-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use manual recursion for binary patterns #75212
Open
333fred
wants to merge
10
commits into
dotnet:main
Choose a base branch
from
333fred:no-stack-binary-patterns
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+745
−193
Open
Changes from 8 commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
1af114b
Use manual recursion for binary patterns
333fred 09dee11
Handle IOperation and CFG for deeply-nested patterns.
333fred d372b4b
Add one more location where binary patterns are visited, make the tes…
333fred c5124f3
Bugfixes
333fred 1595759
PR feedback.
333fred 22d8e1e
More feedback and fixes for CI breaks.
333fred 977493e
Another while->do conversion
333fred fc05825
Remove unnecessary assert
333fred 89a21fc
Reduce nested binary expressions to speed up test run, provide DebugV…
333fred 4d5160d
Only take 1 incremental snapshot, improving perf by over 10x.
333fred File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -339,6 +339,28 @@ public override void VisitBinaryExpression(BinaryExpressionSyntax node) | |
operands.Free(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
public override void VisitBinaryPattern(BinaryPatternSyntax node) | ||
{ | ||
// Like binary expressions, binary patterns are left-associative, and can be deeply nested (even in our own code). | ||
// Handle this with manual recursion. | ||
PatternSyntax currentPattern = node; | ||
|
||
var rightPatternStack = ArrayBuilder<PatternSyntax>.GetInstance(); | ||
|
||
while (currentPattern is BinaryPatternSyntax binaryPattern) | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think that results in less-clear code, like we have in |
||
{ | ||
rightPatternStack.Push(binaryPattern.Right); | ||
currentPattern = binaryPattern.Left; | ||
} | ||
|
||
do | ||
{ | ||
Visit(currentPattern); | ||
} while (rightPatternStack.TryPop(out currentPattern)); | ||
|
||
rightPatternStack.Free(); | ||
} | ||
|
||
public override void VisitInvocationExpression(InvocationExpressionSyntax node) | ||
{ | ||
if (receiverIsInvocation(node, out InvocationExpressionSyntax nested)) | ||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider splitting the tuple into two separate parameters.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It was originally separate parameters; I moved it to the tuple for simplicity of the calling code.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The method is not using the tuple as a tuple though. It feels like the caller should be responsible for deconstructing the tuple rather than the method.