Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Setting a proper theta in filtered/subsampled SNP datasets #4

Open
melop opened this issue Oct 9, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Setting a proper theta in filtered/subsampled SNP datasets #4

melop opened this issue Oct 9, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@melop
Copy link

melop commented Oct 9, 2017

Dear Adam,

After reading the manual it sounded like a minor mis-specification of theta doesn't affect the estimate of rho that much.
But I hope to understand the proper method for setting theta if I have quality-filtered my segregating sites (e.g. based on allele frequency, SNP quality and sequencing coverage).
If I use the input file format that only shows segregating sites (format 2), wouldn't that lower the estimate of theta? Should I go ahead with this lowered theta or instead estimate theta by other means and use that to generate a look-up table?

Another related question: do the pre-generated lookup tables in lk_files/ work for genotype datasets?

Best Regards,
Ray

@auton1
Copy link
Owner

auton1 commented Oct 9, 2017 via email

@melop
Copy link
Author

melop commented Oct 9, 2017

Hi Adam, thank you for your help. I will try with different thetas.
We only have ~60 individuals for our fish, which may be too low for phasing with accuracy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants