~~~~~~ In file included from /usr/include/c++/11/cassert:44, from ../../src/constexpr_math.h:11, from ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:23, from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:384:58: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘mg5amcCpu::constexpr_pow(((long double)2.0e+0), ((long double)2.5e-1))’ ../../src/constexpr_math.h:55:5: error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘void __assert_fail(const char*, const char*, unsigned int, const char*)’ 55 | assert( static_cast<long double>( iexp ) == exp ); // NB would fail at compile time with "error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘void __assert_fail'" | ^~~~~~ In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:388:37: error: ‘ABS’ was not declared in this scope 388 | constexpr double mdl_propCorr = ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) / ( ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) + mdl_nb__10__exp___m_40 ); | ^~~ In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h: In function ‘const mg5amcCpu::Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO_dependentCouplings::DependentCouplings_sv mg5amcCpu::Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO_dependentCouplings::computeDependentCouplings_fromG(const fptype_sv&, const fptype*)’: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:554:45: error: ‘aS’ was not declared in this scope 554 | const fptype_sv mdl_gHgg2 = ( -7. * aS ) / ( 720. * M_PI ); | ^~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:560:66: error: conversion from ‘mg5amcCpu::fptype_sv’ {aka ‘__vector(4) double’} to non-scalar type ‘const mgOnGpu::cxsmpl<double>’ requested 560 | constexpr cxsmpl<double> mdl_G__exp__3 = ( ( G ) * ( G ) * ( G ) ); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(121): warning #2506-D: a user-provided literal suffix must begin with "_" Remark: The warnings can be suppressed with "-diag-suppress <warning-number>" ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(121): error: user-defined literal operator not found For HRDCOD=0 (madgraph5#614), this is a (non-exhautive?) list of errors In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h: In function ‘const mg5amcCpu::Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO_dependentCouplings::DependentCouplings_sv mg5amcCpu::Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO_dependentCouplings::computeDependentCouplings_fromG(const fptype_sv&, const fptype*)’: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:554:45: error: ‘aS’ was not declared in this scope 554 | const fptype_sv mdl_gHgg2 = ( -7. * aS ) / ( 720. * M_PI ); | ^~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:560:66: error: conversion from ‘mg5amcCpu::fptype_sv’ {aka ‘__vector(4) double’} to non-scalar type ‘const mgOnGpu::cxsmpl<double>’ requested 560 | constexpr cxsmpl<double> mdl_G__exp__3 = ( ( G ) * ( G ) * ( G ) ); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:561:35: error: ‘mdl_WH’ was not declared in this scope; did you mean ‘mdl_dWH’? 561 | const fptype_sv mdl_dWH = mdl_WH * ( -0.24161 * mdl_dGf + 0.96644 * mdl_dgw + 0.4832199999999999 * mdl_dkH - 0.11186509426655467 * mdl_dWW + ( 0.36410378449238195 * mdl_cHj3 * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 + ( 0.17608307708657747 * mdl_cHl3 * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 + ( 0.1636 * mdl_cHG * mdl_MT__exp__2 * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 * ( -0.5 * mdl_gHgg2 * mdl_MH__exp__2 + mdl_gHgg1 * mdl_MT__exp__2 ) ) + ( mdl_cHW * ( -0.35937785117066967 * mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza + 0.006164 * mdl_cth * mdl_gHaa * mdl_sth + 0.00454 * mdl_gHza * mdl_sth__exp__2 ) * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza * mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 ) + ( mdl_cHWB * ( -0.00454 * mdl_cth * mdl_gHza * mdl_sth + mdl_gHaa * ( -0.0030819999999999997 + 0.006163999999999999 * mdl_sth__exp__2 ) ) * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza * mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 ) + ( mdl_cHB * ( -0.006163999999999999 * mdl_cth * mdl_gHaa * mdl_sth - 0.00454 * mdl_gHza * ( -1. + mdl_sth__exp__2 ) ) * mdl_vevhat__exp__2 ) / ( mdl_gHaa * mdl_gHza * mdl_LambdaSMEFT__exp__2 ) + mdl_dWHc + mdl_dWHb + mdl_dWHta ); | ^~~~~~ | mdl_dWH ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(554): error: identifier "aS" is undefined ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(560): error: expression must have a constant value ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(560): note #2689-D: the value of variable "G" (550): here cannot be used as a constant ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(561): error: identifier "mdl_WH" is undefined
…but HRDCOD=0/1 builds still fail
I have also included the "susy" branch changes from PR #824. But smeft builds still fail, this requires slightly different types of fixes. |
…but HRDCOD=0/1 builds still fail -- For HRDCOD=0 (madgraph5#616), this is a (non-exhaustive?) list of errors In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h: In function ‘const mg5amcCpu::Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO_dependentCouplings::DependentCouplings_sv mg5amcCpu::Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO_dependentCouplings::computeDependentCouplings_fromG(const fptype_sv&, const double*)’: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:583:45: error: ‘aS’ was not declared in this scope 583 | const fptype_sv mdl_gHgg2 = ( -7. * aS ) / ( 720. * M_PI ); | ^~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:589:66: error: conversion from ‘mg5amcCpu::fptype_sv’ {aka ‘__vector(4) double’} to non-scalar type ‘const mgOnGpu::cxsmpl<double>’ requested 589 | constexpr cxsmpl<double> mdl_G__exp__3 = ( ( G ) * ( G ) * ( G ) ); | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(583): error: identifier "aS" is undefined ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(589): error: expression must have a constant value ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(589): note #2689-D: the value of variable "G" (579): here cannot be used as a constant -- For HRDCOD=1 (madgraph5#614), this is a (non-exhaustive?) list of errors In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:122:42: error: exponent has no digits 122 | __device__ constexpr double mdl_WH = 4.070000e - 03; | ^~~~~~~~~ In file included from /usr/include/c++/11/cassert:44, from ../../src/constexpr_math.h:11, from ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:23, from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:385:58: in ‘constexpr’ expansion of ‘mg5amcCpu::constexpr_pow(((long double)2.0e+0), ((long double)2.5e-1))’ ../../src/constexpr_math.h:55:5: error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘void __assert_fail(const char*, const char*, unsigned int, const char*)’ 55 | assert( static_cast<long double>( iexp ) == exp ); // NB would fail at compile time with "error: call to non-‘constexpr’ function ‘void __assert_fail'" | ^~~~~~ In file included from /usr/include/c++/11/cassert:44, from ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:106, from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: /usr/include/assert.h:67:13: note: ‘void __assert_fail(const char*, const char*, unsigned int, const char*)’ declared here 67 | extern void __assert_fail (const char *__assertion, const char *__file, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from /usr/include/c++/11/cassert:44, from ../../src/constexpr_math.h:11, from ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:23, from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:389:37: error: ‘ABS’ was not declared in this scope 389 | constexpr double mdl_propCorr = ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) / ( ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) + mdl_nb__10__exp___m_40 ); | ^~~ ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h:389:74: error: ‘ABS’ was not declared in this scope 389 | constexpr double mdl_propCorr = ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) / ( ABS( mdl_linearPropCorrections ) + mdl_nb__10__exp___m_40 ); | ^~~ In file included from CPPProcess.h:22, from Bridge.h:11, from fsampler.cc:8: ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(122): warning #2506-D: a user-provided literal suffix must begin with "_" Remark: The warnings can be suppressed with "-diag-suppress <warning-number>" ../../src/Parameters_SMEFTsim_topU3l_MwScheme_UFO.h(122): error: user-defined literal operator not found
…build: compute aS from G, fix and remove unnecessary calculation of G^3 Now 'make HRDCOD=0 FPTYPE=f' and 'make HRDCOD=0 FPTYPE=d' fail only because ABS is missing
… builds: replace ABS by std::abs
…RDCOD=0 FPTYPE=d tests CUDACPP_RUNTEST_DUMPEVENTS=1 ./runTest.exe
…om HRDCOD=0 FPTYPE=d tests CUDACPP_RUNTEST_DUMPEVENTS=1 ./runTest.exe cp ../../test/ref/dump* ../../../CODEGEN/PLUGIN/CUDACPP_SA_OUTPUT/test/ref/
…etter handling of aS, G^2, G^3 for SMEFT madgraph5#616 Note: generated code does not change here, only how it is generated
…adgraph5#616) builds: replace ABS by std::abs
Hi @oliviermattelaer this one about SMEFT is also ready for review now, can you have a look please? Note, again this builds on top of the previous PR #824 for SUSY. So if you prefer just look at SUSY first. The new fixes here are related, but much simpler in a way, so maybe easiest if you approve the SUSY 824 first. (Then the review of this 632 becomes easier after merging 824). Again, I am still running larger scale tests here in #632 before merging. But the review can already start. Thanks! (Note: the CI tests are ok now, I fixed the small pending issues about G^2 and G^3, which were strangely different in SUSY and SMEFT) |
…ng, I will make them shorter
…ec and LHE are ok! 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_smeftggtttt_mad/log_smeftggtttt_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_smeftggtttt_mad/log_smeftggtttt_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_smeftggtttt_mad/log_smeftggtttt_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt
… issues madgraph5#825 and madgraph5#826 are still open
…_h_bb and SM gg_bb for comparison, see madgraph5#828)
…(do not remove them completely yet?)
Good news, the 'tmad' tests (comparing fortran and cuda/cpp xsec and LHE) succeed for SMEFT gg_tttt. There are not the same issues as SUSY #825 or #826. I also tried to improve on the HEFT and define a different process, but I have a doubt #828. I am now rerunning large scale tests, then this is good to merge for me. |
STARTED AT Wed Mar 20 02:50:23 PM CET 2024 ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -mix -hrd -makej -eemumu -ggtt -ggttg -ggttgg -gqttq -ggttggg -makeclean ENDED(1) AT Wed Mar 20 06:23:49 PM CET 2024 [Status=0] ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -flt -hrd -makej -eemumu -ggtt -ggttgg -inlonly -makeclean ENDED(2) AT Wed Mar 20 06:51:12 PM CET 2024 [Status=0] ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -makej -eemumu -ggtt -ggttg -gqttq -ggttgg -ggttggg -flt -bridge -makeclean ENDED(3) AT Wed Mar 20 07:01:20 PM CET 2024 [Status=0] ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -eemumu -ggtt -ggttgg -flt -rmbhst ENDED(4) AT Wed Mar 20 07:04:44 PM CET 2024 [Status=0] ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -eemumu -ggtt -ggttgg -flt -curhst ENDED(5) AT Wed Mar 20 07:08:09 PM CET 2024 [Status=0] ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -eemumu -ggtt -ggttgg -flt -common ENDED(6) AT Wed Mar 20 07:11:36 PM CET 2024 [Status=0] ./tput/teeThroughputX.sh -flt -hrd -makej -susyggtt -susyggt1t1 -smeftggtttt -heftggh -makeclean ENDED(7) AT Wed Mar 20 07:35:11 PM CET 2024 [Status=0]
(SM tests) STARTED AT Wed Mar 20 07:35:11 PM CET 2024 ENDED AT Thu Mar 21 12:12:59 AM CET 2024 (BSM tests) STARTED AT Thu Mar 21 12:12:59 AM CET 2024 ENDED AT Thu Mar 21 12:21:27 AM CET 2024 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_eemumu_mad/log_eemumu_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_eemumu_mad/log_eemumu_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_eemumu_mad/log_eemumu_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttggg_mad/log_ggttggg_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttggg_mad/log_ggttggg_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttggg_mad/log_ggttggg_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttgg_mad/log_ggttgg_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttgg_mad/log_ggttgg_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttgg_mad/log_ggttgg_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttg_mad/log_ggttg_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttg_mad/log_ggttg_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggttg_mad/log_ggttg_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggtt_mad/log_ggtt_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggtt_mad/log_ggtt_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_ggtt_mad/log_ggtt_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_gqttq_mad/log_gqttq_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_gqttq_mad/log_gqttq_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_gqttq_mad/log_gqttq_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_smeftggtttt_mad/log_smeftggtttt_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_smeftggtttt_mad/log_smeftggtttt_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 24 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_smeftggtttt_mad/log_smeftggtttt_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 0 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_susyggt1t1_mad/log_susyggt1t1_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 0 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_susyggt1t1_mad/log_susyggt1t1_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 0 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_susyggt1t1_mad/log_susyggt1t1_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt 0 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_susyggtt_mad/log_susyggtt_mad_d_inl0_hrd0.txt 0 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_susyggtt_mad/log_susyggtt_mad_f_inl0_hrd0.txt 0 /data/avalassi/GPU2023/madgraph4gpuX/epochX/cudacpp/tmad/logs_susyggtt_mad/log_susyggtt_mad_m_inl0_hrd0.txt
All my tests are done, this is good to go for me. Can merge as soon as revieweed. |
I have updated this by merging in master after #824 susy was merged |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Will just need to made some change when upstream is ready with the required fix
… and SMEFT madgraph5#632) into heft
Thanks Olivier. We already merged this, now I just checked that I replied to all comments. All good for me. |
… and SMEFT madgraph5#632) into jtmk Fix minor conflicts: epochX/cudacpp/tput/throughputX.sh
This is a WIP MR including the process SMEFT gg_tttt relevant for @zeniheisser .
The builds fail both in HRDCOD=0 (#616) and HRDCOD=1 (#614)
cc: @zeniheisser @oliviermattelaer @roiser