Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BD-3161] Feature flag experiments | Release Date TBD #7507

Draft
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

internetisaiah
Copy link
Contributor

@internetisaiah internetisaiah commented Jun 12, 2024

Pull Request/Issue Resolution

Description of Change:

New documentation for feature flag experiments.

TODO

Is this change associated with a Braze feature/product release?

  • Yes (Insert Feature Release Date Here)
  • No

✔️ Pull Request Checklist
  • Check that you haven't removed any images (replacing an image with an updated one of the same name is fine), as this breaks the French site
  • Check that all links work.
  • Ensure you have completed our Contributors License Agreement.
  • Tag @josh-mccrowell-braze and @internetisaiah as a reviewer when your work is done and ready to be reviewed for merge. Are you an internal product manager? Reference the internal reviewing chart to tag the appropriate reviewer.
  • If the documentation involves a 1) paid SKU, 2) a third party, 3) SMS, 4) AI, or 5) privacy, ensure that Ana Teresa Serafino on the Legal team has signed off.
  • Tag others as reviewers as necessary.
  • If you have modified any links, be sure to add redirects to assets > js > broken_redirect_list.js
⭐ Helpful Wiki Shortcuts
❗ ATTN: For PR Reviewers
  • Read our Reviewing a PR page for more on our reviewing suggestions.
  • Read our Previewing Documentation page to see how to check the deployment.
    • Preview all changes in the linked Vercel environment by clicking the preview link in the vercel-bot comment in your PR.
❗ ATTN: Internal Reviewing Chart
Work at Braze and not sure who to tag for review?
Before tagging @josh-mccrowell-braze or @internetisaiah for a general review, reference the following chart to see if a specific product vertical/reviewer applies to your pull request.

Reviewer Product Vertical
@josh-mccrowell-braze Monolith Deployments
Quality Infrastructure
Platform Infrastructure
Datalake
SDKs
Currents
@internetisaiah Developer Guide
Technology partners
Channels
@bre-fitzgerald Intelligence
In-App Messages
Channels
Frontend Infrastructure & Experience (FIX)
@lydia-xie Ingestion
Core Objects
Core Messaging
Messaging Experience
Message Components
Email (Composition and Infrastructure) (tag @rachel-feinberg for Liquid use cases)
@rachel-feinberg Customer Lifecycle, Identity and Permissions
SMS
User Targeting
Reporting

@internetisaiah
Copy link
Contributor Author

Note: Waiting on PM for a populated test environment to get screenshots.

@internetisaiah internetisaiah added the status: do not merge Could mean research before "in progress" status, or do not merge yet. label Jun 18, 2024
@internetisaiah internetisaiah changed the title BD-3161: Feature flag experiments [BD-3161] Feature flag experiments Aug 13, 2024
@internetisaiah
Copy link
Contributor Author

From DM with @bkasman95 : we are still waiting on engineering for a (semi) populated test environment for this.

@@ -115,6 +115,10 @@ Total number of clicks on Button 2 of the message.

{% api %}

### Campaign analytics

The performance of the message across various dimensions. The metrics shown depend on the selected messaging channel, and whether the [Feature Flag experiment]({{site.baseurl}}/developer_guide/platform_wide/feature_flags/experiments/#campaign-analytics) is a multivariate test.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bkasman95 : what is meant by "dimensions"? is that a term that we widely use throughout the product/docs? or is there another/more specific term? I'm unfamiliar with marketing lingo, so i'm not sure either way.


## Reviewing the results

After your feature flag experiment is finished, you can review your results for...
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@bkasman95 qq: what are some of the metrics that a user can find here? just want to list a couple as an example here.

@internetisaiah internetisaiah changed the title [BD-3161] Feature flag experiments [BD-3161] Feature flag experiments | Release Date TBD Aug 23, 2024
@internetisaiah
Copy link
Contributor Author

still waiting on engineering for a test environment. relevant ticket here: https://jira.braze.com/browse/GE-3514

@internetisaiah
Copy link
Contributor Author

FYI, still waiting on engineering for test environment. Reached out to relevant stakeholder again today 🫡

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla-signed status: do not merge Could mean research before "in progress" status, or do not merge yet.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants