-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Revert PageSaga changes #36666
Merged
Merged
fix: Revert PageSaga changes #36666
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
💡 Codebase verification
Attention to Detail is Key!
You've added an extra
true
parameter to thesetupPublishedPage
function call inAppViewerEngine.ts
. Great job on making progress! However, I noticed that there's another usage ofsetupPublishedPage
inindex.tsx
with only two arguments:app/client/src/pages/AppViewer/index.tsx: dispatch(setupPublishedPage(pageId, true));
To ensure consistency and prevent potential issues:
setupPublishedPage
to include the new boolean parameter.🔗 Analysis chain
Class, let's examine this change carefully!
I see you've added an extra
true
parameter to thesetupPublishedPage
function call. This is an important modification, so let's make sure we understand its implications:This change aligns with the PR objective of reverting previous modifications. Well done on following through with the reversion!
However, we need to ensure this doesn't cause any unintended side effects. Can you please verify that this change doesn't negatively impact the page setup process in the published view?
Remember, good documentation is crucial for maintaining our codebase. If you haven't already, please update any relevant documentation or comments to reflect this change in the function signature.
To help us understand the impact, let's run a quick check on the
setupPublishedPage
function:Class, after running this check, we'll have a better understanding of how this change fits into the bigger picture. Remember, in coding as in life, it's important to consider the ripple effects of our actions!
Great effort on setting up the initial verification! Let's refine our approach to ensure we gather the needed information effectively.
It looks like the
rg
command didn't recognize thetypescript
file type. Let's adjust it to use the correct identifier and try again:Let's run this updated script to accurately locate the function definition and its usages. Once we have the results, we'll be better equipped to finalize the verification!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
Length of output: 342
Script:
Length of output: 757