Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: jsdoc failed but ci job not failed #608

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 19, 2024
Merged

Conversation

JeffreyDallas
Copy link
Contributor

@JeffreyDallas JeffreyDallas commented Sep 18, 2024

Description

This pull request changes the following:

  • fixing jsdoc failed but ci job not failed

Related Issues


Now ci job would fail if jsdoc reported errors

https://github.com/hashgraph/solo/actions/runs/10924368487/job/30323236542

image

Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Results - Linux

  1 files  ±0   19 suites  ±0   26s ⏱️ -1s
119 tests ±0  119 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
145 runs  ±0  145 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 888a402. ± Comparison against base commit b47414e.

Copy link
Contributor

Unit Test Results - Windows

  1 files  ±0   19 suites  ±0   53s ⏱️ -1s
119 tests ±0  119 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
145 runs  ±0  145 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 888a402. ± Comparison against base commit b47414e.

Copy link
Contributor

E2E Test Report

 10 files  ±0   20 suites  ±0   48m 15s ⏱️ -17s
168 tests ±0  168 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
171 runs  ±0  171 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 888a402. ± Comparison against base commit b47414e.

Copy link
Contributor

E2E Test Report

 10 files  ±0   20 suites  ±0   48m 15s ⏱️ -17s
168 tests ±0  168 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 
171 runs  ±0  171 ✅ ±0  0 💤 ±0  0 ❌ ±0 

Results for commit 888a402. ± Comparison against base commit b47414e.

Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
+0.02% (target: -1.00%)
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (b47414e) 4067 3293 80.97%
Head commit (888a402) 4071 (+4) 3297 (+4) 80.99% (+0.02%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#608) 0 0 ∅ (not applicable)

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

@JeffreyDallas JeffreyDallas merged commit 3f838f6 into main Sep 19, 2024
29 checks passed
@JeffreyDallas JeffreyDallas deleted the 0607-D-fix-jsdoc-failure branch September 19, 2024 15:42
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 19, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.86%. Comparing base (b47414e) to head (888a402).
Report is 27 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #608   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   80.86%   80.86%           
=======================================
  Files          37       37           
  Lines        4880     4880           
  Branches      683      683           
=======================================
  Hits         3946     3946           
  Misses        934      934           

Impacted file tree graph

swirlds-automation added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 4, 2024
## [0.31.0](v0.30.1...v0.31.0) (2024-10-04)

### Features

* Add '--mirror-node-version' flag to override default mirror node version ([#616](#616)) ([e4932c4](e4932c4))
* add quiet flag ([#621](#621)) ([b068c8f](b068c8f))
* convert hugo docs workflow calls to use Taskfile task ([#642](#642)) ([ae8d8bb](ae8d8bb))
* ensured user-provided values file takes precedence over solo-generated values ([#615](#615)) ([1b0ffc9](1b0ffc9))
* **logging:** Add the new custom process output class and inject it into the default list renderer options ([#622](#622)) ([efa1783](efa1783))
* separate commands for solo node delete ([#597](#597)) ([b251276](b251276))
* Separate network upgrade and freeze from node update/add/delete command ([#628](#628)) ([9b17937](9b17937))

### Bug Fixes

* Direct calling of node stop and start commands ([#636](#636)) ([7749b04](7749b04))
* **docs:** resolve issues due to npx in taskfile for the custom-network-config example ([038e6df](038e6df))
* jsdoc failed but ci job not failed ([#608](#608)) ([3f838f6](3f838f6))
* specify jvm env variables explicitly for local profile ([#405](#405)) ([3db7e08](3db7e08))
* **tests:** start Kind cluster on demand if not having a kube config errors ([#624](#624)) ([538e40d](538e40d))
* upgrade eslint config away from abandoned plugin ([#643](#643)) ([84d3dc5](84d3dc5))
@swirlds-automation
Copy link
Contributor

🎉 This PR is included in version 0.31.0 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

JSDoc check fails but does not fail the job
3 participants