feat(pointcloud_preprocessor): add pipeline_latency_ms debug publisher to missed modules

[brkay54]

Description

• Improve and document the point cloud pipeline performance evaluation methods #6032

In the issue above, we discussed that a more efficient method would be for the nodes themselves to report the delays.

I missed adding this debug publisher to concatenate_pointclouds and time_synchronizer.

Tests performed

Tested with e2e_simulator. Works well.

Effects on system behavior

Not applicable.

Pre-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below when creating the PR.

• I've confirmed the contribution guidelines.
• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

In-review checklist for the PR reviewers

The PR reviewers must check the checkboxes below before approval.

• The PR follows the pull request guidelines.

Post-review checklist for the PR author

The PR author must check the checkboxes below before merging.

• There are no open discussions or they are tracked via tickets.

After all checkboxes are checked, anyone who has write access can merge the PR.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 12 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 14.78%. Comparing base (71c5669) to head (00ddc57).

Files	Patch %	Lines
...r/src/concatenate_data/concatenate_pointclouds.cpp	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️
...rc/time_synchronizer/time_synchronizer_nodelet.cpp	0.00%	5 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #6569      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   14.78%   14.78%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        1917     1917              
  Lines      132253   132266      +13     
  Branches    39297    39297              
==========================================
  Hits        19550    19550              
- Misses      90876    90889      +13     
  Partials    21827    21827              

Flag	Coverage Δ		*Carryforward flag
differential	5.18% <0.00%> (?)
total	14.78% <ø> (ø)		Carriedforward from 71c5669

*This pull request uses carry forward flags. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[YoshiRi]

LGTM
I checked with sample-rosbag with tutorial. (Need to merge sample_sensor_kit_PR )

/sensing/lidar/concatenate_pointclouds_debug/debug/sensing/lidar/left/pointcloud/pipeline_latency_ms
/sensing/lidar/concatenate_pointclouds_debug/debug/sensing/lidar/right/pointcloud/pipeline_latency_ms
/sensing/lidar/concatenate_pointclouds_debug/debug/sensing/lidar/top/pointcloud/pipeline_latency_ms
# also found in time_sync pointclouds

@miursh Could you approve as a owner?

[brkay54]

@miursh Sorry to bother you Miura-san. We need an approval from code owners. If you have time, could you check it?