Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG] Use len_with_deleted instead of len #3431

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 8, 2025
Merged

Conversation

eculver
Copy link
Contributor

@eculver eculver commented Jan 8, 2025

Description of changes

This is a follow-up from #3424 - where I had added code to fix the bug in compaction but then forgot to replace the method at the actual callsite with the new method 🤦🏼 .

This updates the problem code to use len_with_deleted instead of just len so that the resize actually gets triggered.

Some additional context: we decided not to change the behavior of the existing len method in case other callers were depending on existing behavior. In other words, we didn't want to introduce accidentally introduce bugs that were relying on the "buggy" code.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Jan 8, 2025

Reviewer Checklist

Please leverage this checklist to ensure your code review is thorough before approving

Testing, Bugs, Errors, Logs, Documentation

  • Can you think of any use case in which the code does not behave as intended? Have they been tested?
  • Can you think of any inputs or external events that could break the code? Is user input validated and safe? Have they been tested?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate property based tests?
  • If appropriate, are there adequate unit tests?
  • Should any logging, debugging, tracing information be added or removed?
  • Are error messages user-friendly?
  • Have all documentation changes needed been made?
  • Have all non-obvious changes been commented?

System Compatibility

  • Are there any potential impacts on other parts of the system or backward compatibility?
  • Does this change intersect with any items on our roadmap, and if so, is there a plan for fitting them together?

Quality

  • Is this code of a unexpectedly high quality (Readability, Modularity, Intuitiveness)

@eculver eculver merged commit 75aeb81 into main Jan 8, 2025
79 checks passed
@eculver eculver deleted the eculver/hnsw-resize-bug branch January 8, 2025 01:13
chroma-droid pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2025
## Description of changes

This is a follow-up from #3424 - where I had added code to fix the bug
in compaction but then forgot to replace the method at the actual
callsite with the new method 🤦🏼 .

This updates the problem code to use `len_with_deleted` instead of just
`len` so that the resize actually gets triggered.

Some additional context: we decided not to change the behavior of the
existing `len` method in case other callers were depending on existing
behavior. In other words, we didn't want to introduce accidentally
introduce bugs that were relying on the "buggy" code.
chroma-droid pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2025
## Description of changes

This is a follow-up from #3424 - where I had added code to fix the bug
in compaction but then forgot to replace the method at the actual
callsite with the new method 🤦🏼 .

This updates the problem code to use `len_with_deleted` instead of just
`len` so that the resize actually gets triggered.

Some additional context: we decided not to change the behavior of the
existing `len` method in case other callers were depending on existing
behavior. In other words, we didn't want to introduce accidentally
introduce bugs that were relying on the "buggy" code.
eculver added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 8, 2025
This PR cherry-picks the commit 75aeb81
onto release/2025-01-03. If there are unresolved conflicts, please
resolve them manually.

Co-authored-by: Evan Culver <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant