Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: fix typo in run_train #1581

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

njzjz
Copy link
Member

@njzjz njzjz commented Jul 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Renamed internal function make_train_dp to run_train_dp for better clarity and consistency within the codebase.

(Note: This change does not impact end-user functionalities directly.)

Signed-off-by: Jinzhe Zeng <[email protected]>
@njzjz njzjz requested a review from wanghan-iapcm July 10, 2024 13:34
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 10, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The recent change involves renaming a function call within the run_train function in dpgen/generator/run.py from make_train_dp to run_train_dp based on the value of mlp_engine. This modification aims to improve code clarity and maintain consistency in naming conventions.

Changes

Files Change Summary
dpgen/generator/run.py Renamed function make_train_dp to run_train_dp within the run_train function and updated the function declaration accordingly.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant run_train
    participant run_train_dp

    User->>run_train: Execute run_train()
    run_train->>run_train_dp: Call run_train_dp() based on mlp_engine
    run_train_dp-->>run_train: Return result
    run_train-->>User: Return final result
Loading

Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2f39d12 and 44dc9c5.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • dpgen/generator/run.py (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
dpgen/generator/run.py (1)

Line range hint 625-628:
LGTM! Ensure test coverage for make_train.

The function logic appears correct. However, ensure that there are adequate tests covering different scenarios for this function.

Verification successful

Test coverage for make_train function verified

The make_train function is well-tested in the following file:

  • tests/generator/test_make_train.py
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that tests for `make_train` function exist.

# Test: Search for test cases for `make_train`. Expect: Test cases should be found.
rg --type python -A 5 $'make_train'

Length of output: 65


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that tests for `make_train` function exist.

# Find all Python files and search for test cases for `make_train`
fd -e py | xargs rg -A 5 $'make_train'

Length of output: 9279


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (2)
dpgen/generator/run.py (2)

731-733: Update function name to ensure consistency.

The function name make_train_dp needs to be updated to run_train_dp in the following locations within dpgen/generator/run.py:

  • Line where make_train_dp is called within the make_train function.

  • Definition of the make_train_dp function.

Analysis chain

Verify the function name update consistency.

Ensure that all instances of the function make_train_dp have been updated to run_train_dp throughout the codebase.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all instances of `make_train_dp` have been updated to `run_train_dp`.

# Test: Search for the function name `make_train_dp`. Expect: No occurrences.
rg --type python -A 5 $'make_train_dp'

Length of output: 68


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that all instances of `make_train_dp` have been updated to `run_train_dp`.

# Test: Search for the function name `make_train_dp`. Expect: No occurrences.
rg 'make_train_dp'

Length of output: 164


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: List all instances of `make_train_dp` in `dpgen/generator/run.py` to verify necessary updates.

# Search for the function name `make_train_dp` in `dpgen/generator/run.py` and display the lines.
rg 'make_train_dp' dpgen/generator/run.py -A 5 -B 5

Length of output: 542


Missing Test Coverage for run_train_dp

The function run_train_dp does not have direct test cases in the codebase. It is crucial to ensure that this function is adequately tested to cover various scenarios.

  • Action Required: Add test cases for the run_train_dp function to ensure it operates correctly under different conditions.
Analysis chain

Line range hint 734-882:
LGTM! Ensure test coverage for run_train_dp.

The function logic appears correct. However, ensure that there are adequate tests covering different scenarios for this function.

Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that tests for `run_train_dp` function exist.

# Test: Search for test cases for `run_train_dp`. Expect: Test cases should be found.
rg --type python -A 5 $'run_train_dp'

Length of output: 67


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify that tests for `run_train_dp` function exist.

# Test: Search for test cases for `run_train_dp`. Expect: Test cases should be found.
rg --type py -A 5 'run_train_dp'

Length of output: 641


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the presence of test files or directories and search for references to `run_train_dp` within those test files.

# Find all potential test files or directories
test_files=$(fd --type f --glob "*test*.py")

# Search for references to `run_train_dp` within the test files
for test_file in $test_files; do
    echo "Searching in $test_file:"
    rg 'run_train_dp' $test_file
done

Length of output: 10706

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 49.59%. Comparing base (2f39d12) to head (44dc9c5).
Report is 30 commits behind head on devel.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##            devel    #1581      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   49.02%   49.59%   +0.56%     
==========================================
  Files          83       83              
  Lines       14844    14844              
==========================================
+ Hits         7278     7362      +84     
+ Misses       7566     7482      -84     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@wanghan-iapcm wanghan-iapcm merged commit 30bc1e5 into deepmodeling:devel Jul 10, 2024
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants