fix: Revert PageSaga changes #36666
fix: Revert PageSaga changes #36666
Conversation
This reverts commit b582098.
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files, primarily focusing on enhancing the handling of page loading states within the Redux Saga framework. Key changes include the addition of a Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
This reverts commit f49cf0a.
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/client/src/ce/sagas/__tests__/PageSaga.test.ts (1)
50-50: Class, I think we need to have a discussion about these changes.It seems we've encountered a situation where our actions don't match our intentions. The PR objective states that we should be reverting changes, but instead, we're adding new lines. This is like saying you're going to erase the chalkboard, but instead, you're writing more on it!
Let's review our lesson plan:
- The PR title is "fix: Revert PageSaga changes"
- The description indicates that changes from a previous PR are being undone
Given this information, I believe these additions may be incorrect. Would you like me to assist in properly reverting these changes? It would be like helping to clean the chalkboard to start fresh for our next lesson.
Also applies to: 60-60
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (5)
- app/client/src/actions/pageActions.tsx (2 hunks)
- app/client/src/ce/sagas/PageSagas.tsx (5 hunks)
- app/client/src/ce/sagas/tests/PageSaga.test.ts (2 hunks)
- app/client/src/entities/Engine/AppViewerEngine.ts (1 hunks)
- app/client/src/pages/AppViewer/index.tsx (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (14)
app/client/src/actions/pageActions.tsx (4)
71-71: Class, let's examine this addition to our interface.The new
firstLoadproperty is like adding a special stamp to our homework. It helps us know if this is the first time we're turning it in or if we're submitting a revision. This is a good change that will help us keep track of our page loading process better.
82-89: Now, class, let's look at how we've updated our action creator.We've added a new parameter
firstLoadto our function, just like adding a new question to our pop quiz. This parameter helps us tell our Redux store whether this is the first time we're fetching the page or not.Remember, we've set the default value to
false. This is like having a default answer on our quiz sheet - it means our old code won't break when it calls this function without the new parameter.This is a good change that keeps our code consistent with the interface we just updated. Well done!
678-678: Class, pay attention to this important change in our interface.We've added a new required property
firstLoadto our SetupPublishedPageActionPayload. This is like adding a mandatory field to our class registration form. It ensures that whenever we set up a published page, we always specify whether it's the first time we're loading it or not.This change is consistent with our previous updates and helps us maintain a clear record of our page loading process. Excellent work on improving our code organization!
685-692: Let's examine how we've updated our setupPublishedPage function, class.We've added a new parameter
firstLoadto our function, similar to adding a new checkbox on our field trip permission slip. This parameter allows us to specify whether this is the first time we're setting up the published page.Just like before, we've set the default value to
false. This is our safety net, ensuring that if someone forgets to check this new box, our old permission slips (I mean, our existing code) will still work correctly.This change keeps our function in harmony with the SetupPublishedPageActionPayload interface we just updated. It's a great example of maintaining consistency in our codebase. Keep up the good work!
app/client/src/pages/AppViewer/index.tsx (3)
31-34: Well done on updating the action importsIt's good to see that you've correctly imported
setupPublishedPageandfetchPublishedPageResourcesActionfrom"actions/pageActions". This ensures that the necessary actions are available for dispatching.
168-169: Properly dispatching setupPublishedPage actionI appreciate how you've dispatched
setupPublishedPage(pageId, true). This effectively sets up the published page when a validpageIdis present. Great job!
171-171: Correct usage of fetchPublishedPageResourcesActionBy dispatching
fetchPublishedPageResourcesAction(basePageId), you're ensuring that the necessary resources for the published page are fetched appropriately. Excellent work!app/client/src/ce/sagas/PageSagas.tsx (7)
332-333: Excellent addition of 'firstLoad' to action payloadIncluding the
firstLoadparameter in your action payload is a prudent decision. This will allow your saga to conditionally execute logic based on whether the page is loading for the first time, enhancing the efficiency of your page load handling.
345-365: Effective integration of 'postFetchedPublishedPage' logicBy incorporating the logic from
postFetchedPublishedPagedirectly intofetchPublishedPageSaga, you've streamlined the code flow. This refactoring reduces unnecessary function calls and improves the readability and maintainability of your saga.
370-379: Proper use of 'firstLoad' in conditional executionImplementing a check on
firstLoadbefore triggeringexecutePageLoadActions()is an astute optimization. This ensures that page load actions are not redundantly executed on the first load, which can enhance performance and prevent potential side effects.
395-395: Clear extraction of 'pageId' from action payloadGood job extracting
pageIddirectly fromaction.payload. This enhances code clarity and ensures that thepageIdis readily available for subsequent operations.
413-415: Efficient handling of published actions in resource sagaBy passing an empty
applicationIdwhenpublishedActionsare present, you've optimized the fetching process. This prevents unnecessary API calls and ensures that only the required data is fetched, which is a commendable practice.
1428-1429: Consistent inclusion of 'firstLoad' in 'setupPublishedPageSaga'Including
firstLoadin theaction.payloadofsetupPublishedPageSagaaligns this function with your other sagas. Consistency in parameter usage across sagas is crucial for maintainability and predictability.
1435-1442: Correct parameter passing in 'fetchPublishedPageAction'When dispatching
fetchPublishedPageAction, you've correctly passed all necessary parameters, includingfirstLoadandpageWithMigratedDsl. This ensures that the action receives all the information it needs to function properly.
| @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ export default class AppViewerEngine extends AppEngine { | |||
| }), | |||
| fetchSelectedAppThemeAction(applicationId, currentTheme), | |||
| fetchAppThemesAction(applicationId, themes), | |||
| setupPublishedPage(toLoadPageId, true, pageWithMigratedDsl), | |||
| setupPublishedPage(toLoadPageId, true, true, pageWithMigratedDsl), | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Attention to Detail is Key!
You've added an extra true parameter to the setupPublishedPage function call in AppViewerEngine.ts. Great job on making progress! However, I noticed that there's another usage of setupPublishedPage in index.tsx with only two arguments:
app/client/src/pages/AppViewer/index.tsx: dispatch(setupPublishedPage(pageId, true));
To ensure consistency and prevent potential issues:
- Please update all instances of
setupPublishedPageto include the new boolean parameter. - Verify that the function implementation can handle the additional parameter without causing unintended side effects.
- Consider adding tests to cover the updated function signature and its usages.
🔗 Analysis chain
Class, let's examine this change carefully!
I see you've added an extra true parameter to the setupPublishedPage function call. This is an important modification, so let's make sure we understand its implications:
-
This change aligns with the PR objective of reverting previous modifications. Well done on following through with the reversion!
-
However, we need to ensure this doesn't cause any unintended side effects. Can you please verify that this change doesn't negatively impact the page setup process in the published view?
-
Remember, good documentation is crucial for maintaining our codebase. If you haven't already, please update any relevant documentation or comments to reflect this change in the function signature.
To help us understand the impact, let's run a quick check on the setupPublishedPage function:
Class, after running this check, we'll have a better understanding of how this change fits into the bigger picture. Remember, in coding as in life, it's important to consider the ripple effects of our actions!
Great effort on setting up the initial verification! Let's refine our approach to ensure we gather the needed information effectively.
It looks like the rg command didn't recognize the typescript file type. Let's adjust it to use the correct identifier and try again:
Let's run this updated script to accurately locate the function definition and its usages. Once we have the results, we'll be better equipped to finalize the verification!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the implementation and usage of setupPublishedPage
# Search for the setupPublishedPage function definition
echo "setupPublishedPage function definition:"
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function setupPublishedPage($_) {
$$$
}'
# Search for other usages of setupPublishedPage
echo "\nOther usages of setupPublishedPage:"
rg --type typescript 'setupPublishedPage\(' -A 2
Length of output: 342
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the implementation and usage of setupPublishedPage with corrected file type
# Search for the setupPublishedPage function definition
echo "setupPublishedPage function definition:"
ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern $'function setupPublishedPage($_) {
$$$
}'
# Search for other usages of setupPublishedPage with correct file type
echo "\nOther usages of setupPublishedPage:"
rg --type ts 'setupPublishedPage\(' -A 2
Length of output: 757
Reverts #36658
Reverts #36433
Warning
Tests have not run on the HEAD f550232 yet
Thu, 03 Oct 2024 04:35:59 UTC
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
firstLoadparameter for better handling of initial page loads.AppViewercomponent to streamline the initialization process for published pages.Bug Fixes
Tests
firstLoadproperty for action payloads.Chores