You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since I have 79 individuals, I was using 'complete' program to generate a look up table for each chromosome. (Buffalo has 24 autosomal chromosomes). So, I have .sites and .loc file for each chromosomes. So, should my -n be 158 (=2*79) for every 'complete' run for each chromosome?
Is it advisable to use (n=120, theta=0.001 per site) or (n=192, theta=0.001 per site) to generate my own look up table for each chromosome if my look up table generation is going to take a long time? (and use lkgen instead)?
Regards,
Prasun
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Adam,
I have 79 individuals (water buffalo) for which I need to generate a look up table. I have two questions:
Since I have 79 individuals, I was using 'complete' program to generate a look up table for each chromosome. (Buffalo has 24 autosomal chromosomes). So, I have .sites and .loc file for each chromosomes. So, should my -n be 158 (=2*79) for every 'complete' run for each chromosome?
Regards,
Prasun
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: