You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
After reading the manual it sounded like a minor mis-specification of theta doesn't affect the estimate of rho that much.
But I hope to understand the proper method for setting theta if I have quality-filtered my segregating sites (e.g. based on allele frequency, SNP quality and sequencing coverage).
If I use the input file format that only shows segregating sites (format 2), wouldn't that lower the estimate of theta? Should I go ahead with this lowered theta or instead estimate theta by other means and use that to generate a look-up table?
Another related question: do the pre-generated lookup tables in lk_files/ work for genotype datasets?
Best Regards,
Ray
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Depending on your exact situation, one suggestion would be to estimate
recombination results using a range of (reasonable) theta estimates. My
expectation is that the results should be qualitatively similar.
Yes - the likelihood files should work with genotype data, although it
often better to provide phased data if possible.
On 9 October 2017 at 02:57, Ray ***@***.***> wrote:
Dear Adam,
After reading the manual it sounded like a minor mis-specification of theta doesn't affect the estimate of rho that much.
But I hope to understand the proper method for setting theta if I have quality-filtered my segregating sites (e.g. based on allele frequency, SNP quality and sequencing coverage).
If I use the input file format that only shows segregating sites (format 2), wouldn't that lower the estimate of theta? Should I go ahead with this lowered theta or instead estimate theta by other means and use that to generate a look-up table?
Another related question: do the pre-generated lookup tables in lk_files/ work for genotype datasets?
Best Regards,
Ray
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#4>, or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AElWYzIt5r4ma9Jua8YZSckdgw5bSqxDks5sqe4OgaJpZM4PyPut>
.
Hi Adam, thank you for your help. I will try with different thetas.
We only have ~60 individuals for our fish, which may be too low for phasing with accuracy.
Dear Adam,
After reading the manual it sounded like a minor mis-specification of theta doesn't affect the estimate of rho that much.
But I hope to understand the proper method for setting theta if I have quality-filtered my segregating sites (e.g. based on allele frequency, SNP quality and sequencing coverage).
If I use the input file format that only shows segregating sites (format 2), wouldn't that lower the estimate of theta? Should I go ahead with this lowered theta or instead estimate theta by other means and use that to generate a look-up table?
Another related question: do the pre-generated lookup tables in lk_files/ work for genotype datasets?
Best Regards,
Ray
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: